My permanent reply to gun control

[Randy4Candy]

What the little girl in the video is talking about has nothing to do with assault weapons or high capacity magazines. I don't think many colleges' shooting teams use assault rifles or HCMs in their competition.

But, that really doesn't make all that much difference to how I see the issue. I'm for background checks 100% of the time, yes, even when Bubba sells a hunting rifle to Jethro. It can be handled exactly like when Jethro sells his used truck to Bubba. A title has to be exchanged and the same would be true with a gun. A gun or rifle is someting that ought to be titled like a car. They're dangerous and should require a license to use. Hell, gun shops would jump at the chance to make some $ administering a background check and handling the paperwork just like the DMV does. It ain't that hard. As far as the fee goes, fu*k it, it's just a cost of doing business - big freaking deal.

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by LovingKayla

Yes I want to control my guns. Correct. I'm willing to die to keep them, I pitty the person that's willing to die to take them.
.

WHEN, SFG? WHEN?

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by WTF

She is no Randy Weaver. She'd give up her guns along with her beaver if they told her to. Let's not fall for her Heston impersonation!

She'd (forbidden topic) if the (forbidden topic) was (forbidden topic) enough!

Stupid Fucking Girl!

[Chica Chaser]

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

You have the right, with a CHL, to carry a concealed handgun. Your choice and I support your right to choose.

I don't need a CHL in my state to carry, concealed or not. Its that way in many US states. Nor do I need one to purchase a handgun, rifle or shotgun. With a quick background check and cash, I walk out the door with whatever I choose.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by LovingKayla

I bet you still suck your thumb too.

If you are addressing your remark to me, I can't remember ever sucking my thumb. I have sucked on a clit or two. How about you?

As for the rest of your tantrum, I was asking an easy "yes" or "no" question. I am for "gun control" ... which is like just about everything else in our society ... if you can't control it, then "big brother" will.

The firearms I own are "under control" when with me and when not.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by LovingKayla

... I pitty the person that's willing to die to take them.

I would say the more likely question is whether you are "willing" to die to keep them. The person coming has already made the decision.

[CJOHN]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

If you are addressing your remark to me, I can't remember ever sucking my thumb. I have sucked on a clit or two. How about you?

As for the rest of your tantrum, I was asking an easy "yes" or "no" question. I am for "gun control" ... which is like just about everything else in our society ... if you can't control it, then "big brother" will.

The firearms I own are "under control" when with me and when not.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by Randy4Candy

Hell, gun shops would jump at the chance to make some $ administering a background check and handling the paperwork just like the DMV does. It ain't that hard. As far as the fee goes, fu*k it, it's just a cost of doing business - big freaking deal.

Licensed dealers already have plenty of "paperwork" and they don't have "access" to the criminal background check data bases. Now you want to give them that information?

You are talking about licensing honest, law abiding people. That doesn't solve the issue. There are examples of "licensing" certain products (not mentionable on the board) for the benefit of "law abiding citizens," but they are not the ones who get prosecuted for possessing certain "product" without a "license" to have the product. The Feds even have a "tax" on some of the "products," but still have to prosecute people for SMUGGLING the "products" into the United States to avoid the "licensing" and "tax"!

[JD Barleycorn]

Colorado lawmaker does not understand the difference between bullets and magazines. Thinks that magazines are purchased, fired, and disposed of.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid..._reloaded.html

I'm going to call out the gay Candyman on this. Doing background checks or registering gun owners is nothing lilke registering a car. I Bubba wants to sell his truck to Jethro, he does it and fills out the paperwork for tax purposes. There is no denial or possibility of denial. It is just informing the local government what has already been done.

The standard of gun registration is all about government having the power to DENY one person selling a weapon to another person. Do we register car owners like they want to register gun owners? No!

Don't bring up this stupid strawman argument again. It just demonstrates you inability to think.

[timpage]

Round and round we go.....

[acp5762]

Originally Posted by jbravo_123

Ideally, I'd like to see all guns banned. Yes, I understand it's not going to happen and it's a Constitutional right to bear arms, but clearly at this point, our society is showing we can't handle the responsibility to have ready access to such dangerous stuff.

This is why we can't have nice things!

Think about this realistically for a minute, all guns are banned. One night you are in your living room watching television. You hear some noises in a back room to your home. You go to investigate and two individuals are climbing in through a window. For the sake of arguement lets just say they aren't armed with a firearm but rather a knife. How do you think you would fair in this particular situation? Lets also assume that the right of a homeowner to use deadly force on an intruder into his home still exists, and you have two.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Doing background checks or registering gun owners is nothing lilke registering a car.

The ONLY similarity is that roughly 1/3, if not more, of the vehicles being driven around town are not being operated on a regular basis by the person named on the title. Same with boats at the coast.

A trucker in Texas can go to any county assessors office with a piece of paper (bill of sale) saying he bought the truck (no title necessary or name on the title, and it can even be an out-of-state registered truck) and the clerk will issue "temporary tags" for 60-90 days ... when they expire the trucker can go to another county and repeat .... there are 252 counties in Texas ... you do the math. The truck will wear out first .... if the clerk doesn't retire (there is not state data base to track the paper tags.)

[EXTXOILMAN]

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Your first paragraph shows how stupid you are. Kayla wants no gun control and you agree with her. Then you state that individual companies and property owners should be able to restrict guns on their property. 180 degrees apart.

Second paragraph -- Never mentioned public transportation. Homes, businesses, colleges/schools and airlines should have the right, in my opinion, to decide for themselves whether or not to ban guns. I NEVER said guns should be unilaterally banned from homes or businesses. You have the right to have a gun in your home or in your car. You have the right, with a CHL, to carry a concealed handgun. Your choice and I support your right to choose.

Understand that, shit for brains?

A person or company's right to ban guns on their premises has nothing to do with my right to have one, okay, Shithead?? In my post I stated that I support BOTH, because they're different rights!!

Now, let's review. Your first post (to me) said you wanted to ban all guns. Your second post (to LK) asked four questions regarding the right to ban guns in1) homes, 2) businesses, 3) colleges/universities, and 4) airlines (aka Public Transportation, moron). Who needs the right to ban guns on a premise when/if the right has been taken away?? Now who's 180 degrees apart on their position??

Good god it's exhausting talking to you libtards.

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by acp5762

Think about this realistically for a minute, all guns are banned. One night you are in your living room watching television. You here some noises in a back room to your home. You go to investigate and two individuals are climbing in through a window. For the sake of arguement lets just say they aren't armed with a firearm but rather a knife. How do you think you would fair in this particular situation? Lets also assume that the right of a homeowner to use deadly force on an intruder into his home still exists, and you have two.

never bring a knife to a banned gunfight

[ZedX79]

There are plenty of scholarships available besides shooting young woman.