Why must you NEVER write fake reviews?

[tatasddd]

Originally Posted by eyecu2

Stop posting shit from the other side. Even if it is from CG, there is no chain of evidence that can be confirmed and it seems someone here is breaking rules about sharing ROS in some fashion whichbi believe is against our rules here. And to solicit drama and stir the pot here or there if for a bunch of whiteknight assholes who are clearly driving an agenda. Not to protect the subject poster,provider or tits; but this is fucking ridiculous and cannot be confirmed without CG reaching out directly to mods here. Tatts, you driving this agenda makes you look very much like a WK, and while there may be good reasons in your world, why don't you take you own advice and just chill. Nobody here needs drama from TOS and the moo moo mafia

Nobody is sharing ROS. You are just looking for arguments. This was not from a review and is visible to anyone, nor was it from this site.

[eyecu2]

Someone here shared the review with CharleyGirl. That how she knew the details of the review was "not bad" and was rather "good or positive". That is the violation of Eccie rules, and if you are the one who did it, you should own it. She obviously doesn't have access to them here on her own, so just for shits n giggles, and since you are here carrying a torch for CG, we'll assume it's you. Did you send or share the contents of ROS, TO A NONE PREMIUM access account holder? Yes you did, And then to blabber on like a little school girl about how a review can Fuck someone up here in a hooker review board is the icing on the cake; Mr. White-knight, what you've done here is post on the board nothing but non substantiated drivel from another board, shared ROS with those without non prem access, and then come here to flame someone about shit posted almost 2 months ago because you weren't here. Why so long to catch up? Oh yeah, you were banned...for the 5th, 6th, 7th time. Do you dredge up old garbage that has the relevancy of a fart in church from last month so you can be big brother to a hooker! And you do it by breaking the rules here when doing so. Were you laying together side-by -side in a post coitus snuggle session and go through every CG REVIEW?

I think my RTM BUTTON is going to be pushed since your breaking rules here AGAIN, and only on your first week back. Stop whining,lying and manipulating people. Here, that earns you a proverbial kick in the dick and being called out. And Sir, you are being called out as a liar and someone who is sharing ROS ACTIVITY with a non prem access holder.

[eyecu2]

Originally Posted by tatasddd

For those not on TOS:
As written by CG:

"So recently I was notified that there is a new review on TOS. Authored by Pghsean..... I am curious what the policy is over there when guys write fake reviews to get free access to special areas of the site? I haven't hung out with this guy since May 23rd of 2015! Lolololol it's not a bad review...

For those on TOS:
http://www.indys.com/forum/viewtopic...hsean#p2130176

PLEASE DO NOT WRITE FAKE REVIEWS.

I reference and quote your post with additional quotes from CG- "she was notified" ,and "it's not a bad review".

In fact someone shared with her the contents of the review or she wouldn't know if it was bad or not. The only person here carrying the torch for her is you. Ergo- it was you who shared the information. Doesn't' take a genius to figure that out. BUSTED.

[berryberry]

So to recap, Tattas has been exposed as a White Knight and someone who posts fake reviews - to go along with all of his past sordid history

WOW

[Hematoma]

Originally Posted by tatasddd

Where is your evidence? Only you know that.

Evidence? It's in the forum you dumbass. Berry is just stating the obvious. We all know that. You have a very short memory, don't you? Again, my bad...I'm not used to conversing with someone with an IQ in double digits. I'll try to write my post in crayon next time.

[eyecu2]

Someone spotted TatasDDD in Shenley Park

[sexymaid_69]

Ok., just for the record.... I feel I must add this.

TheeCharlieGirl doesn't come over to eccie even though she does have access.
She also has lots of Pittsburgh friends who do.

The fact that someone posted a favorable review of her here is not viewable only to members.
Hell this is eccie,
anyone can see the posts and any uncoded comments.

Someone was bound to tell her about it.
(FTR Not me because she's told me she could care less what ya'll say over here and would rather NOT hear about it)


She wasn't happy about a new review from an OLD session. She wanted to let folks know it wasn't current or actually truthful.

Bottom line is this,
The TRUE Ladies don't want false reviews even if they're positive.

