Obama To America’s Enemies: ‘I Will Veto Any Effort To Maintain U.S. National Security’

[Marshall]

Obama To America’s Enemies: ‘I Will Veto Any Effort To Maintain U.S. National Security’

November 24, 2011
One of the characteristics of “God damn America” is that we would have a president who is determined to gut our national security when we need it the most.
Which is precisely why Obama is trying to gut our military when we need it the most.
Here’s what OBAMA’S OWN SECRETARY OF DEFENSE SAID ABOUT CUTTING OUR MILITARY BUDGET:

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has warned of the possible damage to national security with a supercommittee failure. That warning is echoed by leaders of every service and by others.
They are worried because the same Budget Control Act that gives unprecedented power to the special panel of six Republicans and six Democrats also comes with what Panetta calls a “doomsday mechanism” in case a majority of committee members refuse to reach a deal.
The mechanism — sequestration — forces future defense budgets and some popular entitlement programs to take across-the-board cuts. For defense, the deepest cut would occur in 2013, followed by automatic cuts of up to $55 billion a year for eight more years. This would be on top of $465 billion in defense cuts already planned over the next decade.
Recently, Panetta laid out in new detail what will befall defense programs if “maximum” sequestration is triggered so defense cuts total almost $1 trillion over the decade.
“The impacts…would be devastating,” Panetta wrote. In fiscal 2013, assuming the president exercises his authority to exempt military personnel accounts from automatic cuts, a 23-percent cut “would have to be applied equally to each major investment and construction program” of the Department of Defense, leaving “most of our ship and construction projects unexecutable — you cannot buy three quarters of a ship or a building.”
Many civilian workers would be furloughed, Panetta said.
“The situation does not get better” beyond 2013, he added, with cuts of up to $100 billion a year possible compared to the 2012 defense budget.
“Rough estimates suggest after 10 years of these cuts, we would have the smallest ground force since 1940, the smallest number of ships since 1915, and the smallest Air Force in its history,” Panetta wrote.
Wartime funding for Afghanistan would not be directly impacted, the secretary explained, but war efforts would suffer.
“Contracting personnel would be cut, resulting in delays in the contracts and the contract oversight that support the war. Payroll personnel would be cut, resulting in late payments to wartime vendors, and legal and policy support would be disrupted,” Panetta advised.

That’s what Obama’s OWN Secretary of Defense says.
Here’s what our Traitor-in-Chief says to those who care about their country:

“My message to them is simple: No. I will veto any effort to get rid of those automatic spending cuts to domestic and defense spending. There will be no easy off ramps on this one.”

As we speak, the United States Navy is preparing to lay off 3,000 mid-level career sailors with ten years of experience who form the BACKBONE of our ability to protect our nation.
It won’t be long before Iran gets the nuclear bomb and the means to deliver that bomb. The day they do, they will be able to launch a wave of international terrorism and they will be able to block the Strait of Hormuz. With impunity.
George Bush TRIED to keep America safe from the Iranian threat. But Democrats - and in particular Barack Hussein Obama, Joe Biden and Hillary Rodham Clinton – did everything they could to successfully frustrate the safeguarding of America from its worst enemies:

THE NATION – Democrats rip Bush’s Iran policy
Presidential candidates say a new intelligence report shows that the administration has been talking too tough.
By Scott Martelle and Robin Abcarian
December 05, 2007
Democratic presidential candidates teamed up during a National Public Radio debate here Tuesday to blast the Bush administration over its policy toward Iran, arguing that a new intelligence assessment proves that the administration has needlessly ratcheted up military rhetoric.
While the candidates differed somewhat over the level of threat Iran poses in the Mideast, most of them sought to liken the administration’s approach to Iran with its buildup to the war in Iraq.

