Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
649 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Jon Bon |
398 |
Harley Diablo |
377 |
honest_abe |
362 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
Starscream66 |
281 |
You&Me |
281 |
George Spelvin |
270 |
sharkman29 |
256 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 70818 | biomed1 | 63570 | Yssup Rider | 61189 | gman44 | 53322 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 48784 | WTF | 48267 | pyramider | 46370 | bambino | 43102 | The_Waco_Kid | 37343 | CryptKicker | 37228 | Mokoa | 36497 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
05-30-2010, 10:48 PM
|
#16
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Dec 25, 2009
Location: South of the Kennebec
Posts: 1,767
|
It's not Beaurty; It's A Descriptive Category
Cpalmson,
It isn't a matter of subjective beauty. This girl got me all hot and bothered despite her dimensions. I could say she's 5'6" and 150 lbs but it could be 170 and I ain't gonna ask. It is more in the descriptive possibilities. With all deference to those who suggest MM or Cindy Crawford are BBW's, to compare my friend to those icons of beauty is both laughable and inaccurate. My friend may be a size 10 but she is multiples of my size 2 (or 0) ex.
What I'm searching for is a reasonable label or description so I can write a credible review that conveys both her "thickness" and her beauty. The cliches and norms of facial beauty are easy but not so for heft. I thought Rubenesque might work since P.P.'s works are accessible on the internet, but sadly the adjective might be missed by many.
There has to be a word or phrase that captures this girl's body type that is accurate but not perjorative.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
05-30-2010, 11:12 PM
|
#17
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jul 9, 2009
Location: Northwest OKC
Posts: 163
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by awl4knot
Cpalmson,
It isn't a matter of subjective beauty. This girl got me all hot and bothered despite her dimensions. I could say she's 5'6" and 150 lbs but it could be 170 and I ain't gonna ask. It is more in the descriptive possibilities. With all deference to those who suggest MM or Cindy Crawford are BBW's, to compare my friend to those icons of beauty is both laughable and inaccurate. My friend may be a size 10 but she is multiples of my size 2 (or 0) ex.
What I'm searching for is a reasonable label or description so I can write a credible review that conveys both her "thickness" and her beauty. The cliches and norms of facial beauty are easy but not so for heft. I thought Rubenesque might work since P.P.'s works are accessible on the internet, but sadly the adjective might be missed by many.
There has to be a word or phrase that captures this girl's body type that is accurate but not perjorative.
|
5'6" and 170 isn't a size 10 lol (even accounting for decades of ego sizing)
Much like "BBW", sizes are pretty amorphous...
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
05-30-2010, 11:22 PM
|
#18
|
Account Disabled
User ID: 5290
Join Date: Jan 4, 2010
Location: Chickasha
Posts: 6,111
My ECCIE Reviews
|
Depending on the brand name, I wear a size 10,12, and 14.
I think the review the described me the best was the one that stated...
"not a spinner but sure not bbw, just right milf,"
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
05-30-2010, 11:28 PM
|
#19
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jul 9, 2009
Location: Northwest OKC
Posts: 163
|
Having seen your pics, I wouldn't consider you a BBW Tiffany...I also wouldn't put you at 170.
That's a pretty good description really. Can be so tricky to describe a woman who is neither "big" nor "small"...I doubt many women would be flattered by "average build"
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
05-30-2010, 11:45 PM
|
#20
|
Upgraded Female Account
User ID: 2751
Join Date: Dec 17, 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 5,351
My ECCIE Reviews
|
Weight Chart for Women
Weight in pounds, based on ages 25-59 with the lowest mortality rate
(indoor clothing weighing 3 pounds and shoes with 1" heels)
Small Frame
Medium Frame
Large Frame
4'10"
102-111
109-121
118-131
4'11"
103-113
111-123
120-134
5'0"
104-115
113-126
122-137
5'1"
106-118
115-129
125-140
5'2"
108-121
118-132
128-143
5'3"
111-124
121-135
131-147
5'4"
114-127
124-138
134-151
5'5"
117-130
127-141
137-155
5'6"
120-133
130-144
140-159
5'7"
123-136
133-147
143-163
5'8"
126-139
136-150
146-167
5'9"
129-142
139-153
149-170
5'10"
132-145
142-156
152-173
5'11"
135-148
145-159
155-176
6'0"
138-151
148-162
158-179
Weight Chart for Men
Weight in pounds, based on ages 25-59 with the lowest mortality rate
(indoor clothing weighing 5 pounds and shoes with 1" heels)
Small Frame
Medium Frame
Large Frame
5'2"
128-134
131-141
138-150
5'3"
130-136
133-143
140-153
5'4"
132-138
135-145
142-156
5'5"
134-140
137-148
144-160
5'6"
136-142
139-151
146-164
5'7"
138-145
142-154
149-168
5'8"
140-148
145-157
152-172
5'9"
142-151
148-160
155-176
5'10"
144-154
151-163
158-180
5'11"
146-157
154-166
161-184
6'0"
149-160
157-170
164-188
6'1"
152-164
160-174
168-192
6'2"
155-168
164-178
172-197
6'3"
158-172
167-182
176-202
6'4"
162-176
171-187
181-207
I found this interesting. I am 5'9" (without heels) with a medium frame. I am currently 168- just checked! (I have been on a program. LOL It is working! YAY! ) So I wonder.....what I could be classified as.
