Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 646
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 396
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 279
George Spelvin 265
sharkman29 255
Top Posters
DallasRain70793
biomed163231
Yssup Rider60927
gman4453294
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48646
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42577
CryptKicker37215
The_Waco_Kid37006
Mokoa36496
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-23-2021, 03:54 PM   #16
reddog1951
Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 29, 2010
Location: mo
Posts: 1,550
Encounters: 3
Default

Please reread the original quote; it does not say more than one roundround...the "count" actually starts at 20 and is undefined. Not arguing gun rights per se, but am pointing out hysterical hyperbole by zealots. The are a lot of "guns" already illegal for most private citizens. Big difference between limitations (some exist today) and outright ban. Obfuscation at its finest.
reddog1951 is offline   Quote
Old 07-23-2021, 03:56 PM   #17
Strokey_McDingDong
Account Frozen
 
Strokey_McDingDong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 8, 2020
Location: Ding Dong
Posts: 3,593
Default

Fuck gun bans.

Gobment knows that the hundred million legal gun owners could take them down.
Strokey_McDingDong is offline   Quote
Old 07-23-2021, 04:32 PM   #18
royamcr
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 7, 2010
Location: OPKS
Posts: 7,236
Encounters: 38
Default

There will be no ban, maybe high capacity mags like a while back. It doesn't matter how many rounds a mag holds, someone could just go buy ten mags. It takes what 2 seconds to change mags... Talk of gun bans are just GOP fear mongering. Best can do is plug loopholes in private gun sale background checks. Criminals will get guns no matter any laws.
royamcr is offline   Quote
Old 07-23-2021, 05:10 PM   #19
Levianon17
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2019
Location: In the valley
Posts: 10,786
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by reddog1951 View Post
Please reread the original quote; it does not say more than one roundround...the "count" actually starts at 20 and is undefined. Not arguing gun rights per se, but am pointing out hysterical hyperbole by zealots. The are a lot of "guns" already illegal for most private citizens. Big difference between limitations (some exist today) and outright ban. Obfuscation at its finest.
I was just being sarcastic about one round, 10,20 it doesn't matter. It isn't up to Joe Biden to determine the number of Rounds a Firearm is capable of Firing. Under a pressing situation even a well trained person's accuracy will suffer, multiple rounds maybe quite necessary.
Levianon17 is offline   Quote
Old 07-24-2021, 12:05 AM   #20
dilbert firestorm
Valued Poster
 
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 9, 2010
Location: Nuclear Wasteland BBS, New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 31,921
Encounters: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by reddog1951 View Post
From the thread starter post:

"Biden responded. “The idea you need a weapon that can have the ability to fire 20, 30, 40, 50, 120 shots from that weapon, whether it’s a, whether it’s a 9mm pistol or whether it’s a rifle, is ridiculous.”.....
“I’m continuing to push to eliminate the sale of those things, but I’m not likely to get that done in the near term,” Biden added."
...."Whether it’s a nine millimeter pistol or whether it’s a rifle, is ridiculous. I’m continuing to push the elimination of a sale of those things. But I’m not likely to get that done in the near term."

From Oeb:
"Joe Biden says he wants to ban handguns..."

Big inflammatory leap in "logic" there. The Biden quote clearly questions the need for weapons that can fire multiple rounds of some undefined number starting at 20. The quote does not support an intent to ban all handguns.
yes, biden actually said this about banning handguns. re-read in red.

9mm pistols are handguns.
dilbert firestorm is offline   Quote
Old 07-24-2021, 03:35 AM   #21
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Biden Just Said He Wants to Ban Handguns
Just remove the "Hand" and you'll get his real focus with one exception:

Exception 1: Except the guys who guard me .. and HUNTER!
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 07-24-2021, 11:46 AM   #22
reddog1951
Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 29, 2010
Location: mo
Posts: 1,550
Encounters: 3
Default

A lesson to Dilbert and others on how to parse a sentence:

"The idea you need a weapon that can have the ability to fire 20, 30, 40, 50, 120 shots from that weapon, whether it’s a, whether it’s a 9mm pistol or whether it’s a rifle, is ridiculous.”

Now get rid of the section in parentheses and you have:

"The idea you need a weapon that can have the ability to fire 20, 30, 40, 50, 120 shots from that weapon.....is ridiculous.”

That is the fundamental message of the sentence.

The section in parentheses "Whether it’s a, whether it’s a 9mm pistol or whether it’s a rifle" is a qualifying clause applicable to the subject of the sentence of which it is part; in this case, high capital weapons. Neither handguns, nor rifles, are the subject of the sentence.

Basic English 101.
reddog1951 is offline   Quote
Old 07-24-2021, 01:22 PM   #23
royamcr
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 7, 2010
Location: OPKS
Posts: 7,236
Encounters: 38
Default

Fucking grammar police just showed up.
royamcr is offline   Quote
Old 07-24-2021, 07:51 PM   #24
reddog1951
Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 29, 2010
Location: mo
Posts: 1,550
Encounters: 3
Default

Not Grammer police, just fundamentals of reading. "Spin" is one thing, misinterpretation (deliberate?) is another. Merely correcting flaws in logic.
reddog1951 is offline   Quote
Old 07-25-2021, 04:02 AM   #25
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by royamcr View Post
Fucking grammar police just showed up.
Quit making excuses for the demented fool for whom you voted.
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 07-25-2021, 08:09 AM   #26
Jacuzzme
Premium Access
 
Jacuzzme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 16, 2016
Location: Steel City
Posts: 7,892
Encounters: 43
Default

What’s it matter the capacity if nobody can afford ammo. Been a while since I’ve fired anything besides rimfire, and even that’s high these days. The CCI minimags that my SR22 and 10/22 both like are $.12-15 per round. Forget spending a couple range hours with 223 unless you don’t mind blowing a couple hundred.
Jacuzzme is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved