It baffles me how much of a hard-on Conservatives have for the Police state in the U.S.

[Ripmany]

Yes it rat chase, the democratic are for power such as gun banning, woman rights, victim rights, and heavy regulations, the Republicans are for and police to police the Democrat regulations. There no winning not worth voting any more.

[the_real_Barleycorn]

I guess the Antifa guys don't do much thinking. They just follow orders. Only a complete idiot would think conservatives would give up our weapons to anyone. Which kind of invalidates any thing else the red party hat has to say.

[gnadfly]

The OP is fixated on conservatives wangs, just like some other poster who is now banned.

Nobody here wants a police state. We less govt and rule of law enforced.

You're easily confused.

[redpartyhat]

Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

I guess the Antifa guys don't do much thinking. They just follow orders. Only a complete idiot would think conservatives would give up our weapons to anyone. Which kind of invalidates any thing else the red party hat has to say.

Are you aware of Google? Type "Trump bans assault rifle bump stocks". I'd recommend keeping in touch with the news before making these types of comments. Your inability to even keep up with the news of our President kind of invalidates anything else you have to say.

The OP is fixated on conservatives wangs, just like some other poster who is now banned.

Nobody here wants a police state. We less govt and rule of law enforced.

You're easily confused.

I'm fixated on the majority of conservatives in this country. The current attitude to the current police sates suggests otherwise. It's easy to say "less govt" but nothing suggests it ever coming into practice.

[the_real_Barleycorn]

Try to keep up with common sense. Since when is a bump stock a weapon? Never, except to morons.

[Why_Yes_I_Do]

Originally Posted by redpartyhat

...social security they receive. ..

Seems my paychecks and resulting W2s show I pay into Social Security for a long, long time, with the express purpose being that I will get it returned in the future. I also expect to be able to withdraw my money from the bank I deposit it in.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by redpartyhat

I'm fixated on the majority of conservatives in this country. The current attitude to the current police sates suggests otherwise. It's easy to say "less govt" but nothing suggests it ever coming into practice.

It baffles me how much of a hard-on Conservatives have for the Police state in the U.S.

Is there a difference between "Police state" and "police sates"?

Perhaps you should move to Minnesota .... they need more wackos.

[oeb11]

"Bump stocks' - were used in the las Vegas shooting - and are a cheap method of converting a semi-automatic rifle to a full auto weapon.

Such legal Fa weapons are controlled carefully by the NFA Act of 1986 and the BATFE - and reasonably so.



Banning bump stocks was a reasonable act to curb violence by extremists.

If u want a Fa weapon - go through theTtax Stamp process - and if approved by the BATFE - U can own an Fa weapon legally.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by oeb11

If u want a Fa weapon - go through theTtax Stamp process - and if approved by the BATFE - U can own an Fa weapon legally.

Or just PM Lucas who is posting in this forum and he'll send you one ....

.... you might have to buy some extra rounds though!

[redpartyhat]

Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

Try to keep up with common sense. Since when is a bump stock a weapon? Never, except to morons.

Since when are bullets, silencers, scopes, laser sights, and magazines weapons? Why not just ban everything that makes a gun functional? This is why I can’t take leftists seriously.

Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

Seems my paychecks and resulting W2s show I pay into Social Security for a long, long time, with the express purpose being that I will get it returned in the future. I also expect to be able to withdraw my money from the bank I deposit it in.

You’ve described a ponzi scheme. How do I opt out if this?

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Is there a difference between "Police state" and "police sates"?

Perhaps you should move to Minnesota .... they need more wackos.

When the only way you can defend your worldview is pointing out a typo, you should pause for a moment and consider that you believe in bullshit.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by redpartyhat

When the only way you can defend your worldview is pointing out a typo, you should pause for a moment and consider that you believe in bullshit.

When there is only form and no substance to your posts ...

... what's left? Actually, when liberal loudmouths post bullshit in here with their talking-down-to-everyone attitude and portraying they are smarter and more educated ....

... it's a pleasure to catch them making errors in substance as much as in form ...

"defend" ... ? Defend what? Exercising which Constitutional Amendment must I defend ...

.... according to a CommunistSocialistLiberalAntiT rumper like you?

