TSA Failed to Assess Risks Associated With Releasing Illegal Aliens Into US Without ID

[The_Waco_Kid]

thanks "Border Czar" Harris!!!

TSA Failed to Assess Risks Associated With Releasing Illegal Aliens Into US Without ID

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/saraha...ut-id-n2645672


wait .. who's in charge here? Joey Cornpoop or the "Boarder Cunt" ??

the "dark shadows" Manchurian is in charge.







The Biden-Harrs Department of Homeland Security admitted to letting illegal immigrants into the United States without thoroughly vetting them for security risks.

According to a recent heavily redacted DHS Inspector General report, Customs Border and Protection (CPB), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) failed to assess the risks associated with releasing illegal aliens into the U.S. without proper identification. They allowed them to travel on domestic flights.

Under current processes, CBP and ICE cannot ensure they are keeping high-risk noncitizens without identification from entering the country. Additionally, TSA cannot ensure its vetting and screening procedures prevent high-risk noncitizens who may pose a threat to the flying public from boarding domestic flights. Noncitizens without Transportation Security Administration (TSA)- acceptable identification are allowed to board domestic flights. TSA’s vetting and screening procedures do not eliminate the risk that noncitizens who may pose a threat to fellow passengers could board domestic flights.

TSA currently relies on data and background checks regarding illegal aliens from CBP and ICE to determine if a person is a threat. However, if there is insufficient data, “TSA’s methods to screen individuals who pose a threat would not necessarily prevent these individuals from boarding flights.”






According to ICE, its funded detention capacity of 41,500 beds does not allow them to detain every illegal immigrant who doesn’t have ID and valid documents. Meanwhile, the CBP said that detention facilities are “short term” only, and it cannot legally hold illegal immigrants in detention facilities longer than the law states.
The Biden-Harris DHS claimed that the report contained “inaccurate statements.”

The Inspector General’s report contains inaccurate statements, lacks important context, and is misleading about the Department’s efforts to verify the identity of noncitizens seeking entry into the United States and screening noncitizens flying domestically. DHS rejects the OIG’s core recommendations because they are premised on a fundamental misunderstanding of our policies and processes—which already incorporate numerous measures to minimize risk, identify those who pose a potential public safety or national security threat, and detain or refer to law enforcement those who do. OIG’s report also does not reflect policy and procedural updates DHS implemented this year to improve security in accordance with TSA’s normal risk assessment process. This includes updated standard operating procedure at TSA checkpoints to ensure noncitizens without acceptable forms of identification undergo facial matching technology or be denied entry to secure areas of the airport. DHS continuously evaluates its procedures and processes to make adjustments, as needed, with the core goal of protecting public safety.

Rep. Mark Green (R-TN) described it as “embarrassing” that the Biden-Harris Administration has allowed millions of illegal aliens to enter the U.S. and that they should not be allowed to fly among American citizens freely.



“It's embarrassing that the Biden-Harris administration needs an official government watchdog to tell them what anyone with the slightest bit of common sense intuitively understands,” Green said. “This administration should not be letting unvetted non-citizens roam free in our communities and get on planes, especially when their identities cannot even be verified. The colossal failures documented by the OIG are bad enough—even worse is that they are happening on a daily basis with the blessing of the Biden-Harris White House.”


bahahahahaaaaaaaa the "Border Cunt: fails again

[txdot-guy]

Originally Posted by Salty Again

... Pardon, if I don't think this is a big deal.

#### Salty

Although this is a different topic, As Salty says, I don’t think this is a big deal.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

Although this is a different topic, As Salty says, I don’t think this is a big deal.

correct.

IT'S A HUGE DEAL.

thank you valued poster

[txdot-guy]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

correct.

IT'S A HUGE DEAL.

thank you valued poster

No it’s not.

