Quote:
Originally Posted by K lovve
I literally just fell out of my chair into a heap of giggles. I am curious, which James Bond movie are these outlandish accusations stemming from? This entire issue has been blown SO far out of proportion; at this point, I am even more compelled to set the record strait.
|
I'm pretty sure you read the thread started by Still Looking, since this is the resulting spew from Marco.
Quote:
*Rockerrick: darling, while Whispers certainly has the gift of gab, he is in NO position to be answering questions regarding the security or operation of the RBB site. Or the M!NT fiascofor that matter. He has self-imposed himself into the position of answering questions based SOLEY on hearsay. Remember my remark about playing Telephone? To correctly answer your questions...
*The "information gathering" should not be labeled as such. Providers are simply allowed to enter feedback on clients if they so wish, as an Information Exchange between the ladies. YOU have the option to log in and make said feedback public, or private.
|
So if I am mentioned by a BP hooker who thinks she's going to get back at me because I left her standing at the door for putting up misleading pictures, RBB will host my handle, contact info, and description until I decide to log onto RBB to make it public or private?
How are the providers on that list screened? I'm confused as to who can provide client "feedback" on the site, Marco has mentioned that anonymous feedback is/will be possible on RBB. Does that mean anyone can post client information or only verified providers?
Quote:
|
*the "Domain Incall" is NOT affiliated with M!NT. It is available to a few ladies that remain low volume and can respect the space.
|
Is it affiliated with Paprika or Marco?
Quote:
|
*nobody is being watched. Where did that even come from? And photographed!? Absolutely not. Why on earth would ANYONE want photographs of hobbyists? The implication of such is a two-edged sword; if that were true, everyone involved (photographer and subject) would be left in a vulnerable position.
|
Absurd or not, I'm not sure how you can be "absolutely" sure that nobody is being watched or photographed when you are not associated with M!NT. M!NT has been known to use that incall, even if you say it is not owned by that agency, I'm not sure how you can be sure what M!NT does when they use the place.
Quote:
Whew! One more thing, on the security issue...does anyone remember "the site that must not be named" and the security breach we had here? While I may not know much about anything techy, I would venture to guess that NOTHING on the Internet is sacred. So to single out RBB with regards to that issue is a little naive.
What else can I address? I am not standing down, folks 
|
Exactly, even sites with fairly acceptable security can be compromised, what can we expect of RBB with their sub par security?
Remember that the security issue isn't solely about technical implementation. It is the nature of the information stored and history of unethical behavior of those involved.