Oh and eyeceu2
you can tell if it's a positive review from the very public, very visible comments made after

Really guys?
Ya'll don't even know this site that well?
geezzz

[tatasddd]

Originally Posted by Hematoma

Evidence? It's in the forum you dumbass. Berry is just stating the obvious. We all know that. You have a very short memory, don't you? Again, my bad...I'm not used to conversing with someone with an IQ in double digits. I'll try to write my post in crayon next time.

Find it & show it and most importantly PROVE it! I can say anything is in the forums.

[eyecu2]

Originally Posted by sexymaid_69

Ok., just for the record.... I feel I must add this.

TheeCharlieGirl doesn't come over to eccie even though she does have access.
She also has lots of Pittsburgh friends who do.

anyone can see the posts and any uncoded comments.

Bottom line is this,
The TRUE Ladies don't want false reviews even if they're positive.

Oh and eyeceu2
you can tell if it's a positive review from the very public, very visible comments made after

Really guys?
Ya'll don't even know this site that well?

All due respect; the after- comments can and do leak out information and details at times. My point is this ROS information is not public. SO - I think I understand what can be summized and what is shared behind doors. I also realize that anyone can see the general information about a review- and if it was a positive experience. But the details are where ROS information here is to be kept un-read and un-available to the general populus, since it's PRIVATE;



Jinny- I think you are a voice of moderation in most cases, and you have friends on both sides of this equation, but I hope you understand why I'm on a soapbox about this. If CharleyGirl wants to ring in on this, and has access to this site, she's welcome to join in on the conversation. Perhaps she should to clear the air on what she heard, how she heard it, and what level of details so that those parties involved are either exhonerated or further known as the perpetrators they are suspected of being.



In the words of Trump. "Someone is a Leaker here". And not just down their trouser leg either.

[tatasddd]

What ROS details are you daydreaming about? There is no ROS here. There is no copying of anything from the fake review. There is just what CG said in open forums on indys and that was that THE REVIEW WRITTEN BY PGHSEAN IS FAKE.

[tatasddd]

And just for the record...We also DO NOT CARE what CG says or does or thinks. So her not coming on here doesn't move me at all. What I was stressing upon was NOT TO write fake reviews in order to gain access to read bullshit as that could endanger someone in an unpleasant way.

[eyecu2]

Originally Posted by tatasddd

We also DO NOT CARE what CG says or does or thinks. So her not coming on here doesn't move me at all.

honestly- I think there is an issue here that has me scratching my head. First you bring up CharleyGirl, then you say that someone is posting fake reviews and name her as the subject, and then you start on your crusade about fake reviews; or as it's become known as "review-gate", and here you are posting old reviews of your escapades in May on here. Old reviews are old reviews. At what point do they become relevant. Or are they simply posted here so you can say you were active in your pursuits.

The fact that you have carried the CG torch over here, and suggest improprieties, and then post your own old reviews is absolutele hypocricy. Now you don't care about CG or what she does or thinks, or her coming over here .......and the reason is you would be even further busted on your BS.



KEEP ON DIGGING DEEPER BRO!

[tatasddd]

CG was mentioned as a confirmation of the review being fake. Old reviews may be old but they are NOT fake. The reason why I posted old reviews was because I was not on this site at the time and not everyone is on TOS. People not on there also want to read them. Nobody cares what CG says or thinks of us. She was mentioned as evidence and nothing else at all. I am not wasting my keyboard any longer to explain pointless shit to you that you don't understand.

[signa]

Originally Posted by tatasddd

CG was mentioned as a confirmation of the review being fake. Old reviews may be old but they are NOT fake. The reason why I posted old reviews was because I was not on this site at the time and not everyone is on TOS. People not on there also want to read them. Nobody cares what CG says or thinks of us. She was mentioned as evidence and nothing else at all. I am not wasting my keyboard any longer to explain pointless shit to you that you don't understand.

why is the library closing soon?

[tatasddd]

Originally Posted by signa

why is the library closing soon?

Whne was the last time you accessed ECCIE from a library? Are you capable enough of doing it? Maybe your local branch is closing.