“The Inspector General’s report contains inaccurate statements, lacks important context, and is misleading about the Department’s efforts to verify the identity of noncitizens seeking entry into the United States and screening noncitizens flying domestically. DHS rejects the OIG’s core recommendations because they are premised on a fundamental misunderstanding of our policies and processes—which already incorporate numerous measures to minimize risk, identify those who pose a potential public safety or national security threat, and detain or refer to law enforcement those who do. OIG’s report also does not reflect policy and procedural updates DHS implemented this year to improve security in accordance with TSA’s normal risk assessment process. This includes updated standard operating procedure at TSA checkpoints to ensure noncitizens without acceptable forms of identification undergo facial matching technology or be denied entry to secure areas of the airport. DHS continuously evaluates its procedures and processes to make adjustments, as needed, with the core goal of protecting public safety.”

This is merely partisan politics at best and ass covering at worst.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

No it’s not.

“The Inspector General’s report contains inaccurate statements, lacks important context, and is misleading about the Department’s efforts to verify the identity of noncitizens seeking entry into the United States and screening noncitizens flying domestically. DHS rejects the OIG’s core recommendations because they are premised on a fundamental misunderstanding of our policies and processes—which already incorporate numerous measures to minimize risk, identify those who pose a potential public safety or national security threat, and detain or refer to law enforcement those who do. OIG’s report also does not reflect policy and procedural updates DHS implemented this year to improve security in accordance with TSA’s normal risk assessment process. This includes updated standard operating procedure at TSA checkpoints to ensure noncitizens without acceptable forms of identification undergo facial matching technology or be denied entry to secure areas of the airport. DHS continuously evaluates its procedures and processes to make adjustments, as needed, with the core goal of protecting public safety.”

This is merely partisan politics at best and ass covering at worst.

not protecting our borders isn't a big deal ?


if you say so

[txdot-guy]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

not protecting our borders isn't a big deal ?


if you say so

I do say so. What exactly does this article have to do with protecting our borders? It has to do with vetting people who might fly on planes.

As I understand it you must have valid ID before you can get on a plane. can you explain to me how undocumented people can get on to a plane without an ID. And if they do have a state ID the REAL ID act will change the process starting next year.

On May 7, 2025, new identification laws for domestic travel will take effect under the REAL ID Act. The Real ID Act enforces minimum standards for state licenses used for domestic travel.

And even if they pass all the requirements for said ID, The terrorist you are afraid of still has to bypass all the extra security measures put in place after 9/11.

If you really want to solve the border issue, rather than use it as a partisan weapon, then tell your congressman to sit down and compromise with the other side and write some legislation that actually fixes the problem.

PS Maybe we should be more worried about our own home grown nut jobs rather than fixating on the people who are requesting asylum at the border. Or better yet maybe we can act like adults and do both.

[Salty Again]

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

Although this is a different topic, As Salty says, I don’t think this is a big deal.

... But since you used me-own name here, mate.

... SALTY sayes - "This IS a Big Deal!"

They FAILED to assess the risks of doing-so. ...

#### Salty

[txdot-guy]

Originally Posted by Salty Again

... But since you used me-own name here, mate.

... SALTY sayes - "This IS a Big Deal!"

They FAILED to assess the risks of doing-so. ...

#### Salty

I used your post just as a reference to my own. Not trying to speak for you. Apologies if anyone took it that way.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

I do say so. What exactly does this article have to do with protecting our borders? It has to do with vetting people who might fly on planes.


everything because if Biden WAS protecting the border these people wouldn't even be here.


As I understand it you must have valid ID before you can get on a plane. can you explain to me how undocumented people can get on to a plane without an ID. And if they do have a state ID the REAL ID act will change the process starting next year.


read the article. it states that they DID in fact let these completely undocumented illegals board planes and travel.



On May 7, 2025, new identification laws for domestic travel will take effect under the REAL ID Act. The Real ID Act enforces minimum standards for state licenses used for domestic travel.


again read the article


And even if they pass all the requirements for said ID, The terrorist you are afraid of still has to bypass all the extra security measures put in place after 9/11.

