HCSO

[Russ38]

7. The rules of the cjs differ depending on whether your a "have" or "have not".....unless your a high ranking exec working for Halliburton....then you pretty much have a "license to kill"....lol

[Russ38]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

They looked at him early on ... claimed to do a residue test on him .. based on his motivation. He was apparently arrested on a charge of "terroristic threats" with a $ 1 million bond .... according to the news media.

Your intimate knowledge of the decision making ... is lacking to say the least ....

.....it's "widely known" among those who don't know what they are talking about, but like to sound "trendy" ... and undoubtedly "makes points" on a hooker board with lots of folks whining about LE ruining their fun.

The worst thing that can be done in the current situation with Kaufman County is for a focused investigation to concentrate on a "sitting duck" who had a "motive" while the real shooter or shooters are still on the street. First, it doesnt' explain the threats made against other DA's including here in Houston. Secondly, it gives others a "reason" to relax their security and precautions. Third, it provides the real killers (if they are wrong) an opportunity to "disappear" and later on use the erroneous accusations as a defense.

"I doubt many people here would have a problem with LE going after human traffickers or those who exploit minors...but they wanna lump everyone in the same category regardless if they hobby "responsibly" or not.....why?....it always comes down to revenue." Russ88.

When it has to do with the "hobby" ... its "lumping" ... that's what you do.

My preference is for LE to do their job, dot the i's and t's, and make sure they have THE person who did the crime .... and not the media or rumor mongers.

Originally Posted by LexusLover

I wouldn't do a victory lap just quite yet.

Can I do one now?
http://www.khou.com/news/texas-news/202929461.html
Will he be considered a "have or "have not" ?

[Guest050715-1]

Originally Posted by BatteriesNotIncluded

No, you still messed up the spelling lol. But that's ok, I'm not a fighter so I will concede ground to you.

I don't know why I never learned to spell. My grammar is dead on, but my spelling...................... ..ya.......................... ...sucks out loud pretty much.

[Guest050715-1]

Originally Posted by boardman

Um, actually no but that is what it has morphed into and rather interesting at that. Mojojojojo actually might have done something right by moving it.(this is not at all an endorsement of mojojojo's moding skills)

I was being a smartie-pants. LL's said at least twice to stay on topic and that the topic is the killing of some DA's and ADA's.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by Russ38

Can I do one now?
http://www.khou.com/news/texas-news/202929461.html
Will he be considered a "have or "have not" ?

That's your call. But I reserve the privilege of reminding you about it later.

Personally, I'll await the admissible science that is admitted....not news rumors.

I'll let you decide on "have" or "have not" based on the ultimate outcome. Isn't that how you "play it" ... outcome determinative.

If a jury walks him....of the murders, what say you? He's a "have"?

Back to the thread topic ... again!

The independents not on BP ought to love it! I'm trying so hard to help them.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by Russ38

7. The rules of the cjs differ depending on whether your a "have" or "have not".....unless your a high ranking exec working for Halliburton....then you pretty much have a "license to kill"....lol

Same rules. The rank and file hobbyists' choices differ. The "have not" hobbyists will focus on the lower end of the fee spectrum for companionship, which is often found in a fixed location among complaining, nosey neighbors. The "have" hobbyists will seek higher end companionship, who hunker down in more secluded, less conspicuous digs. So the rules are the same; the choices make the difference.

It's all about choice.

Does one save $50 and risk spending $1,000 plus losing a job and family ... or
does one spend the extra 50 bucks and have less risk of job and family losses?

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by OliviaHoward

I was being a smartie-pants. LL's said at least twice to stay on topic and that the topic is the killing of some DA's and ADA's.

Originally Posted by Russ

Can I do one now?
http://www.khou.com/news/texas-news/202929461.html
Will he be considered a "have or "have not" ?

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Same rules. The rank and file hobbyists' choices differ. The "have not" hobbyists will focus on the lower end of the fee spectrum for companionship, which is often found in a fixed location among complaining, nosey neighbors. The "have" hobbyists will seek higher end companionship, who hunker down in more secluded, less conspicuous digs. So the rules are the same; the choices make the difference.

It's all about choice.

Does one save $50 and risk spending $1,000 plus losing a job and family ... or
does one spend the extra 50 bucks and have less risk of job and family losses?

See if you can stay focused. Both of you.

[Russ38]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Does one save $50 and risk spending $1,000 plus losing a job and family ... or
does one spend the extra 50 bucks and have less risk of job and family losses?

No argument here on that point...I'd def spend the extra 50 to reduce the risks....not everyone who works in the oil business is a high level Halliburton exec with "presumed" ties to Cheney...although if that were the case....not a bad buddy to have if your ever in a pinch....just don't go hunting with him. Lol

However, regardless of the outcome...the bad PR exposure had to have sucked.....I would say I felt sorry for him but the fact he was using CL, he was pretty much asking for it.....he definitely should of spent the extra 50.

[Guest050715-1]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

See if you can stay focused. Both of you.

LOL. That's rich right there. So we're back to you have nothing to say so you revert to trying to be personally insulting? Ok.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by OliviaHoward

LOL. That's rich right there. So we're back to you have nothing to say so you revert to trying to be personally insulting? Ok.

OH .. you're incidental. Don't you comprehend that?

But you do keep your name out there.

[Guest050715-1]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

OH .. you're incidental. Don't you comprehend that? .

If I were incidental to you, or anyone for that matter, you'd have shut up by now.

Good luck with your rage. I, along with many others here I'm sure, find you common.

[boardman]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

OH .. you're incidental. Don't you comprehend that?

But you do keep your name out there.

Heh!

[JohnnyYanks]

Originally Posted by OliviaHoward

If I were incidental to you, or anyone for that matter, you'd have shut up by now.

Good luck with your rage. I, along with many others here I'm sure, find you common.

I dig chicks that fight well with words.

[TransAm]

I came late to this particular party, but I think quite a few of you need to take a vacation. Not a points vacation, a real one.

Russ, I'm a fan of most of your stuff, but a lot of your comments on this thread really pissed me off. I'm truly sorry your experiences with our criminal justice system haven't been to your satisfaction. I'm sure you've got your reasons, they might even be valid. But in my very personal experience, most of the people working in it are pretty damn decent, open to a reasonable argument, and fine with being lenient on stupid shit if their bosses aren't completely micro-managing them. There are and will always be exceptions, and it's the nature of the beast that the exceptions garner much more attention and publicity than those doing it the right way. It's kind of like hobbying that way.

I've been an ADA and a defense attorney, and the idea that you're ok with public servants AND their family members being murdered in horrific fashion... Dude, I don't even know what to say about that. "Reap what you sow"? I assume you're a Kauffman County resident and can tell me specifically what the DA's wife did to sow this particular ending? Or is that just collateral damage that you're okay with?

[Guest050715-1]

Originally Posted by boardman

Heh!

Muah .

Originally Posted by JohnnyYanks

I dig chicks that fight well with words.

LOL, I do what I can .