[HedonistForever]

Originally Posted by redpartyhat

I do agree that the majority are just Republicans who tout Conservatism but don’t actually know what it means to be Conservative. We are on a hooker website after all so it’s literally impossible for anyone here to be “Conservative”.

Before Trump got nominated, many actual Conservatives actually attempted to prevent Trump from being the Republican candidate, and I admire their efforts. With Trump, Republican ideology is more backwards and illogical then the most hardcore ANTIFA lefties.

Like wtf is a Republican?

First you state what you think a Conservative is, which begs the question, do you get to decide that or does the individual get to decide that, because unless it is defined by law, we each get to label ourselves any way we choose IMHO.


And then you ask what a Republican is which begs the question "why didn't you start by asking what a Conservative is before giving your definition"? Try being consistent in your reasoning.


I consider my self Conservative on some matters, fiscal, law and order on a community, state and federal level and a strong military. "What do you call the second strongest military"? The loser!


And Liberal on matters such as this "hobby" we enjoy. Add gambling, an individuals right to responsibly use the drug of their choice and be punished under the law for using a drug irresponsibly like driving under the influence. I believe there are conditions under which an abortion should be legal and shouldn't be legal but that's a long detailed conversation.


So labeling oneself a Conservative IMHO doesn't mean you have to be against being able to exchange money for intimacy, anti- abortion, anti-drug use, which is why although many of my choices come down on the Conservative side of the ledger, a ledger I get to decide, I am also a Liberal which is why I call myself an Independent. I'm guessing that is why anybody calls themselves an Independent, because they have doth Conservative and Liberal ideas


It is people who are "rigid" in their ideology, all of one or the other, that I find troubling and probably leans more towards brainwashing than being brought up to have an open mind and decide things for ones self.


So no, it is not impossible to have some Conservative leanings and be on an escort board. I chose that word because I don't believe in denigrating women with a label they do not choose for themselves and I'm suspicious of anybody that would label themselves a Liberal and choose the word you did. This whole idea of "choosing" a word or words to describe oneself has gotten a lot more complicated in recent years. Now there are laws for some people like teachers and others in positions of authority within some businesses, that you must check with each and every person you have dominion over, as to how they want to be addressed because if you choose wrong and there are I'm told, 37 ( give or take ) ways to address ones preferred gender, or you could be reprimanded and even fired and fined if you do not "follow the rules" a definition you probably believe is a Conservative trait but now, following the rules IMHO has been seized by the Liberals and carried to an extreme that use to be IMHO associated with Conservatives but this is again, my personal opinion.


You seem to be all over the place in assigning actions and thoughts to Conservative and Liberal practices but I just don't feel like addressing each and every one of them at this time.



Wouldn't do me any good anyway, would it.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by HedonistForever

So no, it is not impossible to have some Conservative leanings and be on an escort board.

May be he doesn't like pussy .... so he thinks anyone who likes pussy is a Liberal ...

.... or perhaps he thinks enjoying the company of a female is only a Liberal thing!

[Hotrod511]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

May be he doesn't like pussy .... so he thinks anyone who likes pussy is a Liberal ...

.... or perhaps he thinks enjoying the company of a female is only a Liberal thing!

Liberals are more into the gay thing, red pantie ass would fit right in with the reach around crew of this forum who are mostly banned

[redpartyhat]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

When there is only form and no substance to your posts ...

... what's left? Actually, when liberal loudmouths post bullshit in here with their talking-down-to-everyone attitude and portraying they are smarter and more educated ....

... it's a pleasure to catch them making errors in substance as much as in form ...

"defend" ... ? Defend what? Exercising which Constitutional Amendment must I defend ...

.... according to a CommunistSocialistLiberalAntiT rumper like you?

This is the classic leftist cop-out. Pretend like you can't read and insinuate there isn't a point to defend.

The fact that you're calling me a CommunistSocialistLiberalAntiT rumper for defending the constitution, America, and liberty and pointing out the flaws in the current Republican base that do not stand for these principles shows you aren't someone worth wasting the energy I used in my fingers to type this up. Goodbye.

Originally Posted by HedonistForever

First you state what you think a Conservative is, which begs the question, do you get to decide that or does the individual get to decide that, because unless it is defined by law, we each get to label ourselves any way we choose IMHO.


And then you ask what a Republican is which begs the question "why didn't you start by asking what a Conservative is before giving your definition"? Try being consistent in your reasoning.