It’s not enough to say that they were completely wrong. They were DEAD wrong. They were TRAITOR wrong.
Meanwhile, on top of Iran moving full-speed ahead in developing nuclear weapons, Russia just threatened the United States with a clear act of war because they understand that Barack Hussein Obama is a feckless puke who is dismantling our ability to stand up and fight as quickly as he possibly can:

Medvedev threatens to target U.S. missile shield in Europe if no deal is reached
By Will Englund and William Wan, Updated: Wednesday, November 23, 6:02 AM
MOSCOW — President Dmitry Medvedev said Wednesday that Russia will target the American missile defense system in Europe with its missiles if Moscow cannot reach an agreement with Washington and NATO on how the system will be built and operated.

Russia just threatened Obama with World War III unless Obama backs down like the pencil-necked little coward they know he is.
Even during the height of the Soviet Union’s power, Russia would never have DARED to say anything that threatening to Ronald Reagan.
But then again, Ronald Reagan wasn’t a weak, pathetic, gutless fool who despised the United States of America.
And the Russians knew that Ronald Wilson Reagan – unlike Barack Hussein Obama – would stand up for the United States in a strong, powerful way.

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by Marshall

Obama To America’s Enemies: ‘I Will Veto Any Effort To Maintain U.S. National Security’

Originally Posted by Marshall

It figures the title of this "article" would lie about a quote they say Obama made. Get your rubber boots on. It gets deeper the farther in you go.
November 24, 2011
One of the characteristics of “God damn America” is that we would have a president who is determined to gut our national security when we need it the most.
Which is precisely why Obama is trying to gut our military when we need it the most.
Here’s what OBAMA’S OWN SECRETARY OF DEFENSE SAID ABOUT CUTTING OUR MILITARY BUDGET:
Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has warned of the possible damage to national security with a supercommittee failure. That warning is echoed by leaders of every service and by others.
They are worried because the same Budget Control Act that gives unprecedented power to the special panel of six Republicans and six Democrats also comes with what Panetta calls a “doomsday mechanism” in case a majority of committee members refuse to reach a deal.
The mechanism — sequestration — forces future defense budgets and some popular entitlement programs to take across-the-board cuts. For defense, the deepest cut would occur in 2013, followed by automatic cuts of up to $55 billion a year for eight more years. This would be on top of $465 billion in defense cuts already planned over the next decade.
Recently, Panetta laid out in new detail what will befall defense programs if “maximum” sequestration is triggered so defense cuts total almost $1 trillion over the decade.
“The impacts…would be devastating,” Panetta wrote. In fiscal 2013, assuming the president exercises his authority to exempt military personnel accounts from automatic cuts, a 23-percent cut “would have to be applied equally to each major investment and construction program” of the Department of Defense, leaving “most of our ship and construction projects unexecutable — you cannot buy three quarters of a ship or a building.”
Many civilian workers would be furloughed, Panetta said.
“The situation does not get better” beyond 2013, he added, with cuts of up to $100 billion a year possible compared to the 2012 defense budget.
“Rough estimates suggest after 10 years of these cuts, we would have the smallest ground force since 1940, the smallest number of ships since 1915, and the smallest Air Force in its history,” Panetta wrote.
Wartime funding for Afghanistan would not be directly impacted, the secretary explained, but war efforts would suffer.
“Contracting personnel would be cut, resulting in delays in the contracts and the contract oversight that support the war. Payroll personnel would be cut, resulting in late payments to wartime vendors, and legal and policy support would be disrupted,” Panetta advised.
Not a word about repubs who knew about the results of no agreement before hand.
That’s what Obama’s OWN Secretary of Defense says.
Here’s what our Traitor-in-Chief says to those who care about their country:
“My message to them is simple: No. I will veto any effort to get rid of those automatic spending cuts to domestic and defense spending. There will be no easy off ramps on this one.”
As we speak, the United States Navy is preparing to lay off 3,000 mid-level career sailors with ten years of experience who form the BACKBONE of our ability to protect our nation.
Typical misrepresentation. From the article.

