Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF
Do your own research.
I could care less if you believe me, you do not believe the CIA nor the military either.
|
I did. And I cited my sources.
Something you are repetitively short on unless its a 10 year old book you've been reading ... on the a subject YOU want to discuss.
Just like "we" cited the military AND the CIA for our time-line/response allegations!!!!
Of course, I recognize that in a 60-minute TV series there is 49 minutes of "action" and therefore one who spends their life feeding on TV series information for their posts would get that confused with multiple attacks in one seige over an 8 hour period.
But that begs the question ... had there been sufficient force in place originally there may not have been any attack that lasted 5 minutes or any attack at all.
Some call it deterrence .. others call it common sense. Something not learned as President of the Harvard Law Review, community organizer, or a Consitutional law professor.
As it played out and is being revealed almost daily, I call it gross-negligence at least and more likely intentional refusal for political purposes. What's a few good men? If one has an upcoming election with a close opponent.