and time to light the fire!

[FunInDFW]

If rules were always enforced to the 't', there would be bans/infractions all over in every thread just about (generally speaking for message boards not just this one). Aside from the time factor, that just doesn't make for a 'good' forum. You need a bit of maliability. "... is more of what you'd call 'guidelines' than actual rules." from Pirates of the Caribbean comes to mind when thinking about this. You let people slide or bend the rules within reason up until a point. You can fall back to the letter of the law when showing why a ban period or length is warranted. Showing just how many times they actually violated a rule and leeway was given.

Should a poster with a flawless history posting a troll topic be given the same punishment as someone who's last 10 topics have been bait for trolling/conflict? While the violation may be the same, the circumstances may vary and lead to a different course of action. Should that mean parties are treated different? Maybe, maybe not. It's for the ruling body to decide what's best and how to handle situations as the arise.


All that said, the nature of the original post seems like you're wanting people to talk at you as if to be waiting for conflict rather than discuss things with you to understand each others point of view.

[Guest092216]

Bridgette Black was a handle that posted right after you and your buddy last were banned last time. It was a cheap imitation of bitchtits and I tweeted about it bc I found it amusing. Not outting. It's a handle not a name.

[!VI!]

Originally Posted by thathottnurse

Bridgette Black was a handle that posted right after you and your buddy last were banned last time. It was a cheap imitation of bitchtits and I tweeted about it bc I found it amusing. Not outting. It's a handle not a name.

oh lol then nvm i feel better now thank you

it was just a weird thing

"like why in the hell is she posting about me on.... wait escorts have twitters!"

i thought you ment my name was Bridgette lol i was like WAY off

[bored@home]

Originally Posted by davidfree986

Damn! that is provider #2 THN has outed (many more to come) and the morning is not over yet! This one is not hear say, as it is on THN's twitter page, but makes the previous one look more valid. Report that to the mods

Correct it is not hearsay but rather a twist of context, not outing. Speculating about the many mutil handle crew for sure but as i recall we all live in glass houses so continue the crusade.

[!VI!]

Originally Posted by FunInDFW

If rules were always enforced to the 't', there would be bans/infractions all over in every thread just about (generally speaking for message boards not just this one). Aside from the time factor, that just doesn't make for a 'good' forum. You need a bit of maliability. "... is more of what you'd call 'guidelines' than actual rules." from Pirates of the Caribbean comes to mind when thinking about this. You let people slide or bend the rules within reason up until a point. You can fall back to the letter of the law when showing why a ban period or length is warranted. Showing just how many times they actually violated a rule and leeway was given.

Should a poster with a flawless history posting a troll topic be given the same punishment as someone who's last 10 topics have been bait for trolling/conflict? While the violation may be the same, the circumstances may vary and lead to a different course of action. Should that mean parties are treated different? Maybe, maybe not. It's for the ruling body to decide what's best and how to handle situations as the arise.


All that said, the nature of the original post seems like you're wanting people to talk at you as if to be waiting for conflict rather than discuss things with you to understand each others point of view.

actually i just want to know why, i seems like as long as you can et buddy buddy you become an exception to the rule

[!VI!]

Originally Posted by bored@home

Correct it is not hearsay but rather a twist of context, not outing. Speculating about the many mutil handle crew for sure but as i recall we all live in glass houses so continue the crusade.

i had to look this phrase up lol

good job

[oldbutstillgoing]

Keep in mind this is not twitter. The mods here are not the hobby police. They moderate posts here, not on twitter or any where else. The board has become much more lenient on applying the guidelines. If that is good or bad is up to you to decide.

And, David, THN does not have to out you. Everyone who cares already knows your past handles and history.

[Guest110416]

Originally Posted by OldButStillGoing

.....................Everyone who cares already knows your past handles and history.

Speaking of glass houses............

[Glenn Quagmire]

Originally Posted by Wulf_Princess

Now i sat back a reviewed the TOS and i now know how to word this in a way the will prove a point or two...
...
How is it that i have spotted at the thread i last posted AT LEAST 12 posts that have clearly violated at least one of the rules in the TOS and a moderator actually posted on it breaking on of the rules him self??
...

How do you know that no one has received any points or warnings? They are generally not made public. Only the poster and the staff know.

Worry about your own behavior.
RTM and offending posts.
Move on.


* Note, I think any infractions should be made public simply so that others see what behavior is expected of them. the "private admonishments" do little to guide the posting members behavior since they "think" others are getting away with breaking the rules.

[cubsoxbull]

I think we need a bigger boat.

[jdough1211]

Did she even make it a week before being banned this time?

[Guest061814]

What did she do?

[M69]

Originally Posted by Glenn Quagmire

How do you know that no one has received any points or warnings? They are generally not made public. Only the poster and the staff know.

Worry about your own behavior.
RTM and offending posts.
Move on.


* Note, I think any infractions should be made public simply so that others see what behavior is expected of them. the "private admonishments" do little to guide the posting members behavior since they "think" others are getting away with breaking the rules.

I think they should make multiple handles and fake review violations public information so I can judge their posts and reviews accordingly.

[Lucas McCain]

Originally Posted by Your Naughty Muse

What did she do?

My guess is that she was banned for being an angry bat shit crazy little kid who can't remotely control her delusional self.

[Tetas]

Naw!!!
It's cause the mods are picking on her...