Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliver Closeoff
I hear you, she isn't my type either, and looks eventually fade away, beauty only lasts so long. The saying beauty is only skin deep is so true.
And no, regardless which magazine she poses for, if she does, I won't buy it.
Don't they usually have some 60 mins on interviewing the jurors and their rationale in the verdict after alot of the big trials? I would definately want to see that.
I don't know all the ins and outs of the case, just followed it a little bit on the Internet, but I definately would like the juror's perspectives on this.
It isn't surprisingly something like that showed up on Ebay.
|
Juror #11 who was the foreman, has been interviewed stating two things:
1) The jurors were frustrated that the state failed to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt.
2) The jurors felt that there was something off about Mr. Anthony, Casey's father, and that the whole story was not told. They felt something fishy.
here are a couple links to those articles:
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/07/11...-never-forget/
http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/ent...eren-says.html
As for Casey, we all have our suspicions; we all have our doubts; some of us get angry, disguisted, appalled.
The truth is, the only "blame" to put on anyone for her acquittal should be on the state. The burden is on the accuser to prove guilt. The law clearly states "innocent until proven (and proof beyond a reasonable doubt) guilty".
If there was no way for them to prove this, then Casey's acquittal shows that our justice system WORKS.
When others have been arrested and the cops are badmouthing alledged criminals, no one hesitates to yell "innocent until proven guilty". We all remember this law then, why not now?
Don't get me wrong, I'm not a casey supporter. Just an American who is very proud of the justice system my country has. Ask Amanda Knox if Italy's court system is as fair.
My two cents.
xoxo,
Kira