Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

CuteOldGuy · 02-01-2013, 06:11 PM

WPF was losing the argument, as usual, and tried to deflect, again, unsuccessfully.

WTF · 02-01-2013, 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

WPF was losing the argument, as usual, and tried to deflect, again, unsuccessfully.

These are just opinions...one does not lose or win opinions. You have yours, I have mine. Period.

Yssup Rider · 02-01-2013, 08:55 PM

all things considered, Whirlyturd writes like a third grader.

No wonder he was truly elected

Unaliar of the Year!

Smily face. Smily face. Smily face.

CuteOldGuy · 02-01-2013, 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WTF

I have mine. Period.

Then why were deflecting, and not addressing the issue?

Oh, and I'm sorry you're on your period. If you want to wait a couple days before answering, it's OK.

JD Barleycorn · 02-02-2013, 01:51 AM

WTF (am I doing), I take that you support Menedez in ALL of his endeavors?

Chica Chaser · 02-02-2013, 02:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WTF

OH IT WAS ME AND ONLY ME POSTING IN THAT THREAD...lol tff. I took up for Paterno, he did not fuc anybody and he was 85 years old and I advocated letting the legal system play out. I dont give a shit if you want to let folks talk about this shit. he ain't my senator!

No, you and your GF were having one of your usual spats there. But you are the one quoting the rules in this thread. I'm merely explaining the history.

CuteOldGuy · 02-02-2013, 02:16 AM

CC, back already? Welcome home!

WTF · 02-02-2013, 04:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Then why were deflecting, and not addressing the issue?

Oh, and I'm sorry you're on your period. If you want to wait a couple days before answering, it's OK.

Don't you have some Chem stream to rail about?

Quote:

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

WTF (am I doing), I take that you support Menedez in ALL of his endeavors?

I mainly support him (Menedez) fucking you in the ass and letting COG lick your shit off his dick.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chica Chaser

No, you and your GF were having one of your usual spats there. But you are the one quoting the rules in this thread. I'm merely explaining the history.

Then why not take the rule about not talking about children out. It does not sound like it applies anymore in here?

If I remember correctly, I tried at some point early on to point that rule out in that thread too. God knows I regret ever getting into any discussion with you know who.

JD Barleycorn · 02-02-2013, 04:41 AM

Now that we understand some of WTF's proclivities we can get back to politics. Has anyone else seen the first episode of Amerikans or do they spell it Americans now?

LexusLover · 02-02-2013, 04:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WTF

why do you tea nuts think sex is such a bad thing? the problem I have was he did not pay the airfare till it was brought up

Why is it that anyone who disagrees with your opinion is a "tea nut"?

.. or a "tea puke" ... or .... ____________ (fill in the blank)?

Or .... any kind of a "nut" ... or "puke" if

"These are just opinions...one does not lose or win opinions. You have yours, I have mine. Period."

Name calling is not an argument, IMO,

.... it is often a recognition of an inability to make a relevant, logical response. When people are unable to refute what is spoken they often resort to attacking the speaker...in a personal manner.

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=659114

WTF · 02-02-2013, 04:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Why is it that anyone who disagrees with your opinion is a "tea nut"?

Or .... any kind of a "nut" ... if

IDK....maybe because most that post that disagree with me are self proclaimed Tea Nuts.

Why is it that who disagree's with me calls me a liberal commie supporter? It is how the game is played in this forum.

LexusLover · 02-02-2013, 05:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WTF

It is how the game is played in this forum.

You are "playing the game" are trying to be a referee?

WTF · 02-02-2013, 05:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LexusLover

You are "playing the game" are trying to be a referee?

That is part of the game!

LexusLover · 02-02-2013, 05:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WTF

That is part of the game!

Not "the game" .... YOUR game, perhaps. But one day you'll figure out, may be, that referees playing the game usually make poor players and players trying to referee usually make poor referees.

And you seem to be proving that theory.

Guest040616 · 02-02-2013, 07:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Not "the game" .... YOUR game, perhaps. But one day you'll figure out, may be, that referees playing the game usually make poor players and players trying to referee usually make poor referees.

And you seem to be proving that theory.

LL, perhaps you would have more luck directing your observations toward the Mods, as opposed to one side and not the other. It would seem to me that the Mods would have the authority to stop the name calling, not WTF.

Then again, perhaps you are naive enough to believe "they" would stop the name calling if only WTF would make the initial "good faith" leap. Good luck with that!

I suspect the "Trending" lines would be heavily against your one side and not the other approach. But you don't know if you don't try. Right?

Please understand, I am not trying "to rain on your parade." I am just delivering a heavy dose of "Sandbox" reality.

In any event, I truly wish you the best of luck with the effort. Be sure to let me know how it goes!

While on the subject, should your proposed name calling ban also extend to those individuals who regularly refer to the President as "Obamanable"? Or is that not considered name calling?

Is name calling by any other name, still name calling?

Just sayin'