Quote:
Originally Posted by onedaddy
Why is it that a provider want so much personal information on the hobbies for screening but when the hobbies ask for the same information to screen the provider the hobbies is wrong or the bad guy for asking, if you want to screen me that's fine do it what you got to hide What's wrong with me screening you? Aren't we both taking the same risk here?
I was called a MF for asking for the same information to that the provider gwensetx was asking me for
|
Honey, that is a simple one to answer. Its about the imbalance between supply and demand. SHe clearly gives the nbecessary infromation about herself on her homepage. Plus , google is your friend to find more. SHe on the other hand does not ask you for personal information for any other reason than to screeen you. That is completey a different reasoning than you apply.
You can see if she has reviews (i don`t for example because that giving out number for sexuak acts is not my style, really and I haven`t signed up to a competition about physically rubbing slippery parts togehter). If she doesn`t she might probably also be one of these persons who chooses to create sensual experiences between people that can`t be reduced to the cumulation of "who did what" and why. For me generally reviews are disgusting. I think (we have that in europe) a n1 to 5 star system might bebetter, because it elaborates the whole session and not just the ability to enter a BJ competition with other providers on the scala 1-10. I strongly and still believe being an escort is not "solely" related to sexual acts. The entertainment and the personality is a very important factor.
ps: and no, clearly you and her are not taking the same risks her. This should be obvious. LE does not put clients in prison. Since the prosecution via law is one-sided and very discriminatory to providers (guys get freebies and no consequences while not screening might possible ruin part of her life), I don`t think you can compare the consequences of her motivation with yours.