Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
"The administration told the commissioners that 35 percent of enrollees are under age 35, and later said 28 percent are in the coveted 18-to-35 age bracket. However, Hamm emphasized, the health status of those individuals is still unknown."
7% are under 18 and new to the program. It doesn't matter whose policy they're on. They are new enrollees.
28% are in the "coveted" group because they pay premiums and are the statistically healthiest group.
And while the health status of those enrollees is still unknown, it is very likely to reflect the general health status of a similar group of existing health ensured people.
"The administration told the commissioners that 35 percent of enrollees are under age 35, and later said 28 percent are in the coveted 18-to-35 age bracket. However, Hamm emphasized, the health status of those individuals is still unknown."
7% are under 18 and new to the program. It doesn't matter whose policy they're on. They are new enrollees.
28% are in the "coveted" group because they pay premiums and are the statistically healthiest group.
And while the health status of those enrollees is still unknown, it is very likely to reflect the general health status of a similar group of existing health ensured people.
... and also being of the group noted for its high percentage of single parent households with one or more children; thus, not the sustaining "contributors" Odumbo swore would carry the load for the rest of America.
... and also being of the group noted for its high percentage of single parent households with one or more children; thus, not the sustaining "contributors" Odumbo swore would carry the load for the rest of America.
The OP was about the number of enrollees. The fact they enrolled, in my opinion, indicates they intend to pay. They know this isn't welfare. Since no one has been required to pay anything yet, there are no hard numbers yet.
The OP was about the number of enrollees. The fact they enrolled, in my opinion, indicates they intend to pay. They know this isn't welfare. Since no one has been required to pay anything yet, there are no hard numbers yet.
Oh, but for many, it IS entirely or heavily subsidized "welfare" with someone else paying the bill. Odumbo, Pelosi, etc., made that completely clear when they wrote, voted for and enacted the bill.
Oh, but for many, it IS entirely or heavily subsidized "welfare" with someone else paying the bill.
How many ranchers and farmers have been at the trough for how many years getting subsidized crops, grazing rights, mineral leases, etc? There are many types of "welfare".
Health insurance for all is by far the least offensive type to me.
How many ranchers and farmers have been at the trough for how many years getting subsidized crops, grazing rights, mineral leases, etc? There are many types of "welfare".
Health insurance for all is by far the least offensive type to me.
Subsidizing farmers, etc., is one of FDR's greatest legacies. If it was so bad, why did the liberals put the legislation in place? BTW, which group would you say shows a better return on the investment and pays more in taxes?
The OP was about the number of enrollees. The fact they enrolled, in my opinion, indicates they intend to pay. They know this isn't welfare. Since no one has been required to pay anything yet, there are no hard numbers yet.
I don't know about you, but enrollment implies payment. Registration doesn't (other than perhaps a token payment). The insurance companies have said (contrary to the Obama administration) that the insurance doesn't kick in until payment occurs.