I consider my self Conservative on some matters, fiscal, law and order on a community, state and federal level and a strong military. "What do you call the second strongest military"? The loser!


And Liberal on matters such as this "hobby" we enjoy. Add gambling, an individuals right to responsibly use the drug of their choice and be punished under the law for using a drug irresponsibly like driving under the influence. I believe there are conditions under which an abortion should be legal and shouldn't be legal but that's a long detailed conversation.


So labeling oneself a Conservative IMHO doesn't mean you have to be against being able to exchange money for intimacy, anti- abortion, anti-drug use, which is why although many of my choices come down on the Conservative side of the ledger, a ledger I get to decide, I am also a Liberal which is why I call myself an Independent. I'm guessing that is why anybody calls themselves an Independent, because they have doth Conservative and Liberal ideas


It is people who are "rigid" in their ideology, all of one or the other, that I find troubling and probably leans more towards brainwashing than being brought up to have an open mind and decide things for ones self.


So no, it is not impossible to have some Conservative leanings and be on an escort board. I chose that word because I don't believe in denigrating women with a label they do not choose for themselves and I'm suspicious of anybody that would label themselves a Liberal and choose the word you did. This whole idea of "choosing" a word or words to describe oneself has gotten a lot more complicated in recent years. Now there are laws for some people like teachers and others in positions of authority within some businesses, that you must check with each and every person you have dominion over, as to how they want to be addressed because if you choose wrong and there are I'm told, 37 ( give or take ) ways to address ones preferred gender, or you could be reprimanded and even fired and fined if you do not "follow the rules" a definition you probably believe is a Conservative trait but now, following the rules IMHO has been seized by the Liberals and carried to an extreme that use to be IMHO associated with Conservatives but this is again, my personal opinion.


You seem to be all over the place in assigning actions and thoughts to Conservative and Liberal practices but I just don't feel like addressing each and every one of them at this time.



Wouldn't do me any good anyway, would it.

I stated flaws in the current American Conservative base.
The republican question was in response to another user, see my conversation with him.

Your views are more aligned with Classic Liberalism.

"So labeling oneself a Conservative IMHO doesn't mean you have to be against being able to exchange money for intimacy, anti- abortion, anti-drug use, which is why although many of my choices come down on the Conservative side of the ledger, a ledger I get to decide, I am also a Liberal which is why I call myself an Independent. I'm guessing that is why anybody calls themselves an Independent, because they have doth Conservative and Liberal ideas
"

That's a huge stretch right there, sir. Sure not all conservatives have to agree in the same values, as Conservatives differ throughout the world. But a line has to be drawn somewhere and everything you've stated goes waaayyyy beyond that line. Again the views you're aligned with are much more on the Classic Liberal/Libertarian side.

"It is people who are "rigid" in their ideology, all of one or the other, that I find troubling and probably leans more towards brainwashing than being brought up to have an open mind and decide things for ones self."

That is correct.

"So no, it is not impossible to have some Conservative leanings and be on an escort board. I chose that word because I don't believe in denigrating women with a label they do not choose for themselves and I'm suspicious of anybody that would label themselves a Liberal and choose the word you did. This whole idea of "choosing" a word or words to describe oneself has gotten a lot more complicated in recent years. Now there are laws for some people like teachers and others in positions of authority within some businesses, that you must check with each and every person you have dominion over, as to how they want to be addressed because if you choose wrong and there are I'm told, 37 ( give or take ) ways to address ones preferred gender, or you could be reprimanded and even fired and fined if you do not "follow the rules" a definition you probably believe is a Conservative trait but now, following the rules IMHO has been seized by the Liberals and carried to an extreme that use to be IMHO associated with Conservatives but this is again, my personal opinion.
"

The men and women here are here of their own free will. That is quintessentially American. However, Conservative belief would disagree with this aspect of freedom. Thus they challenge American principles. There are many stances held by American Conservatives that go against American principles (just like a Saudi Conservative stance will go against American principles). I never really got into the social issues because that is another can of worms I'm not going to open.

I focused on the fiscals. Some Conservatives and most Republicans are ok with the massive welfare state and massive government spending. When I attempt to defend the Constitution and American Principles, the users on this site tell me to move to China. It's testimony to how far we've strayed from the vision this country was founded on.