Did the CIA elect Joe Biden?

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by texassapper

Plenty of fraud was found.. much of it exceeding the margin of victory... getting it examined and the courts responding to it is what has not occurred.

That is not in dispute.

That is actually not in dispute. It's total bullshit made up by the MAGA bullshit machine and responsible for millions of dollars in wasted taxpayer dollars, the death of a number of participants in the Jan. 6 insurrection and the absolute confirmation that it was utter bullshit from the beginning.

Not that nobody didn't see it coming. EVERYBODY saw it coming. Twitler was still crying about losing the popular vote in 2016 by 3 million votes. It is literally ALL HE DOES.

Yet MAGA zealots continue to righteously chant their mantra at the altar of the golden baby...

The CIA did not elect Biden. The American people REJECTED the MAGA madness and the countless conspiracy theories that have blackened the eye of America. And we will again.

[texassapper]

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

It is very much in dispute. Name some of those examples of fraud that has been found and not yet been debunked.

By Wisconsin state law all teams that collect Nursing home votes had bipartisan representation. The Secretary of State prohibited the Republicans from attending those collections. Turnout in nursing home rates went from 20% to nearly 100%. That affected more ballots than the margin of victory.

Dropboxes were ruled unconstitutional in WI but were used and in one event in Madison 17500 votes were collected.... Biden won that state by 20K

In Fulton County, GA, they didn't even bother to do signature verification on the mail in ballots... that's illegal. that affected tens of thousands of ballots more that the 12,000 vote Biden margin.

In PA there are 120K more ballots than registered voters... Hard to figure that one out eh?

There was election fraud... it was in excess of the victory margins.. but it WASN'T ALLOWED to be investigated in court.

It is what it is... the next fraud the Democrats will execute is with the 22 million illegals voting... because there is no process that prevents an illegal from registering to vote... and that just means 20 million vote by mail ballots will arrive from illegals.

This may be the last election that will matter in this nation. If it doesn't appear to be on the up and up, then that's the end of the Country... there will be no consent to be governed.

I don't care if you don't buy it or believe it. it is what it is...

[Yssup Rider]

Just because you keep repeating the same unproven claims and conspiracy theories doesn’t mean they’re factual.

Trump appointees threw his election challenges out just the same as the regular judges did. Not biased, but based on the rule of law.

I wonder if he wants to purge the judiciary too.

That is, after he’s finished with the CIA and keeps those pesky illegals from voting (snick)!

[SpeedRacerXXX]

Originally Posted by texassapper

By Wisconsin state law all teams that collect Nursing home votes had bipartisan representation. The Secretary of State prohibited the Republicans from attending those collections. Turnout in nursing home rates went from 20% to nearly 100%. That affected more ballots than the margin of victory.

Dropboxes were ruled unconstitutional in WI but were used and in one event in Madison 17500 votes were collected.... Biden won that state by 20K

In Fulton County, GA, they didn't even bother to do signature verification on the mail in ballots... that's illegal. that affected tens of thousands of ballots more that the 12,000 vote Biden margin.

In PA there are 120K more ballots than registered voters... Hard to figure that one out eh?

There was election fraud... it was in excess of the victory margins.. but it WASN'T ALLOWED to be investigated in court.

It is what it is... the next fraud the Democrats will execute is with the 22 million illegals voting... because there is no process that prevents an illegal from registering to vote... and that just means 20 million vote by mail ballots will arrive from illegals.

This may be the last election that will matter in this nation. If it doesn't appear to be on the up and up, then that's the end of the Country... there will be no consent to be governed.

I don't care if you don't buy it or believe it. it is what it is...

None of what you mention prove that a single vote was cast illegally.

There is nothing to support your claim that Republicans were not allowed in nursing homes to monitor voting. Neither Republicans nor Democrats were allowed in.

"The elections commission, split evenly among Republicans and Democrats, in March 2020 voted unanimously that poll workers could not be sent into nursing homes. The commission voted 5-1 in two follow-up votes extending the order through the November 2020 election before rescinding it in March 2021. Instead of sending in voting deputies, the commission directed clerks to mail absentee ballots to nursing home residents who had requested them."

