Twitter and Facebook

[1pittsburgh]

The members of the cult continue to demonstrate their ignorance.

[berryberry]

Originally Posted by kajotaene

The problem isn't that twitter or Facebook ban people, it's that twitter and Facebook are too big. They control too much of social media. If we had 30 twitters and facebooks or we had an open protocols for our own facebook or twitter 'feeds' (like email), there would be no problem.

Exactly - and when Big Tech said if you don't like our platform, start your own and Parler did - Big Tech said how dare you and conspired to removed them from the internet

Why is Big tech and the left afraid of free speech and competition?

[1pittsburgh]

Originally Posted by berryberry

Oh look - just as I stated - more proof that the problem is the liberals here are consumed with hatred and cheer this censorship on rather than recognizing it as an assault on the rights of all Americans.

1. Just because some conservatives have not been purged from Twitter or censored doesn't mean that over 70,000 weren't.

2. You obviously have a comprehension issue if you can't understand the evidence showing how Google, Apple and Amazon conspired to remove Parler from the internet in order to silence opposing opinions. All while Amazon was selling shirts that say "Kill All Republicans"

1. When millions of people are still parroting conservative talking points on Twitter, and a relatively small amount of conservatives were banned, along with a relatively small amount of liberals who also violated the terms, the logical reasoning would be that they were not banned for being politically conservative. You can go on Twitter right now and praise reaganomics, praise the police, say you don't think gay people should be married, etc., and you won't be banned. Apparently logical reasoning isn't your strong suit.

2. What evidence do you have that they conspired? Have you read the contracts between parler and these companies? Are you sure that parler did not violate the terms of the contracts in any way? Aren't conservatives supposed to be logical and factual? Your posts are continually devoid of those things. BTW, I just typed "kill all republicans shirt" into Amazon and no shirts of that nature came up, but a shirt that said "guns don't kill people, Clinton's do" came up. More evidence that your claim is a lie. Why are you so averse to the truth? Why do you parrot your masters without even first going to Amazon and seeing if it's true?

[Dreamgurrl]

In case you guys haven’t heard Berry knows everything and is the foremost authority on EVERY topic and he is never wrong. I know, I know it doesn’t make sense, but I’m sure he will berrysplain it to you.

Berry ‘Splains it all!

Oh Facebook sucks I haven’t used it for like 7 years.

[berryberry]

Originally Posted by 1pittsburgh

1. When millions of people are still parroting conservative talking points on Twitter, and a relatively small amount of conservatives were banned, along with a relatively small amount of liberals who also violated the terms, the logical reasoning would be that they were not banned for being politically conservative. You can go on Twitter right now and praise reaganomics, praise the police, say you don't think gay people should be married, etc., and you won't be banned. Apparently logical reasoning isn't your strong suit.

2. What evidence do you have that they conspired? Have you read the contracts between parler and these companies? Are you sure that parler did not violate the terms of the contracts in any way? Aren't conservatives supposed to be logical and factual? Your posts are continually devoid of those things. BTW, I just typed "kill all republicans shirt" into Amazon and no shirts of that nature came up, but a shirt that said "guns don't kill people, Clinton's do" came up. More evidence that your claim is a lie. Why are you so averse to the truth? Why do you parrot your masters without even first going to Amazon and seeing if it's true?

1. One person illegally censored for simply being conservative is too many. If Big Tech can censor / remove congresswomen or the President of the United States, they can get away with removing anyone for their political ideology. And no, Twitter did not ban leftists. Shoot here is one Black Lives Matter / Antifa moron who was arrested for instigating the Capital Riot and he still is active on Twitter

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/lef...witter-youtube



2. Read the lawsuit. Amazon was required to give Parler 30 days notice to terminate their hosting agreement, they gave 1. Google and Apple and Amazon all acted in concert within roughly 24 hours of each other. Try using common sense for a change. Oh here is the shirt Amazon was selling:



Perhaps they now finally removed it after conservative media exposed them and called them out for selling 204 items that promote hate and violence

[1pittsburgh]

IDK who lies, backpedals, and moves the goalposts more, you or Trump. Trump was banned for violating the terms of service he agreed to, as were the rest of the 70,000 and some radical leftists as well. Will you ever tell the truth?