KKA
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
05-31-2010, 12:06 AM
|
#21
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Mar 30, 2009
Location: DFW
Posts: 576
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KlassyKelliAnn
... So I wonder.....what I could be classified as.
|
A woman who now holds the record for longest post (in column inches) in recent memory.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
05-31-2010, 12:14 AM
|
#22
|
Upgraded Female Account
User ID: 2751
Join Date: Dec 17, 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 5,351
My ECCIE Reviews
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfred
A woman who now holds the record for longest post (in column inches) in recent memory.
|
LMAO! I know! LOL It did not come out the way it was supposed to at all.
That was too funny! LMAO
Sorry about that!!!!
KKA
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
05-31-2010, 06:28 AM
|
#23
|
Permanently retired
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 7,518
|
I'm one of those clients who has a "fetish" for larger women, I admit it (well, not so much a "fetish" for larger women as rather an avoidance of women who strike me as too skinny; a "rule 100" spinner is probably not the woman for me, unless her reviews suggest that our personalities are going to mesh extremely well)...
I have to confess I've never thought about the whole "BBW"* label though, and its implications. I can't recall if I've ever described a provider as "BBW"; if I have thank heaven she's never taken umbrage at it. Or at least hasn't told me she has... and hasn't refused to see me a second (or more) time because if it.
My favorite descriptive adjectives for my favorite women tend to use some form of the term "curvy". "Well curved", "generously curved", "curvy", or my favorite, "I am a man who believes that God meant for women to have curves, and she has them. Thank you, God!"
Cheers,
bcg
* The most recent time I've been tempted to describe a lady in a review as "BBW" (I didn't give in, though it was a close call), I would have said something like "She's a 'big beautiful woman', with a stress on 'beautiful'; she is without a doubt one of the prettiest women it has ever been my pleasure to meet..."
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
05-31-2010, 06:42 AM
|
#24
|
Permanently retired
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 7,518
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KlassyKelliAnn
Sorry about that!!!!
|
You Are Forgiven.
Speaking of curvy (see my last post)... if your pictures are accurate you're "just right" in my book. If I visit San Antonio will you do me the honor of a romantic stroll along the Riverwalk?
Cheers,
bcg
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
05-31-2010, 09:39 AM
|
#25
|
HELL's bell ringer!!
User ID: 3067
Join Date: Dec 27, 2009
Location: Based in Missouri AND coming to play in your town soon!!!
Posts: 70,818
My ECCIE Reviews
|
hmmm this is interesting!
IN MY OPINION....any woman who stands at attention,and she is wider from her chest to her hips than her shoulders...she is a bbw
Is he is narrower at the top and wider at the hips...she is hippy
I think that this debate will never be solved....lol
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
05-31-2010, 11:55 AM
|
#26
|
Permanently retired
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 7,518
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DallasRain
Is he is narrower at the top and wider at the hips...she is hippy
|
I see what you mean, darlin', but I'm of an age where the term "hippy chick" has a different meaning.
Cheers,
bcg
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
05-31-2010, 12:09 PM
|
#27
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Dec 25, 2009
Location: South of the Kennebec
Posts: 1,767
|
Another Thing to Consider
One thing I noticed was that the lassie had an extremely well-padded pudendum, so much so that I had a hard time getting to her goodies. Let's put it this way: face sitting was a bit challenged. Although the spirit was willing, the tongue was a bit short of the mark.
Is that a "curvy" model thing, or is it more in line with a well-equipped "BBW" model?
Maybe that will focus our discussion a bit.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
05-31-2010, 12:16 PM
|
#28
|
HELL's bell ringer!!
User ID: 3067
Join Date: Dec 27, 2009
Location: Based in Missouri AND coming to play in your town soon!!!
Posts: 70,818
My ECCIE Reviews
|
what would I be considered---5'4/130lbs??? lol
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
05-31-2010, 12:23 PM
|
#29
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Dec 30, 2009
Location: ???
Posts: 114
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DallasRain
what would I be considered---5'4/130lbs??? lol
|
Tasty!
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
05-31-2010, 12:40 PM
|
#30
|
Permanently retired
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 7,518
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by awl4knot
One thing I noticed was that the lassie had an extremely well-padded pudendum, so much so that I had a hard time getting to her goodies. Let's put it this way: face sitting was a bit challenged. Although the spirit was willing, the tongue was a bit short of the mark.
Is that a "curvy" model thing, or is it more in line with a well-equipped "BBW" model?
Maybe that will focus our discussion a bit.
|
Been there, done that, got the t-shirt. However, while face sitting is less an option, there are ways of getting around it (inverted 69, or just going at it from above, as it were, works best, IME, though using your hands to get better target exposure during "conventional" DATY is also an option. Where there's a will, there's a way).
That's a feature of the curvier models on up through BBW, and over (i.e., SSBBW, or "SuperSized BBW").
Cheers,
bcg
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|