So you are wrong.

https://apnews.com/article/2022-midt...b7b08ec89242f3

Drop boxes were not illegal in Wisconsin in 2020. The Wisconsin Supreme Court declared MOST of them illegal in 2022. But that could change in a new court case. So you are wrong here too.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/ele...xes-rcna151422

No, there were NOT more votes in Pa than registered voters in 2020. Wrong again. Do you see a trend here?

"There were not more votes than voters in Pennsylvania"

https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-9887147615

Mail-in votes in Georgia have the signatures verified 2 times.

"According to Georgia’s secretary of state, when the absentee ballot is initially received, the envelope that contains the voter’s signature is examined. If the absentee ballot was requested by mail, this is the second signature verification, as the voter’s signature was first checked when the application was received. If the absentee ballot was requested online, a photo ID was required and the signature is verified once the ballot was received.

Once the signature is verified as matching the signature on file, the ballot that contains the marked vote but not any identifying information is separated from the envelope that contains the identity of the voter and the voter’s signature. This is by design to protect voter privacy." Wrong once again.

So please try again since all your current claims are incorrect.

[Michael8219]

http://youtu.be/wKhOtZ3F3_k?si=Rrh6qyiDczz4sup4

[Salty Again]

Originally Posted by texassapper

By Wisconsin state law all teams that collect Nursing home votes had bipartisan representation. The Secretary of State prohibited the Republicans from attending those collections. Turnout in nursing home rates went from 20% to nearly 100%. That affected more ballots than the margin of victory.

Dropboxes were ruled unconstitutional in WI but were used and in one event in Madison 17500 votes were collected.... Biden won that state by 20K

In Fulton County, GA, they didn't even bother to do signature verification on the mail in ballots... that's illegal. that affected tens of thousands of ballots more that the 12,000 vote Biden margin.

In PA there are 120K more ballots than registered voters... Hard to figure that one out eh?

There was election fraud... it was in excess of the victory margins.. but it WASN'T ALLOWED to be investigated in court.

It is what it is... the next fraud the Democrats will execute is with the 22 million illegals voting... because there is no process that prevents an illegal from registering to vote... and that just means 20 million vote by mail ballots will arrive from illegals.

This may be the last election that will matter in this nation. If it doesn't appear to be on the up and up, then that's the end of the Country... there will be no consent to be governed.

I don't care if you don't buy it or believe it. it is what it is...

... You're correct there, mate...
And the CIA had a hand in some of it.

#### Salty

[Lucas McCain]

I honestly don't know what planet some of you folks are from.

Is it just me, or does the premise of this stupid ass thread make any logical sense whatsoever? What's next with this conspiracy theory bullshit? Aliens? Imaginary monsters? LOL

[txdot-guy]

Originally Posted by Lucas McCain

I honestly don't know what planet some of you folks are from.

Is it just me, or does the premise of this stupid ass thread make any logical sense whatsoever? What's next with this conspiracy theory bullshit? Aliens? Imaginary monsters? LOL

[Yssup Rider]

They’re looking to make the next installment of the Aliens franchise.

This one will be “Illegal Alien: ELECTION DAY!”

[Yssup Rider]

They’re looking to make the next installment of the Aliens franchise.

This one will be “Illegal Alien: ELECTION DAY!”

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

They’re looking to make the next installment of the Aliens franchise.

This one will be “Illegal Alien: ELECTION DAY!”

if you

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

They’re looking to make the next installment of the Aliens franchise.

This one will be “Illegal Alien: ELECTION DAY!”

say so


bahahahaaaa

[texassapper]

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

None of what you mention prove that a single vote was cast illegally.

Of course it proves NOTHING.. it wasn't allowed to be investigated. your "fact checks" are dated and suspect...so again, I don't really care what your opinion is on the matter.

You fail to understand that the appearance of fraud IS FRAUD. particularly if you aren't allowed to investigate. Preventing Republican observation of the vote counting process is NOT justifiable... and it happened in EVERY SWING STATE in Democrat metro areas...



