YummyMarie: a place for her random ideas, thoughts, and musings

[universalenergy]

Grilled chicken salad for lunch and banana pudding.

[Guest032117]

Banana pudding?! Fuck me sideways...my favorite dessert ever!!!!!

[Guest032117]

Does anyone else get immense pleasure from cracking crab legs?

[Guest032117]

[WTF]

Originally Posted by universalenergy

Herfacechair your replies are way too long, therefore I think many are not reading what you are posting. How can you call that a win?

herfacechair thinks anything is a win as long as it lives up to his username!

If he knew my objective...he'd know how much i love his posts, taint that right Yummy!

[Guest032117]

[WTF]

Originally Posted by YummyMarie

Pigeon taste like Chicken

[herfacechair]

Originally Posted by chicagoboy

Are the adminitards certain herfacechair isn't one of Ol' Ho's mandles?

Wrong, I'm not anybody's sock puppet. This is my original account/profile with ECCIE. I never had a profile on the website that came before ECCIE. I don't know who Ol' Ho's is, but if the administrators say that I'm not him/her, then you have to accept that. I know for fact and I'm not whoever that person is.

In fact, do a Google search of my username to find out where else I posted. I've used "herfacechair" as a username while posting on hobby and BDSM forums for over a decade.

There is a smarter way to determine if one of the current profiles is a sock puppet for somebody else. Two things really. One way is the overall writing pattern, another way is via the psychological profile. If you show me a link to this person's posts, I'll show you how wrong your assumption is.

Also, by the way you rearrange the word for administrator, I'm sensing an attempt to silence me. It's like kids running to a parent, or a teacher, in attempt to shut down a fellow sibling/classmate.

People reading this thread, who do not want to see my posts, or anybody else's posts for that matter, are free to scroll down without even reading those posts. Nobody is pointing a gun to a thread-surfers' heads requiring them to read my posts. There are actions that people could do, at their level, without attempting to get a moderator to shut down someone's freedom of speech, simply because they don't like what that person says or does.

Included, in these actions, is simply ignoring the "offending" poster. You can also completely skip my posts by using the "Control F" function to skip to another username that posted.

[herfacechair]

Originally Posted by universalenergy

Herfacechair your replies are way too long, therefore I think many are not reading what you are posting. How can you call that a win?

If you bothered paying attention to what you read, with the intention of understanding what you are reading, you would never come to the conclusion that I see the length of my posts as a "win." I've repeatedly argued about my advancing facts, reason, and logic. THAT's what you call a win, especially when the opposition offers no argument in return, other than strawman arguments, and other inductive fallacies.

You win by countering an erroneous, assumption based argument, with facts, reason, and logic. I've done that. Anything after that is done for sadistic pleasure.

Second, if you think that my replies are way too long, you're not qualified to respond to anything I said. Regardless of the length of my posts, I'm holding the opposition accountable for reading everything I say with the intention of understanding what I'm saying. That's a prerequisite if they expect to provide an intelligent reply.

Third, you're preaching to the choir with regards to who is reading my post and who isn't. I've debated online for over a decade, you're not the first one that has told me that my posts were too long that an X number of people were not reading.

However, I received support every time I hammer people with these kinds of posts. Either the people that oppose me, or people with small minds, refuse to read my posts. That's a given. The fact of the matter is that there are others that are reading my posts, regardless of how long they are.

It boils down to which side you're on. I've yet to have someone, on my side of the argument, complain to me about my post lengths. In fact, there have been numerous occasions when I've had the same person describe my posts in two different ways depending on whether we were on the same or opposing sides.

[herfacechair]

Originally Posted by WTF

herfacechair thinks anything is a win as long as it lives up to his username!

If he knew my objective...he'd know how much i love his posts, taint that right Yummy!

Wrong on both counts.

I consider it a win if the opposition, like you, fails to advance a valid argument, and resorts immediately to inductive fallacies as their main argument.

As for your objectives, again you're full of it. I've lost count of how me times I've argued against someone, who wanted me to just "give up", who claimed that they're doing it for fun, and that they were enjoying my posts. Nothing could be further from the truth.

The only person in our exchange, that's enjoying this, is me. After I log off, I tend to chuckle, even break out laughing, thinking about how you're going to react to what I say. In most instances, you reacted exactly the way I expected. Again, it's like making a puppy chase its own tail around.

Again, I take sadistic pleasure in taking your arguments apart, then watching your reactions.

[WTF]

I love musing in this thread...so informative and fun!

[Guest032117]

[chicagoboy]

Would it be a Guideline #16 violation to suggest that herfacechair ought to take something for that nasty case of logorrhea?

[Unique_Carpenter]

Originally Posted by WTF

I love musing in this thread...so informative and fun!

Congrates WTF, you've advanced another level.

And yes Marie, absolutely.

There's only one thing missing:

[universalenergy]

HFC...I could say everything you say in one or two sentences.
KISS.
Yummy I like somebody else to crack and pull out the meat and dip it in the sauce.
I only want to eat it.