As promised: Slavery good or bad?

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Old-T

Why let's see what we have here: Two more IB lies. How novel of him.

Why yes, I did post at #97, but that was far from the beginning of the thread, no? In fact, I posted at #8. No insults, just a statement about the topic. By the time we get to #97 as you point out--YOU had already hijacked the thread into the cesspool. YOU, not me. Or now do you think #97 comes before #8? Do you know how many disgusting IB rants you injected into this thread PRIOR to the decidedly polite comment I made on #97? (Polite compared to your vomit).

So: IB lies, IB can't count, and IB wants to own slaves. Good work IB.

As to the Nazi's: so now you are defending them too. Might as well. Once you have caused sane people to lose all respect for you, what does it matter if you are pro-Nazi and pro-slavery. Just quit lying if you can (I know you likely can't). My comment was not about "whose name" the Nazi's committed atrocities. I said Christians have killed many other Christians and have justified "their" interpretation of the bible to do so. You can now either address what I did say, or shut up and admit you are a pathetic loser. Of course the third option you have is to continue being the IB we know and ridicule. Personally, I would bet you select that option.

So IB, are you going to post in the "God Given" thread or do you admit your intellectual and moral bankruptcy?

You DO love hearing yourself rant, don't you? So do we--it's the equivalent of feeding time at the zoo, and you are the baboon. The slightly retarded one.

The pathetic, little trollish staker, Old-THUMPER, just admitted that he is a liar. Old-THUMPER said he had cast no insult, but now Old-THUMPER squirms like the worm he is as he fumbling tries to rationalize why, in fact, he did cast an insult. Plus, Old-THUMPER lying misattributes the original hijacker who is, in fact, at post #6.

[Old-T]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

The pathetic, little trollish staker, Old-THUMPER, just admitted that he is a liar. Old-THUMPER said he had cast no insult, but now Old-THUMPER squirms like the worm he is as he fumbling tries to rationalize why, in fact, he did cast an insult. Plus, Old-THUMPER lying misattributes the original hijacker who is, in fact, at post #6.

:r oll1::rol l1:

Learn to read you pathetic piece of shit. YOU said I started the insults at #97 When you are caught in your lie, now you come back and say "No, that's not what I meant! Let me try a different lie and see if I can get away with it!" Don't drag me into your spitball fight with someone else. You lied about me, I caught you in the lie, That's as far as I care. You lied. I posted at #8 and tried to stay on topic. You didn't. Squirm all you want. #8 is what it is and is all the proof I need. Liar.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Old-T

:r oll1::rol l1:

Learn to read you pathetic piece of shit. YOU said I started the insults at #97 When you are caught in your lie, now you come back and say "No, that's not what I meant! Let me try a different lie and see if I can get away with it!" Don't drag me into your spitball fight with someone else. You lied about me, I caught you in the lie, That's as far as I care. You lied. I posted at #8 and tried to stay on topic. You didn't. Squirm all you want. #8 is what it is and is all the proof I need. Liar.

Your first trollish address in this exchange was an insult documenting you to be the pathetic little stalker you are, Old-THUMPER. You lyingly claimed that you never made an insult, Old-THUMPER, and then you lyingly misattributed who it was that hijacked this thread, Old-THUMPER.

[Old-T]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Your first trollish address in this exchange was an insult documenting you to be the pathetic little stalker you are, Old-THUMPER. You lyingly claimed that you never made an insult, Old-THUMPER, and then you lyingly misattributed who it was that hijacked this thread, Old-THUMPER.

Really? Here is my "first post":

Originally Posted by Old-T

Slavery is morally wrong. It always has been. Justifying it by saying "everyone's doing it" is the moral equivalent to "just following orders" at Auschwitz.

Discuss.

Who is that insulting? Slave owners and Nazis. That is all. So if you feel insulted, that means you are a slave owner wannabe, or a Nazi sympathizer, or both. Not a real surprise to many of the people on here, but nice of you to acknowledge it.

As to hijacking, take that up with who you claim hijacked the thread--and that wasn't me.

By the way, which title do you feel should be stated first:

"IB the slave owner wannabe and Nazi sympathizer"

or

"IB, neo-Nazi advocate and deviant with a sex slave fantasy"

Matters not to me.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Old-T

Really? Here is my "first post":

Who is that insulting? Slave owners and Nazis. That is all. So if you feel insulted, that means you are a slave owner wannabe, or a Nazi sympathizer, or both. Not a real surprise to many of the people on here, but nice of you to acknowledge it.

As to hijacking, take that up with who you claim hijacked the thread--and that wasn't me.

By the way, which title do you feel should be stated first:

"IB the slave owner wannabe and Nazi sympathizer"

or

"IB, neo-Nazi advocate and deviant with a sex slave fantasy"

Matters not to me.

You're a dissembling little troll, Old-THUMPER. Your first post in this exchange was at #97, and it was an insult, Old-THUMPER.

[Old-T]

Nope! Wrong again. #8 is significantly earlier than #97, and by 97 you had already turned this into a typical IB insult-fest. It's on you, not me. Isn't it a shame when you accidentally pick on someone who can count and actually enjoys pointing out your lies and your retroactively trying to change the question?

Sucks to be you, IB. And it's obvious in your posts.:tr ampoline:

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Old-T

Nope! Wrong again. #8 is significantly earlier than #97, and by 97 you had already turned this into a typical IB insult-fest. It's on you, not me. Isn't it a shame when you accidentally pick on someone who can count and actually enjoys pointing out your lies and your retroactively trying to change the question?

Sucks to be you, IB. And it's obvious in your posts.:tr ampoline:

You're a lying trollish, stalker, Old-THUMPER. The hijacker posted at #6, and nothing you lyingly claim changes that fact, Old-THUMPER. And you initiated this present to and fro with your trollishly insulting, stalking post at #97, Old-THUMPER, and nothing you lyingly claim changes that fact, Old-THUMPER.

[Old-T]

Just like IB. Ignore posts he wants to pretend aren't there. Accuse people based upon what some 3rd party said. Lie. Divert. Never admit he screwed up and can't even tell which number is bigger--I think you can get a Sesame Street video for that. But Seseme Street is a Liberal Plot to subvert right thinking RWWs so I am sure you wouldn't watch that.

Rant on! Keep telling people this thread starts at post #97. I am sure someone will believe you.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Old-T

Just like IB. Ignore posts he wants to pretend aren't there. Accuse people based upon what some 3rd party said. Lie. Divert. Never admit he screwed up and can't even tell which number is bigger--I think you can get a Sesame Street video for that. But Seseme Street is a Liberal Plot to subvert right thinking RWWs so I am sure you wouldn't watch that.

Rant on! Keep telling people this thread starts at post #97. I am sure someone will believe you.

Show where I, in any manner, addressed your trollish ass in this thread before your stalking ass cast an insult at post #97, Old-THUMPER.

[HoustonMilfDebbie]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

You are free to leave.

Plus one.