Even al-Qaida Knows that Fox News Isn’t News

[Af-Freakin]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Ok, you're a communist.

A stunningly attractive communist.

In fact, I think you are a CILF!

u r unfunny & creepy. ENOUGH wit the attempted humor already. u r NOT FUNNY. u only make urself look pathetic. u do realize that the waitress @ the hash house only laughs @ ur shit because she wants a good tip, not because ur funny?

as 2 the creepiness, cant u just pm these ladies rather than subject us 2 ur creepiness? its gross. ur pathetic.

whatever happened 2 ur gf TSfatKKKayla?did she finally realize that being fat, dumb & ignorant iz no way 2 live ur life?

[Gotyour6]

4 out of 5 terrorists prefer CNN the the other one is an MSN fan but doesnt matter. He has the bomb belt on.

[LovingKayla]

Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

Only a liberal would take the word of a mass murderer.

.

LOL I was thinking the same thing. Wouldn't just the fact that guy said it, make it so that FOX had MORE credibility?

[LovingKayla]

OH LOL I posted before I saw the parrot post. HI baby!!!! You look so cute over there in your corner. Are they gunna let you up to eat at the big boy table yet?

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

More MSM Lies
NBC fires another journalist for a different distortion in the Zimmerman Case

Lilia Luciano Fired By NBC News Over Botched George Zimmerman Edit
By Jack Mirkinson Updated: 05/ 3/2012 10:36 pm
According to TVNewser, one of Luciano's pieces made a completely new mistake, combining sections from two different portions of the tape to give the misleading impression that Zimmerman said the phrase, "This guy looks like he’s up to no good or on drugs or something. He’s got his hand in his waistband. And he’s a black male."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...6pLid%3D157802

You take a strange view on this. In your hair splitting world, NBC lied by virtue of some of it's employees, who were subsequently fired for their actions, that without sanctioning chose to alter information from it's original form. By that same process to determine guilt, the US Army is responsible for the Ft. Hood shootings.
In a country that personal responsibility is expected from all, you chose to ignore that and assign a collective guilt similar to that embraced by nazi war criminals. They tried to claim they were just following orders and thus there is no individual blame, The American take is that individuals are responsible for their own actions.

NBC discovers a story is inaccurate, fires those responsible, and removes the incorrect information from their website. There is no attempt at a cover-up. Individual responsibility has been enforced.

What other steps should a responsible news outlet take to address this issue?

Are all these steps performed by fox to correct a similar mistake?

This is not proof of NBC irresponsibility. It is proof of a conscious effort to do the right thing to correct a mistake.


This proves something else. No news organization is immune to criticism or being called out for giving misleading/incorrect information to the public. The CBS fake Bush records are another example. Because catching another news network with their pants down is one of the things these guys live for.

The OP is an observation by a media savvy group on the pros and cons of maximum distribution through the various networks. It's not a factual conclusion which network is better than another.

[JD Barleycorn]

The problem with the Zimmerman case (and what that has to do with the thread anyone knows) is that NBC is saying a "mistake" was made. Oops! I made a sllight mistake which wasn't intentional. Three people have been fired for an unintentional mistake. Think about that and respond. An innocent mistake cost three people their jobs. Of course you have to accept the fiction that it was an "innocent mistake" and an intentional altering of the public record. Seems to me that being caught intentionally manufacturing the news would call for mass firings. The person who changed the transcript, the person who editored the audio, the person approved the edits, and the person who idea it was. Seems that we're missing one person. Who do you think that is?

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

You take a strange view on this. In your hair splitting world, NBC lied by virtue of some of it's employees, who were subsequently fired for their actions, that without sanctioning chose to alter information from it's original form. By that same process to determine guilt, the US Army is responsible for the Ft. Hood shootings. * It was the Army’s fault: see below. In a country that personal responsibility is expected from all, you chose to ignore that and assign a collective guilt similar to that embraced by nazi war criminals. They tried to claim they were just following orders and thus there is no individual blame, The American take is that individuals are responsible for their own actions. NBC discovers a story is inaccurate, fires those responsible, and removes the incorrect information from their website. There is no attempt at a cover-up. Individual responsibility has been enforced. What other steps should a responsible news outlet take to address this issue? Are all these steps performed by fox to correct a similar mistake? This is not proof of NBC irresponsibility. It is proof of a conscious effort to do the right thing to correct a mistake. This proves something else. No news organization is immune to criticism or being called out for giving misleading/incorrect information to the public. The CBS fake Bush records are another example. Because catching another news network with their pants down is one of the things these guys live for. The OP is an observation by a media savvy group on the pros and cons of maximum distribution through the various networks. It's not a factual conclusion which network is better than another.