“The Navy recently reviewed 16,000 sailors in 31 job categories where it had surpluses; all had served between 7 and 14 years. The Navy was looking for extra sailors to layoff.
"It can come down to a particular rating is simply over-manned, and we just have to reduce the number of people within that rating", said Smith.
These jobs range from aviation electricians to religious program specialists. In June, the Navy allowed sailors to apply to transfer to under-manned ratings, like medical professionals, to avoid being let go.”

It was like when I was in the Army. What do you call a helicopter mechanic who finishes in the bottom third of his class? An OJT truck mechanic. These positions are all excess personnel. The ones that could adapt changed MOSs. The others will change employers. They will always be honored for their service but they are not guaranteed 20 years of employment and a for life pension. But conservatives, real conservatives know that.
It won’t be long before Iran gets the nuclear bomb and the means to deliver that bomb. The day they do, they will be able to launch a wave of international terrorism and they will be able to block the Strait of Hormuz. With impunity. They will never reach the level of impunity this website uses to publish it's bullshit.
George Bush TRIED to keep America safe from the Iranian threat. But Democrats - and in particular Barack Hussein Obama, Joe Biden and Hillary Rodham Clinton – did everything they could to successfully frustrate the safeguarding of America from its worst enemies:
THE NATION – Democrats rip Bush’s Iran policy
Presidential candidates say a new intelligence report shows that the administration has been talking too tough.
By Scott Martelle and Robin Abcarian
December 05, 2007
Democratic presidential candidates teamed up during a National Public Radio debate here Tuesday to blast the Bush administration over its policy toward Iran, arguing that a new intelligence assessment proves that the administration has needlessly ratcheted up military rhetoric.
While the candidates differed somewhat over the level of threat Iran poses in the Mideast, most of them sought to liken the administration’s approach to Iran with its buildup to the war in Iraq.
It’s not enough to say that they were completely wrong. They were DEAD wrong. They were TRAITOR wrong.
Meanwhile, on top of Iran moving full-speed ahead in developing nuclear weapons, Russia just threatened the United States with a clear act of war because they understand that Barack Hussein Obama is a feckless puke who is dismantling our ability to stand up and fight as quickly as he possibly can:
Medvedev threatens to target U.S. missile shield in Europe if no deal is reached
By Will Englund and William Wan, Updated: Wednesday, November 23, 6:02 AM
MOSCOW — President Dmitry Medvedev said Wednesday that Russia will target the American missile defense system in Europe with its missiles if Moscow cannot reach an agreement with Washington and NATO on how the system will be built and operated.
Another bone for the stupid crowd. The vast majority of strategic missiles/rockets are already targeted on something. Do you think they will try to enter targets into a missile when there is a 12 minute flight time from the Med or 30 minutes from the US? All it means is they will be added to the target list. And like the locations weren't added some time ago anyways.
Russia just threatened Obama with World War III unless Obama backs down like the pencil-necked little coward they know he is. Yep. He sure rolled over for bin laden
Even during the height of the Soviet Union’s power, Russia would never have DARED to say anything that threatening to Ronald Reagan. Wearing your ignorance like a badge of honor. Targeting was not a threat, it was a promise. Again, big fucking deal. We are no closer to war with Russia now than we have been in years.
Reagan didn't outfight the Russians, he outspent them.
But then again, Ronald Reagan wasn’t a weak, pathetic, gutless fool who despised the United States of America.
And the Russians knew that Ronald Wilson Reagan – unlike Barack Hussein Obama – would stand up for the United States in a strong, powerful way.

First off I would like to say this article comes from a website published by cowards. They are afraid to not misrepresent stories and issues because that would render their positions untenable.
They post opinion as God's truth when it comes from men with flaws that are at least as great as those they assail.

Marshall not only cut and pasted this article from a "conservative" website that would make real conservatives cringe, he cut and pasted part of their title header to be his signature.
Visit the site for a quick look at the cut and paste world of the Ha Ha man.

[Guest040616]

It is apparent to me that the world is a safer place without OBL.

And as an added bonus Quadafi has joined OBL. And it did not cost one American life!

Thank you for making us safer, Mr. President!