Explain To Me..........

[burkalini]

I can remember talking to providers other than the ones on this thread that have told me about how certain hobbyist in town they would never see because of something that happened along time ago. They also told me they told many many providers about them also. I'm sure the providers used this information to decide if they wanted to see these guys or not. Some of stories the hobbyist were pretty bad and deserved it but some it was just a session where they didn't get along. This is very common. I don't rehash a simple session but repetitive occurences I do and will continue to do so

[kendra kayy]

Originally Posted by AJKinNE

100% off subject here.....but......how is this the first time Ive seen your profile picture? lol hey congrats on having awesome tits! lol

Lol well Ty very much AJKinNE!!

MP, I've learned in the past year how much of a distraction boobies can be..before my surgery I didn't realize how much power they hold!! I must say, my boobs were a great investment!!

Back to the subjuect at hand.
Again, its not the problem of the negative comments or reviews. It's a matter of constant posting of the same thing each time a lady is reviewed. But Boomer said it right...reviews are for the gents not us ladies.

[omaha]

This site makes it a little harder to quickly review reviews than some of the others. So I appreciate any comments because I may not read every review of the provider. I do like to see consistency in reviews for providers. It's a sign that they mesh well with all types of clients. TER for example makes it very easy for me to quickly spot out of the ordinary reviews. There are obvious downsides there with reviews requiring approval, etc..... No site is perfect.

[Tori Hastings]

Frankly, I think that people who have not reviewed the provider should not be able to comment on the reviews. Negative comments ruin a good review.

Everyone's experience will be different. The fella reviewing wanted to tell people about his experience - not hear about yours.

Private messages made to be shown that someone posted something private (like their name shows but not the comment) makes the provider freak out or wonder what was said. Then starts the drama.

I think most men would hopefully see past those comments and want to give a provider a chance anyway.

I just think that if it's a positive review, don't post negative on it. It's rude. If you must post something that isn't positive or something you want to be kept private, make sure to do the private message tags correctly so your name doesn't even show up that you posted something private.

[Guest090116-1]

Often the reason for any private comment is because it references something that is stated in the "Rest of the Story" and thus not visible to all. It's a rule on this site.

It would be pointless to allow comments on the specific details in the ROS section to be drawn out over comments that are visible to all.

[Tori Hastings]

I guess you aren't understanding what I'm saying.

I have been told that there is a way to post private comment tags without your name being seen that you even posted anything.

It seems that a lot of the people posting private comments aren't doing it correctly because while what they say can't be seen, everyone can see that they said something that is "invisible".

If done properly, you shouldn't even see a blank post. Example... you can see what I mean. This shouldn't be showing up.

[farmstud60]

I never tried the private thing, so thought I would I put a private comment up above

[farmstud60]

[farmstud60]

Tori,

testing a couple ways to use the private tag, and unless there is a secret way to do it that I don't know about, a person's name will always show. If you know of a way to do it that the name doesn't show, please share.