Muslims support Romney ..

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

Is this some kind of pig Latin. When you say snick you really want some dick

Unlike you I prefer women just short for snicker...

[wellendowed1911]

Originally Posted by Little Stevie

Exactly, well-endowed1911!

Rmoney is a Mormon, Eddie Munster is a Catholic, Rove is an extraterrestrial and now these Muslims are infiltrating the party?

NONE of the leaders has a close personal relationship with Jeebus!

Well, you know, Ryan has to go through the Pope and Rmoney has to pray to the one that came to the United state and met with Joseph Smith!

What will the religious right have to say about that?

Yes this will be the first time in the History that there has been a ticket where neither person is a Protestant - God help us!!!!

[Dawgs]

And we all know that Obie thinks he is the messiah.

[LovingKayla]

There's no such thing as a muslim republician. This would be classic misdirection. As someone on the right, I say it's a lie. I do not align with muslims. Any muslim that claims to be someone over here is at worst, not to be trusted by either side. It does tell me the democrats are pretty desperate. You don't start pulling out the acts of desperation until the last straw if about to fall. I'm pretty encouraged by this thread.


Romney is actually going to win just based on these transparent tactics alone.


I'd take Romney and his faith over a muslim any day of the week.



I was listening to alex Bennett this morning and they said something that just hit me as, wow I'm glad this isn't my side. They were talking about taking stuff out of context just to make the point. Doesn't matter what the point is, even if you have take something out of context to get it across. What? That's the same as lying. If I were new to the country and listened to everyone..... well I'd run away from home.....But the Right commentators don't come out and say... lie when you have to.

4 years of Mitt, then MAYBE we can get a candidate in that is actually a center.

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by LovingKayla

There's no such thing as a muslim republician. This would be classic misdirection. As someone on the right, I say it's a lie. I do not align with muslims. Any muslim that claims to be someone over here is at worst, not to be trusted by either side. It does tell me the democrats are pretty desperate. You don't start pulling out the acts of desperation until the last straw if about to fall. I'm pretty encouraged by this thread.


Romney is actually going to win just based on these transparent tactics alone.


I'd take Romney and his faith over a muslim any day of the week.



I was listening to alex Bennett this morning and they said something that just hit me as, wow I'm glad this isn't my side. They were talking about taking stuff out of context just to make the point. Doesn't matter what the point is, even if you have take something out of context to get it across. What? That's the same as lying. If I were new to the country and listened to everyone..... well I'd run away from home.....But the Right commentators don't come out and say... lie when you have to.

4 years of Mitt, then MAYBE we can get a candidate in that is actually a center.

just read it


http://muslimrepublicans.net/Article.asp?ID=148

[LovingKayla]

I looked at the site cj. I'm telling you there's no way it's on the up and up. Muslim values and Christian conservative values are opposite.

You do know the lies ever released are in print right?

[CJ7]

thought you may get a kick out of this guy bashing obie

[LovingKayla]

That was another thing, he wasn't really that good at bashing him. The whole site is bogus. Muslims are occupy supporter type folks. You can't bring a chicken to a hog contest (unless it's your lucky chicken that makes your hog win every time.)

[CuteOldGuy]

I still don't know why the Muslims didn't have their party at the Republican convention. And I don't know why the party that "opposes' the supposed "war on women" would accept such a woman hating religion at their convention. Will security be allowed to look under the birkas?

[CJ7]

may be a fake republican muslim site, but you can damn sure donate to Romney there

lmao


AND join the NRA too

baahhhhahahahahahahahaha

[joe bloe]

Originally Posted by wellendowed1911

Yes this will be the first time in the History that there has been a ticket where neither person is a Protestant - God help us!!!!

Obama PRETENDS to be a Protestant (Church of Christ). That's pretty close.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnlRrxXv-v8

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

I still don't know why the Muslims didn't have their party at the Republican convention. And I don't know why the party that "opposes' the supposed "war on women" would accept such a woman hating religion at their convention. Will security be allowed to look under the birkas?

even burgas too ..

[CuteOldGuy]

Oops. it is spelled burqa or burga. But you get my drift.

[LovingKayla]

You'd have to throw in some stuff like that CJ to make the scam believable. I'd be terrified to donate through a muslim site. They'd have everything on me. NO way man.

[Guest032516]

Originally Posted by wellendowed1911

They may support Romney because technically Romney and Ryan(Mormon and Catholic) are not true Christians.

You know, I was going to say that is one of the dumbest things I ever heard.

But then, I know a lot of Catholics who regard theirs as the true Christian faith and think that Protestants are the fakes - particularly the fundamentalist, evangelical denominations that believe in Biblical literalism.

These Catholics have no problems with, say, Episcopalians (Catholic-Lite), Methodists, or Lutherans - the High Church Protestants, generally speaking. But they roll their eyes at the Bible-thumping TV preachers and faith healers.

So I guess that makes it even all around, eh?

BTW, I like the way you slipped in "technically". Can there really be such a thing? Is there some authoritative source that defines who "technically" is or is not a "true" "Christian"?

Because I am pretty sure that Catholics think that a lot Protestants "technically" are not true Christians.

Why would the Evangelical definition be more legitimate? Because "factually", there are more Catholics around the globe than there are Protestants - like 1.2 billion Catholics, 900 million Protestants. Muslims clock in at around 1.1 billion, just behind the Catholics.

So wouldn't the Catholic definition of a true Christian hold sway?

Just asking...