If you can't bother to even APPEAR to provide fair elections, you will not have the consent of the governed... and then you need to send anyone that questions the "elections" to jail... to shut up the others.

The next step is going to be violence.

Do you think that's desirable?

[Tigbitties38]

You don't question the election.

You make wild claims without evidence and ignore evidence proving you wrong.

It's simple. You supposedly read the articles that provided the false claims you make. Provide those links to us

Many people have provided links that back up our version. If you want a discussion, provide some some links. Without info other than your word, which means NOTHING, without proof.

PS Found this also.

Proof your word is worthless.
You fail to understand your lies are easy to prove as lies.
Investigation into Wisconsin fraud claims weren't allowed?
You're a proven liar.

https://apnews.com/article/2022-midt...5a4024e6fb880c

"Judge: Wisconsin probe found ‘absolutely no’ election fraud

Published 11:12 AM CDT, July 28, 2022

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A Wisconsin judge said Thursday that a Republican-ordered, taxpayer-funded investigation into the 2020 election found “absolutely no evidence of election fraud,” but did reveal contempt for the state’s open records law by Assembly Speaker Robin Vos and a former state Supreme Court justice he hired.

Dane County Circuit Judge Valerie Bailey-Rihn awarded about $98,000 in attorneys’ fees to the liberal watchdog group American Oversight, bringing an end in circuit court to one of four lawsuits the group filed. Vos’s attorney, Ron Stadler, said he was recommending that Vos appeal the ruling.

The fees will be paid by taxpayers, which is why the judge said she was not also awarding additional punitive damages against Vos. Costs to taxpayers for the investigation, including ongoing legal fees, have exceeded $1 million.

Originally Posted by texassapper

Of course it proves NOTHING.. it wasn't allowed to be investigated. Lie! You got caught again. your "fact checks" are dated and suspect...so again, I don't really care what your opinion is on the matter.

You fail to understand that the appearance of fraud IS FRAUD. particularly if you aren't allowed to investigate. Preventing Republican observation of the vote counting process is NOT justifiable.Total bullshit.. and it happened in EVERY SWING STATE in Democrat metro areas.More total bullshit...



If you can't bother to even APPEAR to provide fair elections, you will not have the consent of the governed... and then you need to send anyone that questions the "elections" to jail... to shut up the others.

The next step is going to be violence.Violence by trumpys to back their lies. Any one who participates in your promised violence based on your lies should be prosecuted to fullest extent of the law.

Do you think that's desirable?

[SpeedRacerXXX]

Originally Posted by texassapper

Of course it proves NOTHING.. it wasn't allowed to be investigated. your "fact checks" are dated and suspect...so again, I don't really care what your opinion is on the matter.

You fail to understand that the appearance of fraud IS FRAUD. particularly if you aren't allowed to investigate. Preventing Republican observation of the vote counting process is NOT justifiable... and it happened in EVERY SWING STATE in Democrat metro areas...



If you can't bother to even APPEAR to provide fair elections, you will not have the consent of the governed... and then you need to send anyone that questions the "elections" to jail... to shut up the others.

The next step is going to be violence.

Do you think that's desirable?

Fraud has to be proven, and you have not done so. Every claim of fraud in the 2020 election, to my knowledge, has been investigated and refuted.

As usual, when Trumpettes are presented with FACTS that are contrary to their OPINIONS, the FACTS are "dated and suspect" yet the claims of fraud, none of which have been proven, are valid.

Questioning the validity of an election is fine. Rejecting the results of investigations into those claims of fraud simply because they don't agree with your POV is wrong, which you have consistently been on most issues.

[Yssup Rider]

…or the facts are corrupt. Or evil.

Expect a snowball effect. Trump has spent his entire adult life successfully gaming the legal system at the expense of contractors, banks, the public, etc. He actually thinks he’s smarter than the American justice system.

He isn’t.

He’s just smarter than the poor wretches who think he’s the second coming.