NBC hired those people, and it didn't take any action until its institutional nose was rubbed in its own puddle of piss by another network: Fox News.

*Ft. Hood suspect was Army dilemma His extreme views possibly overlooked in favor of diversity
By Bryan Bender Globe Staff / February 22, 2010
WASHINGTON - Army superiors were warned about the radicalization of Major Nidal Malik Hasan years before he allegedly massacred 13 soldiers at Fort Hood, Texas, but did not act in part because they valued the rare diversity of having a Muslim psychiatrist, military investigators wrote in previously undisclosed reports. http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2010/02/22/ft_hood_suspect_was_army_dilem ma/

*Political correctness on Fort Hood at Pentagon
Debra J. Saunders Tuesday, January 26, 2010
the biggest lesson from Fort Hood should be that a "culture of political correctness" kept concerned officers from reporting Hasan. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/01/25/EDV91BN8CP.DTL#ixzz1tvR4VbuB

*9 officers face disciplinary action in Fort Hood shooting
They failed to flag potential warning signs about suspect. By Jim Miklaszewski Army Secretary John McHugh has ordered disciplinary action against nine officers for allegedly failing to flag any potential warning signs related to Maj. Nidal Hasan, accused of killing 13 soldiers at Fort Hood in November 2009, NBC News has learned. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42017230/ns/us_news-security/t/officers-face-disciplinary-action-fort-hood-shooting/

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

The problem with the Zimmerman case (and what that has to do with the thread anyone knows) is that NBC is saying a "mistake" was made. Oops! I made a sllight mistake which wasn't intentional. Three people have been fired for an unintentional mistake. Think about that and respond. An innocent mistake cost three people their jobs. Of course you have to accept the fiction that it was an "innocent mistake" and an intentional altering

This latest firing pertains to a separate incident involving the alteration of audio evidence by an NBC employee -- it's a matter wholly different from the other two firings. Regarding how this relates, it's meant to counter-pose the OP's post and POV.

[Little Stevie]

Originally Posted by JONBALLS

he should move to Pawwckeeeeeeeesstaaawn,he?d live about a day there, that would be funny to watch,, c?mon man?, live your convictions!!LOL

Originally Posted by JONBALLS

if they weren?t bitching about Fox?, they wouldn?t be threatened by it?

Originally Posted by JONBALLS

haha?, y?ah the people that would vote in an unvetted senator on "HOPE AND CHANGE".. HAHAHA..... HOPE? LOL come on ...if you go into life "hoping" you?r? gonna end up disappointed every time.

it?s a vacant word that?s just floating around waiting for some dupe to embrace it, now off to the next personal growth seminar?

"HOPE?S" ? convenient word though because its not specific so there?s no ACCOUNTABILITY and no way to measure any results?

You just flunked 6th grade writing. Teapublicans don't have to fool smart people to get their LIVS.

The abuse of "dot dot dot", commas, apostrophes and spelling proves you don't pay very close attention to anything. You remind me of the other LIVS (Low Information Voters) here. None of you can think, analyze, spell or write your way out of a paper bag. No wonder you like FAUX!

Your post is just another chilling example of laziness, stupidity or both.

[Randy4Candy]

Stevie, it's just another day in the lives of the parroitriots. They'd be lost without Roger Ailes' crew to provide them with pap to spout. Unfortunatley, Faux Noise Network can't spare editors to correct the parriotriots' typing and spelling.

It was pointed out earlier that the National Socialist Network is registered with the FCC as an "entertainment" network thus avoiding having to own up to what is implied by their name. Ahhh, nothing like a little truth in advertising.

[cptjohnstone]

Originally Posted by Randy4Candy

Stevie, it's just another day in the lives of the parroitriots. They'd be lost without Roger Ailes' crew to provide them with pap to spout. Unfortunatley, Faux Noise Network can't spare editors to correct the parriotriots' typing and spelling.

It was pointed out earlier that the National Socialist Network is registered with the FCC as an "entertainment" network thus avoiding having to own up to what is implied by their name. Ahhh, nothing like a little truth in advertising.

7:56pm about time you head to Micky
d's for your midnight shift? btw in Big 12 sports OSU 3 ZEROU 0

[Randy4Candy]

cpLj, slow day at the feed lot? Your post is a perfect example of a TPer left to come up with his own material.