Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Sandbox - National
test
The Sandbox - National The Sandbox is a collection of off-topic discussions. Humorous threads, Sports talk, and a wide variety of other topics can be found here.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 649
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 397
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 280
George Spelvin 267
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70798
biomed163382
Yssup Rider61074
gman4453297
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48697
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42867
The_Waco_Kid37225
CryptKicker37224
Mokoa36496
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-21-2012, 07:45 PM   #166
Doove
Valued Poster
 
Doove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 19, 2009
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 7,271
Encounters: 7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB View Post
You still lied. Fucker. He did not go to Normandy and you are A FUCKING LIAR...
The conversation was not about whether or not he went in 2012.

You're embarrassing yourself. Again.
Doove is offline   Quote
Old 06-21-2012, 07:47 PM   #167
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

Ah, CBJ7, you don't understand freedom. It's too bad, but you will feel comfortable when the police state takes full force. No need to think for yourself, the government will do it for. They will tell you what you need to know, and what you don't. At least you'll be happy that way.
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 06-21-2012, 07:53 PM   #168
CJ7
Valued Poster
 
CJ7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy View Post
Ah, CBJ7, you don't understand freedom. It's too bad, but you will feel comfortable when the police state takes full force. No need to think for yourself, the government will do it for. They will tell you what you need to know, and what you don't. At least you'll be happy that way.


CJ7 is offline   Quote
Old 06-21-2012, 07:53 PM   #169
Doove
Valued Poster
 
Doove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 19, 2009
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 7,271
Encounters: 7
Default

Just another perpetuality that only became a problem on 1/20/09.
Doove is offline   Quote
Old 06-21-2012, 07:55 PM   #170
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

It's been a problem a lot longer than that, Doofie. Obama is just the current threat. He's not the first.

CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 06-21-2012, 07:57 PM   #171
Doove
Valued Poster
 
Doove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 19, 2009
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 7,271
Encounters: 7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy View Post
It's been a problem a lot longer than that, Doofie. Obama is just the current threat. He's not the first.

You're right. I think George Washington was probably the first.
Doove is offline   Quote
Old 06-21-2012, 08:02 PM   #172
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

Nah, not Washington. But there are arguments that the problem began shortly after his administration. I posted the progression of tyranny on another thread. It began a long time ago, but has escalated to breakneck speed under Bush 43 and now Obama.

I never thought I'd say I missed Bill Clinton. I do.
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 06-21-2012, 08:06 PM   #173
IIFFOFRDB
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jun 19, 2011
Location: Dixie Land
Posts: 22,098
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doove View Post
The conversation was not about whether or not he went in 2012.

You're embarrassing yourself. Again.
You lieing little prattle mouthed BITCH.
IIFFOFRDB is offline   Quote
Old 06-21-2012, 08:18 PM   #174
Doove
Valued Poster
 
Doove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 19, 2009
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 7,271
Encounters: 7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy View Post
I never thought I'd say I missed Bill Clinton. I do.
You don't miss Bill Clinton. You miss the era in which Bill Clinton was President.

The reason you think corruption is escalated like it has is because you now have 20 million webmasters all reading each other, feeding into each other, and trying to propagandize every little atomic sized piece of information into a major scandal of some sort. And with people like you who get off spending 14 hrs a day perpetuating it all in your rambling postings on internet forums, forums that didn't exist 15 or even 10 years ago, of course people are going to think it's worse than it's ever been. Only problem is, it's not. It's only worse than they've ever known it to be. Big difference.
Doove is offline   Quote
Old 06-21-2012, 08:20 PM   #175
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doove View Post
Expedite the enforcement? What the heck does that even mean? Make the law scheduled to take effect on 1/1/13, take effect on 1/1/12? Make it so they can ignore the part of the law whereby asylum seekers need to apply for asylum?

What are you talking about.
Doofus, invest in a dictionary.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CJ7 View Post


and you had plenty time to read the bill .. the debate lasted over a year, the bill cleared the senate in December and wasnt signed until March ... you are the one obligated to make an effort to go to Washington and read it ... unless of course you think you have the right to have HR's delivered to your front door.
COG is right, CBJ7, the public wasn't given enough time to read it. Even Pelosi said: "We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it."

Notice, there's no connotation that your number one bitch said: "You had time to read the bill; so we can pass it.
" Quite the opposite.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 06-21-2012, 08:24 PM   #176
Doove
Valued Poster
 
Doove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 19, 2009
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 7,271
Encounters: 7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
Doofus, invest in a dictionary.
For someone who's always quick to (think he's) set me straight by posting pages and pages out of everything from The Constitution to Wickipedia, i'll take this as your admission that you don't know what you mean either.
Doove is offline   Quote
Old 06-21-2012, 08:27 PM   #177
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doove View Post
For someone who's always quick to (think he's) set me straight by posting pages and pages out of everything from The Constitution to Wickipedia, i'll take this as your admission that you don't know what you mean either.

Then you would be -- as usual -- very wrong, Doofus. Buy a dictionary, you prick.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 06-21-2012, 08:33 PM   #178
Doove
Valued Poster
 
Doove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 19, 2009
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 7,271
Encounters: 7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
Then you would be -- as usual -- very wrong, Doofus. Buy a dictionary, you prick.
No need to.

ex·pe·dite   [ek-spi-dahyt] Show IPA verb, ex·pe·dit·ed, ex·pe·dit·ing, adjective
verb (used with object)
1.to speed up the progress of; hasten: to expedite shipments.
2.to accomplish promptly, as a piece of business; dispatch: to expedite one's duties.
3.to issue or dispatch, as an official document or letter.
adjective
4.Obsolete . ready for action; alert.


So again, tell me what it means to "expedite" a law, without changing it in any way, a law that's supposedly been on the books for years by using an Executive Order.
Doove is offline   Quote
Old 06-21-2012, 08:39 PM   #179
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doove View Post
No need to.

ex·pe·dite   [ek-spi-dahyt] Show IPA verb, ex·pe·dit·ed, ex·pe·dit·ing, adjective
verb (used with object)
1.to speed up the progress of; hasten: to expedite shipments.
2.to accomplish promptly, as a piece of business; dispatch: to expedite one's duties.
3.to issue or dispatch, as an official document or letter.
adjective
4.Obsolete . ready for action; alert.


So again, tell me what it means to "expedite" a law, without changing it in any way, a law that's supposedly been on the books for years by using an Executive Order.
Jackass!
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 06-21-2012, 08:43 PM   #180
Doove
Valued Poster
 
Doove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 19, 2009
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 7,271
Encounters: 7
Default

But how did Bush's order accomplish that? If the laws were already on the books, if they didn't need to be amended or changed, then all we needed to do was follow them as already written.

Where was the need to issue an Executive Order?
Doove is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved