Quote:
|
When women aren't so much as ranting, which probably is never attractive, but just sharing thoughts about the industry and experiences, do you then think poorly of them?
|
I depends on the rant or whatever in question. My best friend is a provider with whom I've never had a provider/client relationship. I'm well aware that some clients (and escorts) are just sociopaths whose absence from the world of p4p could only be an improvement and I have no reason to disbelieve her.
Quote:
|
Is it a massive turn off? Does it help put things into a little bit of perspective, just understanding the thoughts of companions even when they're more selfish and emotional then logical?
|
Unless what I'm reading is logically coherent and I'm being given what are claimed to be facts (as opposed to judgments and inferences), I have no way to draw my own conclusion. Emotional content only gets in the way of trying to figure out what the actual problem is.
Quote:
|
I personally feel the value of such things is hearing the other side, putting me in check a bit, or at least trying to understand why things happen they way they do.
|
The advantage to leaving out judgments, inferences and emotional content is that by sticking to the facts, both sides are more likely to have a number of things which neither side disputes and which makes discrepancies easier to spot. It helps to state things as clearly and concisely as possible. If that is how a post is written, I can't see why such posts should be seen negatively (or positively). Facts have no morality. They simply are.
