Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Sandbox - National
test
The Sandbox - National The Sandbox is a collection of off-topic discussions. Humorous threads, Sports talk, and a wide variety of other topics can be found here.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 646
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 396
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 278
George Spelvin 265
sharkman29 255
Top Posters
DallasRain70793
biomed163220
Yssup Rider60921
gman4453294
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48646
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42565
CryptKicker37215
The_Waco_Kid36980
Mokoa36496
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-24-2011, 09:59 AM   #31
Guest040616
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 15,047
Encounters: 8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joe bloe View Post
The reason I find it "not acceptable" is that it's not constitutional. The states have the legal authority over this issue not the federal government.
It does not seem to me that 7 Supreme Court Justices did not agree with your interpretation that "it's not constitutional." Apparently you feel that you are right and they were all wrong!

Ok, I believe I understand now!
Guest040616 is offline   Quote
Old 12-24-2011, 10:15 AM   #32
joe bloe
Valued Poster
 
joe bloe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 10, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 5,740
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigtex View Post
Apparently, 7 Supreme Court Justices did not agree with your interpretation that "it's not constitutional." Apparently you feel that you are right and they were all wrong!

Ok, I believe I understand now!
Five of the current Supreme Court justices would burn the constitution if they could. I agree with the four current justices that oppose the Roe vs Wade decision. These are the judges that rule based on original intent which is the only legitimate way to rule. I don't think the Roe vs Wade decision would be seven to two today. With the replacement of one liberal justice, I think Roe vs Wade will be history. Never forget the Supreme Court does make mistakes and it does reverse itself.

Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), also known as the Dred Scott Decision, was a ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court that people of African descent brought into the United States and held as slaves (or their descendants,[2] whether or not they were slaves) were not protected by the Constitution and could never be U.S. citizens

With any luck at all we can get a new conservative Republican president that will replace a couple of the Marxists on the court with judges that actually believe they should rule based on the clear meaning of the constitution instead of writing law from the bench.
joe bloe is offline   Quote
Old 12-24-2011, 10:30 AM   #33
Guest040616
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 15,047
Encounters: 8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joe bloe View Post
Five of the Supreme Court justices would burn the constitution if they could. I agree with the four justices that oppose the Roe vs Wade decision. These are the judges that rule based on original intent which is the only legitimate way to rule.

With any luck at all we can get a new conservative Republican president that will replace a couple of the Marxists on the court with judges that actually believe they should rule based on the clear meaning of the constitution instead of writing law from the bench.
Thanks for confirming that you're a "sore loser!" <----------Enjoy!
Guest040616 is offline   Quote
Old 12-24-2011, 11:07 AM   #34
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigtex View Post
Apparently, 7 Supreme Court Justices did not agree with your interpretation that "it's not constitutional." Apparently you feel that you are right and they were all wrong!

Ok, I believe I understand now!
The Supreme Court rarely gets it right. I guess you support the Kelo and Citizens United decisions, too. Along with Dred Scott, of course.
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 12-24-2011, 12:37 PM   #35
Guest040616
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 15,047
Encounters: 8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy View Post
The Supreme Court rarely gets it right. I guess you support the Kelo and Citizens United decisions, too. Along with Dred Scott, of course.
Please provide the link where I registered a complaint against any of those decisions. Once you have done so we will then discuss it!
Guest040616 is offline   Quote
Old 12-24-2011, 12:49 PM   #36
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

You implied that if we think the Court is wrong, then we must think that we are smarter than the Court. I simply cited some examples that followed your reasoning. I can't help it if you're an idiot.
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 12-24-2011, 01:18 PM   #37
AdventureAdams
Account Disabled
 
User ID: 35460
Join Date: Jul 13, 2010
Location: Houston.
Posts: 2,577
My ECCIE Reviews
Default

Genocide is the force removal and extermination of a type of persons.

How can PP be a part of black genocide when it is up to the woman to decide if she want's to keep the baby.

This is not like the holocaust, a time of forced sterilization, child experiments, and brutally assaulting pregnant women in order for them to have miscarriages.

This is a first world country no one is dragging impoverished ppl or minorities into PP offices to get abortions.

Rick Perry is not going to win presidency he is just an old pretty boy hoping on the "Traditional Values" bandwagon.
AdventureAdams is offline   Quote
Old 12-24-2011, 01:38 PM   #38
Guest040616
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 15,047
Encounters: 8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy View Post
You implied that if we think the Court is wrong, then we must think that we are smarter than the Court. I simply cited some examples that followed your reasoning. I can't help it if you're an idiot.
I did not imply anything more than what I stated "it does not seem to me that 7 Supreme Court Justices did not agree with your interpretation that it's not constitutional. Apparently you feel that you are right and they were all wrong!"

Had you been paying closer attention then you surely would have noticed that I clearly stated the following a few posts earlier (post #27 of this thread): "From a personal perspective, I do not believe in abortion. I understand how and why others might feel differently and respect their right to have a different opinion. Who am I to say they are right or wrong for believing the way they do? At the end of the day, nobody died and appointed me God!"

In other words, the US Supreme Court made their ruling and I will live with it. The fact that I may or may not agree with it in inconsequential. I implied nothing else but what I stated. If you choose to read something more into my words, you do so at the risk of me labeling someone I previously thought was just a blowhard, an idiot!

Idiot!
Guest040616 is offline   Quote
Old 12-24-2011, 01:41 PM   #39
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

At least you didn't call me a neocon.

BTW, when I said "idiot" I was being nice, in the Spirit of Festivus! Don't rile me next week, I won't be as nice!

CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 12-24-2011, 01:55 PM   #40
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkylarCruzWantsYou View Post
Genocide is the force removal and extermination of a type of persons.

How can PP be a part of black genocide when it is up to the woman to decide if she want's to keep the baby.

This is not like the holocaust, a time of forced sterilization, child experiments, and brutally assaulting pregnant women in order for them to have miscarriages.

This is a first world country no one is dragging impoverished ppl or minorities into PP offices to get abortions.

Rick Perry is not going to win presidency he is just an old pretty boy hoping on the "Traditional Values" bandwagon.


Skylar, do not point out facts to these cry babies on the right. Logic is not their strong suit. They love killing innocent people in the name of security but when you talk about embro they get all righteous.

If we told them it was a Muslim terrorist baby they'd be all for abortion! LOL

They shit their pants and give up all kinds of liberties in the name of security.
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 12-24-2011, 02:01 PM   #41
Guest040616
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 15,047
Encounters: 8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy View Post
At least you didn't call me a neocon.

BTW, when I said "idiot" I was being nice, in the Spirit of Festivus! Don't rile me next week, I won't be as nice!

If I am fortunate enough to "rile" you next week I will consider it as my personal sacrifice for the good of the Board!
Guest040616 is offline   Quote
Old 12-24-2011, 04:45 PM   #42
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigtex View Post
If I am fortunate enough to "rile" you next week I will consider it as my personal sacrifice for the good of the Board!
LOL! Beware!

CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved