Bare back and the way guys think

[Nicky Wayne]

Ok what about providers with SO & husbands can you guarantee the clients that they are disease free?

[Ginger Doll]

Originally Posted by lil nicky

Ok what about providers with SO & husbands can you guarantee the clients that they are disease free?

Having unprotected sex with one person in a committed relationship is quite a bit different than having unprotected sex with countless, random people in the hobby. It’s not even remotely comparable.

[Nicky Wayne]

It doesn't matter to a disease committed or not.

[Ginger Doll]

Originally Posted by lil nicky

It doesn't matter to a disease committed or not.

It DOES matter if you are only doing it with ONE person — versus the multitudes of people that you meet in the hobby. One person, versus possibly hundreds, obviously makes the risk drastically lower.

And what’s the difference between a provider who has a relationship, and a hobbyist? Most of the hobbyists here are in committed relationships, and I would venture that the vast majority of them have sex with their SO without protection.

Your (lack of) thought process completely baffles me.

[Danielle Reid]

Originally Posted by lil nicky

Ok what about providers with SO & husbands can you guarantee the clients that they are disease free?

What about clients with SOs and wives? Can you guarantee the providers that they are disease free?

See how stupid this question is?

[Hogfan69]

You can still transmit genital herpes, human papillomavirus [HPV] infection, syphilis, and chancroid with a condom on so if you're playing in this hobby and think as long as you wear a condom you aren't taking anything home, you're mistaken. This is risky enough without worrying if they're banging guys without condoms.

[I speak the truth]

I think I caught something from a provider once, Pink Eye, she must have farted on a pillow. I hope it wasn't on purpose.

[stanleedies]

Originally Posted by Hogfan69

You can still transmit genital herpes, human papillomavirus [HPV] infection, syphilis, and chancroid with a condom on so if you're playing in this hobby and think as long as you wear a condom you aren't taking anything home, you're mistaken. This is risky enough without worrying if they're banging guys without condoms.

Well said.

Any provider or client is entitled to play within their own set of rules in the hobby. It's not really anyone's place to say this or that is or is not correct. To each their own, do or do not. Similar to providers' decision to be CBJ or BBBJ, perhaps you lessen the chance of getting something orally by having the guy wear a hat in the act but you can transmit genital herpes with any skin to skin contact. Chances are low (or lower with a hat) but it can still happen. Business for certain ladies might be slower with CBJ but that's her rule if she deems it that way. Just like it's a clients decision not to see a provider if that's his rule....whatever.

[Guest110920]

Originally Posted by lil nicky

It doesn't matter to a disease committed or not.

No, but it exponentially increases the number of potential disease vectors when someone barebacks.

To riff on Vannah's Russian Roulette analogy a bit, if one person has a gun pointed at you and pulls the trigger with one bullet in the gun, you have a around a 17% chance of getting shot (assuming a six shot revolver). How much do you think the chance goes up if, say, 100 people all have guns pointed at you with one bullet in each? The chance of each individual person shooting you is the same, but your chance of getting shot is one hell of a lot higher. It matters not if one of the people holding a gun is in a committed relationship - a bullet, like a disease, does not care. But it's specious to make the logical leap that because it doesn't care that it would be the same situation if it was only the committed relationship person holding the gun rather than that person and 99 of his friends.

Ginger said the same thing more succinctly but I'm known to be a windbag.

It's not a perfect analogy because in STD terms, not all "guns" are going to have a bullet in the chamber, but it's safest to assume that they all do.

I think it is good and healthy we are having this discussion, for people to show where they stand. I'd hate for this place to become like Dallas, where BB is openly advertised. People will still do it here of course but it shouldn't be normalized.

Originally Posted by lil nicky

Ok what about providers with SO & husbands can you guarantee the clients that they are disease free?

It's not about guarantees. Nothing is guaranteed, as others have said. It's about mitigating what risk you can.

[Nicky Wayne]

Ginger I can dazzle them with brilliance or baffle them with bull poop. Thanks you for your support. Saint Nick.

[Johnnytricks]

I'm sure some of the hobbyists Significant other is banging her boyfriend bb and some I'm sure some have multiple partners. Ever Heard of cheating wives lol.frequent visits to the clinic is the only way I think not to worry to much about it.

[slobthanob]

Sounds like something Danielle would do...

Originally Posted by I speak the truth

I think I caught something from a provider once, Pink Eye, she must have farted on a pillow. I hope it wasn't on purpose.

[I speak the truth]

Haha, Best response ever!

Originally Posted by slobthanob

Sounds like something Danielle would do...

[Littleroc]

Ok, this whole bb amazes me, providers and hobbiests saying they wouldn't see someone that does bb, we all do bb with someone or two, and all of us have fucked bb more than one person in our lives.... So big deal...so we put on condoms and play safe regardless of who does bb, spanky barebacks me then are y'all not going to see him when he wears a condom, this whole discussion makes me laugh that some wouldn't see someone that is known to bareback, we all barebacks someone or something,lol

[Vannah]

Originally Posted by Littleroc

and all of us have fucked bb more than one person in our lives.

Speak for yourself. Not everyone gets down like that.