Should I change my name?

[Guest021716-4]

As some may or may not know I am independent, but worked at a spa part time under a different name. We (girls) wanted to keep our Indy status separate from the spa in the event their were ever any legal implications. Now that I am no longer there and have reviews under both spa and Indy I am not sure how to go about this as I am both a fbsm and companionship provider. The majority of my reviews are fbsm.

Thank you,

Scarlett/Natasha

[ztonk]

The reviews are associated with the lady, not the agency or spa. If you can send me links to the reviews that belong to you, we can reassign them to the proper handle.

z

[Guest021716-4]

Awesome!! Thank you

[Whispers]

Originally Posted by ztonk

The reviews are associated with the lady, not the agency or spa. If you can send me links to the reviews that belong to you, we can reassign them to the proper handle.

z

Before doing that.....

Shouldn't you consider the relationship between "Natasha" and Bliss

Perhaps Bliss may not want full service reviews of ladies associated with their business for legal reasons.... IF in fact there was a need for FS ladies to work by another handle it makes sense that making changes could negatively impact the Spa....

More than one lady here has worked under and still has reviews under a previous handle.

Positive reviews of "Natasha" are probably beneficial to Bliss and making changes to those reviews would not be the right thing to do.

MANY boards around the country do not allow the ladies to leave an agency or spa and keep the same name.... because the name and rep is often built BY the Agency or Spa.....

[Guest021716-4]

There were no fs reviews there, and I built my own reviews. No one else did my sessions. This is something you don't even know the half of. You couldn't get anymore biased. If someone wants to speak, let them speak. I asked, because I want to do what's best for all, not what's best for someone else. I got answer and that's the end of it. Indy name stays, I have my reviews, everyone is happy.

[Whispers]

I wasn't speaking in regards to FS being done there.

Just as to reviews of "Natasha" if there are any, being changed in name to Scarlett...

Then you would have reviews of a spa session mixed with reviews of FS under one provider name which could lead to confusion about what services the spa provides.

There is no bias in my comments...

I am "someone". I spoke.

I was questioning the Mod.... Something I am known to do at times if I do not agree with their actions.

This is not about you.

[Bliss Austin]

I have no problem with a former Bliss tenant requesting that her reviews be connected to her new/existing Independent identity. The ladies are the ones conducting the session, and the reviews belong to them.

However, there are multiple reasons that we don't allow a tenant to work under Bliss under the same name as her GFE/escort identity. One of the most pressing reasons is that there should be no confusion about the services the escort offers versus the services a therapist at Bliss offers. These need to be differentiated not just because of legal liability, but also for the therapists' safety. We've already had a few instances where we had to "fire" clients for pushing for sexual services, and some of them have referenced therapists that are no longer with us, saying "Well, so and so did xyz with me." Having the lines blurred only makes it easier for clients to expect things they shouldn't be able get here.

So, this is my proposition. I see the reviews have already been transferred to Scarlett, so she can reap the benefits of any reviews she earned while at the studio. Can a mod edit the former Bliss reviews to delete any reference to Bliss or its other tenants, so that the lines between the two "types" of encounters are clearly delineated?

[Vyt]

Unfortunately, we can't edit reviews for content in such a manner. I don't think confusion over what services are expected should be a problem (well, any more so than is already the case).