Starlink cheated America must have a recount

[Tiny]

OK, I'm starting to have some slight doubts. Etherea has some interesting info. And she's hot. If you're good at multi-tasking you can whack off while you learn a little about how big money politics works.

https://x.com/AesPolitics1/status/1855473656547209370

[Why_Yes_I_Do]

Originally Posted by winn dixie

Read the link above or read what busty posted . Good grief

I'm even wondering if'n ya'll understand basic IP communications. Starlink is just a carrier interface. Think of it like a Cat6A cable or WiFi router, just the next hop in a chain. Said chain can be broken on any link.

As to Linux, there is not a bloody thing you can't do with the system with little effort. You can turn anything off or on in the blink of an eye at any moment or slice and dice any way you want.

if=eth0
sudo ip link set $if down

[Why_Yes_I_Do]

Originally Posted by Tiny

OK, I'm starting to have some slight doubts. Etherea has some interesting info. And she's hot. If you're good at multi-tasking you can whack off while you learn a little about how big money politics works.

https://x.com/AesPolitics1/status/1855473656547209370

Imma just say it straight up - she is the IT version of Kamala Harris. I can only listen to that ditz in 90 second increments, yet check out her cleavage tats for hours.

[corona]

I think I found the issue

[texassapper]

LOL... my mind is blown... and wouldnt that be some cosmic justice if it were really true?

[Jacuzzme]

[Why_Yes_I_Do]

Originally Posted by corona

I think I found the issue

Probably got deported or reburied somewhere else.

[biomed1]

To return to the Original Topic . . .

#6 - Respect the topics presented by those who start a thread. Attempts to derail a thread or change it's direction is referred to as thread hijack and will be discouraged. Attempts to guide a thread in the right direction are appreciated, while responses to posts which hijack a thread are not.

[Why_Yes_I_Do]

Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

I'm even wondering if'n ya'll understand basic IP communications. Starlink is just a carrier interface...

Back to topic of: Starlink cheated and gave election to trumpf. With Starlink just being a node in the middle, as opposed to an endpoint, it would have to be an egregious man-in-the-middle hack, which could easily be avoided with basic end to end encryption. Not to mention turning off their connectivity links when not needed.

Stated differently, it is a basic function of the end points to protect the communication between them so that no node in the communication path can listen-in to the conversation.

Note sure if ya'll are familiar with the command tracert or traceroute (older). It can show you how many hops (links in the chain) occur between two end points. Star link would be in the middle of the chain most likely.

[ICU 812]

The characterization of a paranoid kook wearing a hat made from aluminum foil o ward off government mind conerol radiation is classic. Yet no one is characterized that way if they avoid or minimize their exposure to or use of the internet and cell phones.

Check out the following:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TdZZoDShGyk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AM7h0OOdLhI

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/l-AU3nKb6II

[winn dixie]

Starlink was in the 7 swing states.
Nuff said
Recount coming
Me political insiders have said so.
Indeed.

[Unique_Carpenter]

winn is correct.
But, there's several dozen over the US so there's more coverage than just the seven swing states.

However, Nov 12th, news report, CNET, Starlink-4682 burned up during reentry over Oklahoma.
There's currently approx 6 thous Starlinks currently in operation.
So dozens more need to be fried somehow to stop Skynet from interfering with human activity.

And then, a total new vote is required. Approx 4 years from now so there's time to deal with Starlink.

/s

BTW, Check this link:
https://satellitemap.space/?constellation=starlink

[Why_Yes_I_Do]

Originally Posted by winn dixie

Starlink was in the 7 swing states...

What you said there is entire misleading and patently false on so many fronts.

What you call "Starlink", in that context, is basically a glorified cable modem, except instead of interfacing with a cable, it uses a satellite dish. On the other side of said cable modem is the LAN which is comprised of one or more end points (nodes). Likely tabulating devices and a single terminal for accessing ekky while working.

Said "cable modem" would not have a frick'n clue what encrypted data would be flowing through an encrypted pipe to a distant end point. At best, it would only know the next hop towards the ultimate data destination. In this case a satellite overhead, as part of a constellation of satellites, which likewise would only know the next hop, i.e. link, in the communication chain.