Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Joe Smith · 09-12-2010, 04:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SweetAterPie

When placing a custom printing order for M&M's the word booty, bootie, or any derivative terms are prohibited.

LL & OTHERS SPARE US THE MANIFESTOS.

Though you are gods please condense the content for those of us of simpler minds.

Or consider that your posting is not a requirement on every thread.
Few are those that are laid by your prose.

That's funny SAP. Some guys take themselves way too seriously on this board. And even more funny, they naively think other guys take them equally as serious as well. To the OP, I hope starting this thread gives you the validation you seek, whatever the fuck that may be.

Just curious, does anyone actually read these long winded posts from start to finish?

hotlips_houlihan · 09-12-2010, 04:10 AM

You guys leave looie alone. He's a stand up guy and has the respect of many of the ladies here. Lay off the hatorade.

Joe Smith · 09-12-2010, 05:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hotlips_houlihan

You guys leave looie alone. He's a stand up guy and has the respect of many of the ladies here. Lay off the hatorade.

Meg, maybe the OP is a stand up guy but my problem is his propensity to comment on reviews that he was not privy to. Like the Steve Sanderson review. He said it was bullshit. Was he there? The provider, or whomever wrote on her behalf, actually confirmed the damn review that he flamed.

And just for the record, and off the subject, what a creepy fucking guy you are Sanderson. You go bareback on this barely legal teen who is new and does not know the business, and you have the nerve to write a bad review? I just wish you would have tried to pull that shit on a more seasoned provider so you would have had your ass handed to you, you predator. You're a fucking creep and a scumbag. Geez, what that the fuck is wrong with you?

Anyway, I don't know why the OP would call "bullshit" on a session he did not attend. That's not being a WK, that's just being a dumbass know it all. Like the OP, I can't stand Sanderson either but you can't make definitive comments like you know what actually happened at a session that you were not a party to. That's just foolish to me.

Randy4Candy · 09-12-2010, 07:42 AM

Ah, the perils of recreational sex.

To all you HATERS: Do not have an original thought, much less express it, especially if it runs counter to the curious political correctness some would impose.

To all you WKs: Thank you for continually keeping near to your heart, and all's eyes, the nice experiences gathered.

Since WALDT, we just need to figure out who's what.

In the mean time, repeat after me, "I know you are, but what am I?"

guest040711-1 · 09-12-2010, 09:20 AM

The problem with labels is there are too many CFI's that don't understand how to voice a differing opinion without resorting to name calling.

When a hundred people testify a lady is YMWV they think she does not have the right to vary her service, afterall they searched for her cheapest rate and by golly she better overlook their overweight smelly ass and do what they want.

lisa.lisa0302 · 09-12-2010, 10:51 AM

I saw this thread, read it, and clicked the back button. "Meh" ......I thought

Sorry I do not know the meaning of WK, maybe I drank too much hatorade, Im not part of the in- crowd, is that is a requirement? I have not seen well-known members of the board. Is that a requirement to?

Are WK's bias to only people they have had a session with, because frankly I would be on the losing team passing out water and towels.

Now on the other hand, I have WK'ed for several providers, and continue to do so. But well, im kinda short on WK's for myself.....shucks im sipping hatorade.....sue me.

Interesting thread loouie....good read.

TexRich · 09-12-2010, 11:41 AM

so I guess WKs are in vogue this season

Fort Worth Punk · 09-12-2010, 11:48 AM

When white knights push for honesty and fairness, they are doing good. When a reviewer is being cruel, obviously lying or has an axe to grind, someone speaking out is a good thing.

However when a guy always sides with the lady regardless of the facts, or make excuses/justification, they aren't doing anyone any favors. In fact, their defense tends to be so vehement that they guarantee that a negative post or review remains in the eyes of potential clients for much longer, and they usually associate the lady with the one thing almost every guy agrees they don't want to deal with: drama.

Don't assume all white knights are doing you any favors. It may feel good to have someone stand up for you, but in an awful lot of cases they are doing more long term harm to your reputation than you realize.

hotlips_houlihan · 09-12-2010, 11:56 AM

Joe Smith,

How I interpreted Looie's post about the review was that steve was going back and forth with his facts. Things were not adding up. Because when I read what steve was saying I thought "wait a minute, if she sucked the first time why did you go back?" It wasn't until later in the post were the facts about the 2 visits made clear. Maybe I'm wrong, but that is what I "think" looie was trying to say. I dunno.

Lisa, a WK is somebody who will stand up for their favorites no matter what, i.e. if a negative review comes out of their favorite lady, a WK is going to step in and fluff her up even if the facts are true.

daty/o · 09-12-2010, 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Smith

That's funny SAP. Some guys take themselves way too seriously on this board. And even more funny, they naively think other guys take them equally as serious as well. To the OP, I hope starting this thread gives you the validation you seek, whatever the fuck that may be.

Just curious, does anyone actually read these long winded posts from start to finish?

Yep

Quote:

Originally Posted by hotlips_houlihan

Lisa, a WK is somebody who will stand up for their favorites no matter what, i.e. if a negative review comes out of their favorite lady, a WK is going to step in and fluff her up even if the facts are true.

HH, this is too often the case, but not the intent. It is also why people like JS feel like WK's are full of shit. Hopefully Looie and the rest of us that want to keep things on as positive a note as possible will be able to change that perception by taking a more objective position and basing our comments more on fact than emotion. Tinman has the right idea. We need to be Grey Knights.

TinMan · 09-12-2010, 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by esteve

Tinman has the right idea. We need to be Grey Knights.

Ah, finally... someone who gets me....

Oops...slipped over from grey knight to ghey knight for a minute!

daddyo67 · 09-12-2010, 05:19 PM

I've always got you TM, every girl that you have reviewed that have I seen was a corbon copy of my experince also. best review I ever read was on ASPD near the end in the locker room of you doing a double. I cried, laughed till my stomach hurt and felt sorry for you and you became my favorite poster.

looie's not far behind

TinMan · 09-12-2010, 05:28 PM

Thanks, daddyo. I think I cried that night, too. Like a little girl.

BigEddie · 09-12-2010, 05:54 PM

Defending a provider when she is wronged is noble, but the only issue when a few guys defend them no matter if the provider is in the right or wrong, and no matter if the defender has any facts or not.

It's okay to state you had a good time with a lady. What annoys me are the guys who basically say that since they had a good time, it's impossible that someone else didn't and turn it into a bash fest against the reviewer. Providers are human. They have bad days. They sometimes don't click with the nicest of guys.