How will you read it?

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

In June 2018 William Barr sent an unsolicited 20 page memo to the Justice Department critiquing special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian election interference. The memo questions the scope of the inquiry and it argues that Mueller should not be permitted to demand answers from the president about possible obstruction of justice based on attempts by Trump to pressure former FBI Director James Comey to drop the investigation of Trump's former ex-National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. This person is then subsequently chosen to replace Jeff Sessions as Attorney General of the United States.

How are we to believe that he won't shade the report in the best possible light toward the President and his administration when he has already made his bias public. The problem as I see it is not what the Mueller report says but that there is no confidence that we'll see a full and unbiased report from the Attorney General.

and YOU never will, me either. sorry citizen you don't have the right to see it, completely unredacted because that happens to be against the law.


if the initial summary by Barr had indicated anything unfavorable you'd be shouting from the roof tops. now like the rest of the TDS sufferers you "want" that report so you can "know" the real truth.


Sorry Sport!

you get only what Barr releases.

and yes the MSM is already trying desperately to claim .. via anonymous source as always .. that members of Mueller's team are claiming there's evidence of "bad deeds".

define "bad deed" in the absence of a indictment, would ya? i'm confused.

https://www.rollingstone.com/politic...uction-817555/


last warning before you click that link ... it's Rolling Stone and the usual "unnamed sources" thingy.

don't get your hopes up. Again.


BAHHAA

[Jackie S]

Originally Posted by Hotrod511

Well if that's what he did than why didn't Mueller recommend charges

Of course the idea was to make up a crime, then spend 2 years trying to do the old "gotcha" game.

It's going to come back on the Dems. Barr threw that little "we are looking into what started this whole thing", and the entire anti-Trump crowd shit in their pants.

I will settle for no less than 5:AM raids with 25 SWAT team men in full combat gear, Perp Walk in handcuffs to the car, followed by complete bankruptcy paying layers.

Fuck em all.

[gnadfly]

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

In June 2018 William Barr sent an unsolicited 20 page memo to the Justice Department critiquing special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian election interference. The memo questions the scope of the inquiry and it argues that Mueller should not be permitted to demand answers from the president about possible obstruction of justice based on attempts by Trump to pressure former FBI Director James Comey to drop the investigation of Trump's former ex-National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. This person is then subsequently chosen to replace Jeff Sessions as Attorney General of the United States.

How are we to believe that he won't shade the report in the best possible light toward the President and his administration when he has already made his bias public. The problem as I see it is not what the Mueller report says but that there is no confidence that we'll see a full and unbiased report from the Attorney General.

So? Here's the bottom line: The Special Council could not find "collusion." Given that, an investigation shouldn't have even been formed to investigate Trump.

This was a soft coup on the Presidency. If Sessions wouldn't have been fired and Barr not appointed, the investigation would still be ongoing. They've known there was no collusion for over a year.

[bamscram]

I expected nothing less, you did not disappoint.

[txdot-guy]

I think you are all missing the point. By putting in someone with the appearance of bias Trump has guaranteed that there will always be questions surrounding the redacted Mueller report. Trump obviously doesn't have to convince many of the people in this forum. (many of which are rabid trump supporters) He needs to convince the independents out there that can be swayed from their position. He can't do that without appearing to release the report in it's entirety or at least by letting an unbiased person do the redaction before release.

[Jaxson66]

Barr has lost all credibility with his summary and his redacted version isn’t likely to be different. If there is an attempt at a cover up I believe the whole report will be leaked. Barr isn’t the only person with a complete copy.

[Jackie S]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Barr has lost all credibility with his summary and his redacted version isn’t likely to be different. If there is an attempt at a cover up I believe the whole report will be leaked. Barr isn’t the only person with a complete copy.

Barr gets raked over the coals for simply following the law.

Once again, we are in "Bizzaro World", where up is down, lies are the truth, and breaking the law is the correct thing to do.

If the Democrats pass a resolution saying that they wanted the entire report, unredacted, Barr should empanel a Grand Jury to look into charges of aiding and abetting a Felony.

But the DBD's could care less. They will keep this charade going as long as they can.

[gnadfly]

[gnadfly]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Barr has lost all credibility with his summary and his redacted version isn’t likely to be different. If there is an attempt at a cover up I believe the whole report will be leaked. Barr isn’t the only person with a complete copy.

Laughable.

If Barr had lost all credibility, Mueller would have corrected him. Mueller already correct Buzzfeed.

Think before you drink...the Kool-Aid.

[Jaxson66]

Originally Posted by gnadfly

Laughable.

If Barr had lost all credibility, Mueller would have corrected him. Mueller already correct Buzzfeed.

Think before you drink...the Kool-Aid.

Barr is losing public support daily along with the rest of Putin’s punk’s administration. If you actually believe Barr has the only copy of the Mueller report then you’re the one standing in the Jim Jones cocktail line.

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Your premise is false from the start.

BAHHAAAAAA

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

In June 2018 William Barr sent an unsolicited 20 page memo to the Justice Department critiquing special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian election interference. The memo questions the scope of the inquiry and it argues that Mueller should not (NOT CAN NOT) be permitted to demand answers from the president about possible obstruction of justice based on attempts by Trump to pressure former FBI Director James Comey to drop the investigation of Trump's former ex-National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. This person is then subsequently chosen to replace Jeff Sessions as Attorney General of the United States.

How are we to believe that he won't shade the report in the best possible light toward the President and his administration when he has already made his bias public. The problem as I see it is not what the Mueller report says but that there is no confidence that we'll see a full and unbiased report from the Attorney General.

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

and YOU never will, me either. sorry citizen you don't have the right to see it, completely unredacted because that happens to be against the law.

you get only what Barr releases.

define "bad deed" in the absence of a indictment, would ya? i'm confused.

BAHHAA

Ask this guy to define it.

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

I think you are all missing the point. By putting in someone with the appearance of bias Trump has guaranteed that there will always be questions surrounding the redacted Mueller report. Trump obviously doesn't have to convince many of the people in this forum.

Circle-jerk around here.

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Barr has lost all credibility with his summary and his redacted version isn’t likely to be different. If there is an attempt at a cover up I believe the whole report will be leaked. Barr isn’t the only person with a complete copy.

I think the coverup has to be proven first. There has to be someone within the swamp to blow the wistle to be another Deep Throat.

Originally Posted by Jackie S

Barr gets raked over the coals for simply following the law.

Once again, we are in "Bizzaro World", where up is down, lies are the truth, and breaking the law is the correct thing to do.

I think this can be taken to the Nth degree. This will go to the SCOTUS. By then the can will be so dented and dirty from being kicked that we'll know who won the game of thrones. (Do I mean HBO? OR, do I mean the throne at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue?)

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Barr is losing public support daily along with the rest of Putin’s punk’s administration. If you actually believe Barr has the only copy of the Mueller report then you’re the one standing in the Jim Jones cocktail line.

you have the worst case of TDS ever recorded on ECCIE.

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Ask this guy to define it.

Circle-jerk around here.



I think the coverup has to be proven first. There has to be someone within the swamp to blow the wistle to be another Deep Throat.



I think this can be taken to the Nth degree. This will go to the SCOTUS. By then the can will be so dented and dirty from being kicked that we'll know who won the game of thrones. (Do I mean HBO? OR, do I mean the throne at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue?)

[eccieuser9500]

Like memes.

[Jaxson66]

And you use a great deal of bytes to say nothing. So adios, you’re in the ignore file now.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

And you use a great deal of bytes to say nothing. So adios, you’re in the ignore file now.