PSA Regarding Misinformation in Recent Review

[DFW_Ladies_Man]

Most guys don't even pay attention to the description...we are visual creatures and go straight to the pictures, activities, then rate. If I look at your physical description its because of a discrepancy within the review. For instance if the reviewer states " much larger than pics" or "heavily photshopped...".

No worries Caitie...based on your reviews and photos I'd book you and could care less about your physical stats. 😉

[Gluteman]

Well said Caitie. Your response is intelligent and considerate. ....... And I am so very happy to learn that you did NOT get a goddamn boob job.

[Chung Tran]

I expected to see a rebuttal of a scathing comment.. this seems like a minor matter, but if you feel it is not, power to you.. IIRC, the average American woman in 2015 sports a 36c, so "huge knockers" is an overreach.. but I can see how a guy would consider that large, especially on an otherwise smaller lady.

for me, I don't care much about size, as long as they are real.. large, small, saggy, inverted nipples, quarter-sized areolas, lactating.. just make sure they go in my mouth..

[grean]

Well its kind of like when one sees a small to medium sized snake. Some people's minds go hay wire and replaces the word "small" with "huge and long" just because they saw a snake. It's a very common mistake, and no biggy. ( no, biggy. Get it? Lol)

If you saw a worm, though, and then told everybody you saw a big snake, that's missleading. In other words if a girl has A's and a guy said she was sporting D's, that'd be an issue.

[Guest092216]

I have this crazy notion that Catie Mae literally 'pisses excellence'. Awesome topic.

[nicholas linnear]

I love soft and milfy! C was probably my GPA in school, when I could be pulled away from my beloved bong.

[oldbutstillgoing]

I would say you are way over thinking this. I have seen breasts I would swear are several cup sizes bigger than they are. Its a subjective description. Hopefully any guy interested in seeing you would check your show case first.

[TinMan]

It's probably not just the cup miscalculation that concerned her, it's the hardbody image his description implies that she wanted to set straight, or at least that's how I read it.

Bravo to CM for recognizing honesty is the best policy. Now, where is that martini shaker...

[Lifeking]

I think we can clear things up with a nice picture of your tits. :-)

[DarkeyKong]

Originally Posted by Lifeking

I think we can clear things up with a nice picture of your tits. :-)

Great idea!!! Let's settle this once and for all and obtain the truth and clarity we so sorely need. Because "that's" what we care about here!

[doug_dfw]

Congratulations. One hell of a Hollywood promotion stunt. Hope business picks up. Mods should assess an advertising fee.

[Boltfan]

Originally Posted by doug_dfw

Congratulations. One hell of a Hollywood promotion stunt. Hope business picks up. Mods should assess an advertising fee.

Did SCOTUS pee in your cheerios? Good god man, bitter much?

[oldbutstillgoing]

Originally Posted by TinMan

It's probably not just the cup miscalculation that concerned her, it's the hardbody image his description implies that she wanted to set straight, or at least that's how I read it.

Bravo to CM for recognizing honesty is the best policy. Now, where is that martini shaker...

And right back to what I said. Its subjective. Given how many guys on here don't know the difference between curvy, BBW, and fat, is anyone at all surprised some describe things different from others?

CM is a fantastic looking woman. But if someone relies entirely upon one description instead of doing proper research, I just don't have a lot of sympathy for them

[Caitie Mae]

I didn't expect such a turnout of respondents. I am certainly relieved that so many of you understand why I felt the need to make this statement. I could have sought out a consultation from Bojulay and Tin Man before posting. I appreciate them both for cutting to the core of my issue so deftly.

I agree with those of you who say that 36C can seem huge on certain body sizes and shapes. I also agree that without measured/measurable statistics any description is relative to the author's experience. My current proportions are pleasantly configured and lovely to discover, but I would expect no one who has seen me naked to describe my breasts as "huge" based upon the total package.

This isn't my first rodeo and I know that no one has ever come to see me because of the size of my tits or my ass or my waist. No one has ever booked with me because I'm a natural brunette or because my hair may be colored any shade of the rainbow on any given day. No one reaches out to me because I'm 5'8" or because I have cute "cum catching dimples" (Nice visual, gluteman. Thanks for that.) I don't believe the fact I have a few tattoos has drawn any special interest. While I know that none of these features are drawing interest, I am well aware of the fact that some of these features may be a deal breaker for certain men among you.

Despite the fact that it's not my responsibility to monitor reviews of time spent with me or to make sure everyone who sees me has done his homework, I have pointed out to a couple of potential clients in the past that I may not be what he's looking for in a provider based on the "type" of girls he has named as references or has previously reviewed. I know that when I tell you that I may not be your type I risk missing out on future money, but if I don't bring it up, you're at risk of losing a considerable amount of money you're already earned.

Ultimately, it's my responsibility to ensure the best experience possible once a hobbyist crosses my threshold. Whether it's the first of many, many future visits or the one and only session with a conquistador, I know that a disappointing first impression can make that achievement close to impossible.

I have to admit that I expected to read a lot more complaints about this topic being a threAD and I am surprised that only doug_dfw made the direct accusaion. (While I am certain that he's not at all concerned with my booking volume, I don't mind saying that I am putting off many of my current inquiries due to the fact that my incall will be unavailable for the better part of the week. I also don't mind saying that because the incall isn't available I haven't placed either of my two alloted local ads this week.)

Thanks again to everyone who commented for chiming in. I appreciate all of the opinions shared, including the personal compliments.... I can't even tell you how hard I laughed over the "pissing. excellence" comment from thathottnurse. And for Lifeking and darkeykong, new photos are forthcoming, but it's unlike I'll start exposing the assets in question after all these years.

[Fawlty]

Originally Posted by TexTushHog

Exactly. Avoiding an inadvertent misrepresentation or misunderstanding. A very literate post by Catie Mar, too, I might add. Brains are important and sexy.

Amen to that. Catie, you obviously retained what you learned from English classes - I 'm guessing at the university level. Kudos.