Quote:
Originally Posted by CryptKicker
As long as the Hillary theme is tied into Gaetz as LL's last post was this is a proper part of this discussion. pxmcc please stop lecturing members on what they post or move on. If it's off subject we will handle it. So far everything has been loosely within the target.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pxmcc
sure Crypt. you're still pissed at me from 17 threads ago. let it go bro. let the other mods weigh in. they know the bizarre cyberstalking history of LL only too well.
LL knows the score. i'm not going to readdress this issue in this thread.
|
Crypt, i'm sorry if i hurt your feelings on that thread 17 or thereabouts threads back. what you need to know about me is that if you come at me with an opinion-as opposed to a fact-and i happen to disagree with your opinion, i will come back with a counter argument, guaranteed.
it wasn't personally directed at you, it's just what i do. and because i get paid to argue-sometimes lol-it's not even a level playing field to begin with. so there's that mitigating factor to boot working in your favor..
peeps like Boardman know that already, so they try to anticipate-and head off at the pass-rebuttals that they know will be coming, special delivery. Boardman can be kind of tricky too for us AOC worshippers. (he's the only one on this board whose entire life story i haven't figured out. it looks like an ALLEGED particle in a black box.) she really needs to conduct some in-services imo. plus she's hot af, and i would probably be staring at her ASSets while she's trying to give me some darn righteous and proper training..
#AOCimhereifyougettiredofyours orryboyfriend..
#commielivesmatter..
while i am respectful of others and do not stoop to ad hominem arguments; i.e., personal attacks, i can admittedly sometimes come across as "tricky," "confusing,"and "unpredictable." that is not my intent at all, i can assure you. i would much rather come across as simple, straight forward, and entirely predictable..
i don't know if you've ever read St. Thomas Aquinas-probably not if you have any sanity at all and you are not in a cult like Opus Dei-but he always presents 3 objections to his main conclusion before he gets to his chief point, and, unfortunately, it turns out, i am always convinced by his 3 objections before i find out what a silly fool i was for getting bamboozled by those 3 sophistic word salad indulgences. well, i seem to have forgotten what my point was, but hopefully you can figure it out nonetheless, if there actually was a point, to what Slit most perspicaciously calls "drivel." he is exactly correct btw..
if you are not feeling argumentative at a particular moment in time, i might recommend taking a pass until you get your argu-mojo back, or sticking to facts, which if actually factual as opposed to "alternatively factual," or "factual-ish," will earn no rebuttal from me, so long as i am sober. if i'm not sober, well pretty much all bets are off. my apologies ahead of time, and i shoulda asked trump for a pardon for "future bad acts," which i know i will need..
again, i'm sorry if i hurt your feelings. i think you thought maybe i was a normal hobbyist, before you found out-too late it would turn out-that i'm actually a Communist, and a sneaky Commie at that..
any thoughts on the Gaetz case? i know you posted in this thread with your mod hat on, so of course i won't get on your case for posting in a thread of no interest to you. plus, at the mere snap of your fingers, being the super-mod that you most definitely are, you could easily sentence me to 7 lifetime bans, with 0 credit for time served (on "more than 1" occasion). so there's that.
henceforth, and in conclusion, pretty please with extra sugar and cream and strawberries on top, don't give me 7 or more lifetime bans. after i reincarnate through 5 or so life cycles, in the interest of justice, i should be totally be able to post again. hopefully..
