Is it just me, it has this been the week of the WKs?

[guest071618-1]

Originally Posted by Mojojo

You've only done 1 review correctly and the rest you posted without clicking new review button or you've edited the title thus causing them not to appear on your counter. I bet you did the first one though..

I have no idea how I posted... I just know I posted abt 5 reviews... I posted all reviews from my phone on Mobil site... Don't see new review button.

[bojulay]

I thought obamacare was suppose to fix all this

[Mojojo]

Aye eh you see it now? It's there...what you did.

[oldbutstillgoing]

Originally Posted by !VI!

lol yes, it can very easily change a girls total income. especially since many guys argue rates based on reviews here

Yea, it typically changes it upwards as increases her visibility and many guys will disregard the bad stuff no matter how bad it is.

[Hercules]

Originally Posted by Zerox

I guess I don't understand the argument of how it hurts the lady?

In a word DRAMA. And it doesn't take much of it for me to avoid a gal.

[Zerox]

Ok yeah I get the drama, but to me it doesn't change who is already to going to see someone. I'm just saying that for a majority it seems like we're set in our ways of what we're going to do. And if you have a firm wall of sparkling reviews backing you, it seems that the drama is just white noise that bitches on here like to unnecessarily bring up.

[Prolongus]

Raise your hand if you've ever read stupid shit about a girl here that you know is wrong, wanted to defend her publicly but didn't for fear of the WK label.

[Zerox]

So why exactly do the people standing up for the provider normally get burned too?

For instance if a thread starts off positively, talking about the good characteristics of the provider, and then other trolls come in and start bringing in drama...why is the person who tries to mitigate these comments killed and ridiculed?

Just saying, the people introducing the drama aren't necessarily these WKs, but normally bored people trying to start something.

[TinMan]

Originally Posted by Prolongus

Raise your hand if you've ever read stupid shit about a girl here that you know is wrong, wanted to defend her publicly but didn't for fear of the WK label.

Not me, but I'm pretty good at saying it once (and trying to not be over-the-top about it), and if guys don't believe me letting it go.

[jdkees]

<---- THIS THREAD

[TinMan]

Oh, well, jdkees, they can't all be hall-of-fame quality.

[Bad_Mojo]

Originally Posted by eng

Seeing 8+ dick a day = $2,400 a day/$72,000 a month,,

Eight $300/hr sessions EVERY day?

That is one HDH with an amazing work ethic.

[DarkeyKong]

I am under the impression that the plight against the "white knights" of ECCIE is a noble one.

Firstly, I believe that a lot of the more experienced guys have at once been smitten by a provider and in essence became guilty of "falling too hard" for her. This is a dangerous state to be in as one would tend to try to establish connections that aren't there. Also, they would try to project unrealistic expectations on said provider as if they were in a relationship. I think the veteran hobbyist on this board have the realization that falling for a provider in this manner can only end badly. With that being said, when they see the symptoms of White Knightism, they attack like the noble white blood cells they are.

Also, deterring this type of behavior on these boards is beneficial for the providers as well, ensuring their safety and keeps the number of potential stalkers and obsessed psychopaths at bay.

Everyone knows these ladies have the inner strength to fend for themselves without the help of WK's potentially making a situation worse. Also, a white knights eyes are blinded to reality so he can never truly "know" anything about a provider. These render the plight of the white knight useless.

WK'ing is a completely useless tool which can only lead to bad things, so it's best to bend the tree as a sapling as opposed to breaking it once it is fully developed.

[TinMan]

Thanks, DarkeyKong, for redeeming my crappy thread. Damn fine post. I'd need at least 3 martinis to come up with something so eloquent. And on point.

[Chung Tran]

Originally Posted by TinMan

Thanks, DarkeyKong, for redeeming my crappy thread. Damn fine post. I'd need at least 3 martinis to come up with something so eloquent. And on point.

you're welcome TinMan.. I (we) try to highlight areas that can improve the functionality of the forum.. I should probably post this as DK since some may be confused.. especially since Tran never rises to this level of eloquence..