You haven't read the contract. You don't know if there's any lanugage that would void the 30 day notice. Amazon still has the "Guns don't kill people, Clintons do" shirts for sale, as well as Trump swag, conservative literature, disrespected American flags, etc. So much for your bogus claim of discrimination based on politics.

[1pittsburgh]

And BTW, berry, you still haven't proposed your solution to this "problem," because you're still caught in that catch 22 there.

[berryberry]

Originally Posted by 1pittsburgh

IDK who lies, backpedals, and moves the goalposts more, you or Trump. Trump was banned for violating the terms of service he agreed to, as were the rest of the 70,000 and some radical leftists as well. Will you ever tell the truth?


You haven't read the contract. You don't know if there's any lanugage that would void the 30 day notice. Amazon still has the "Guns don't kill people, Clintons do" shirts for sale, as well as Trump swag, conservative literature, disrespected American flags, etc. So much for your bogus claim of discrimination based on politics.

LOL, I am not sure if you are purposely obtuse or just plain ignorant of the facts. More par for the course garbage from you not even worth any further response

[berryberry]

Still happening - just today:

Orwellian! Twitter Suspends Gateway Pundit Account for Violating “Civic Integrity” Rule — No Questioning of Election Results Allowed!

They suspended @RSBNetwork Twitter account with no explanation.

America First Patriot @michellemalkin suspended By Twitter:
“Twitter doesn't want me expressing my opinions 24 hours before inauguration. No reason given, but of course we know the reason. If you're on Twitter, spread the word. Thanks.” -@michellemalkin

Welcome to the new world order where free speech does not exist and dissent is not allowed.

[1pittsburgh]

Now a Russian company is reportedly helping Parler get back up and running. If this was a movie plot, I'd say it's a ridiculous movie. Trumpism is stranger than fiction. Such patriots. LOL

[berryberry]

Originally Posted by 1pittsburgh

Now a Russian company is reportedly helping Parler get back up and running. If this was a movie plot, I'd say it's a ridiculous movie. Trumpism is stranger than fiction. Such patriots. LOL

So Russia supports free speech more than Big Tech and the Democrats. That speaks volumes about how concerning this assault on civil liberties by Big Tech and the Democrats is.

[IMGTH58]

Originally Posted by berryberry

So Russia supports free speech more than Big Tech and the Democrats. That speaks volumes about how concerning this assault on civil liberties by Big Tech and the Democrats is.

Oh dear God, you have to be joking! Russia, the exemplar of free speech? Putin, who poisons, murders and imprisons his opposition? The only interest Russia has in U.S. "free speech" is to sow discontent and destabilize. It's done a fine job so far. Trump has done nothing but suck up to Putin, praising his predatory nature, excusing his bad behavior, pining to have his dictatorial powers.

[1pittsburgh]

Originally Posted by IMGTH58

Oh dear God, you have to be joking! Russia, the exemplar of free speech? Putin, who poisons, murders and imprisons his opposition? The only interest Russia has in U.S. "free speech" is to sow discontent and destabilize. It's done a fine job so far. Trump has done nothing but suck up to Putin, praising his predatory nature, excusing his bad behavior, pining to have his dictatorial powers.

Exactly. Same reason why they wanted the racist con man elected in the first place. They couldn't care less about freedom of speech (a concept berry doesn't seem to understand anyways). They just want what's worst for the USA.

There seems to be no limit to the amount of ignorance displayed by Cult 45 members.

[jmichael]

Berry, you still didn't answer the original question of the post. In fact I've ask you several questions in your posts and you don't ever answer the questions, you talk around them. Did you ever think of running in politics?
one more observation, if anyone one here is "consumed by hatred" it's you, BTW when is the next local QAnon meeting?

[berryberry]

Originally Posted by IMGTH58

Oh dear God, you have to be joking! Russia, the exemplar of free speech? Putin, who poisons, murders and imprisons his opposition? The only interest Russia has in U.S. "free speech" is to sow discontent and destabilize. It's done a fine job so far. Trump has done nothing but suck up to Putin, praising his predatory nature, excusing his bad behavior, pining to have his dictatorial powers.

Hey, I am not the one who said "Now a Russian company is reportedly helping Parler get back up and running"

I simply pointed out that by doing so, Russia is supporting free speech more than Big Tech and the Democrats who worked together to remove Parler, a free speech alternative to Twitter

Do you dislike free speech ?