If you really want to solve the border issue, rather than use it as a partisan weapon, then tell your congressman to sit down and compromise with the other side and write some legislation that actually fixes the problem.

PS Maybe we should be more worried about our own home grown nut jobs rather than fixating on the people who are requesting asylum at the border. Or better yet maybe we can act like adults and do both.

HDG already showed there are several automatic strikes for asylum. they may have a right to apply (unless they already have and were denied then it's a automatic rejection) but without vetting these people there no way to know.


people that know they can't apply for asylum because they've been rejected before or know they have disqualifications are intentionally not bringing any id or documents .. TO AVOID BEING REJECTED ON THE SPOT.


do you think some person does NOT know they have a criminal record? of course they know.

clearly you didn't read the article yet you always claim an OIG report is biased again Biden.


of course Biden's DOJ "claims" this. if you did bother to read it then you clearly support open borders without any questions at all and given citizenship no questions asked.

prove the Biden claims its inaccurate.. this should be interesting.

[txdot-guy]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

HDG already showed there are several automatic strikes for asylum. they may have a right to apply (unless they already have and were denied then it's a automatic rejection) but without vetting these people there no way to know.


people that know they can't apply for asylum because they've been rejected before or know they have disqualifications are intentionally not bringing any id or documents .. TO AVOID BEING REJECTED ON THE SPOT.


do you think some person does NOT know they have a criminal record? of course they know.

clearly you didn't read the article yet you always claim an OIG report is biased again Biden.


of course Biden's DOJ "claims" this. if you did bother to read it then you clearly support open borders without any questions at all and given citizenship no questions asked.

prove the Biden claims its inaccurate.. this should be interesting.

I don’t have to prove a negative. Get back to me when you have some kind of proof that this is an actual problem rather than just fear mongering and ass covering.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

I don’t have to prove a negative. Get back to me when you have some kind of proof that this is an actual problem rather than just fear mongering and ass covering.

no but you do have to prove your claims, which are the OIG report is not factual, not accurate and best of all partisan rhetoric

[txdot-guy]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

prove the Biden claims its inaccurate.. this should be interesting.

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

no but you do have to prove your claims, which are the OIG report is not factual, not accurate and best of all partisan rhetoric

These are not my claims and you know it. You wrote it in your own post.

The Department of Homeland Security responded and that response is included in the article you referenced.

It reads:

The Inspector General’s report contains inaccurate statements, lacks important context, and is misleading about the Department’s efforts to verify the identity of noncitizens seeking entry into the United States and screening noncitizens flying domestically. DHS rejects the OIG’s core recommendations because they are premised on a fundamental misunderstanding of our policies and processes—which already incorporate numerous measures to minimize risk, identify those who pose a potential public safety or national security threat, and detain or refer to law enforcement those who do. OIG’s report also does not reflect policy and procedural updates DHS implemented this year to improve security in accordance with TSA’s normal risk assessment process. This includes updated standard operating procedure at TSA checkpoints to ensure noncitizens without acceptable forms of identification undergo facial matching technology or be denied entry to secure areas of the airport. DHS continuously evaluates its procedures and processes to make adjustments, as needed, with the core goal of protecting public safety.

If you choose to disregard the Statement from the DHS you have the right to do so but I have the right to agree with said position and call the TSA a bunch of idiots who are covering their own asses.

This entire thread is about a bunch of fear mongering to push a political narrative about the “evil” immigrants, then blaming the other side and the refusal to accept their own part in this fiasco we call immigration policy.

[Lucas McCain]

All I will say, txdot is the ignore button can be your friend when going back and forth with many of the MAGAs in this forum... just trying to save you some time.

If your facts are not MAGA approved bullshit facts, none of what you type matters to that programmed person and before you know it, you are running around in circles with that person and going nowhere.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

These are not my claims and you know it. You wrote it in your own post.

The Department of Homeland Security responded and that response is included in the article you referenced.

It reads:

The Inspector General’s report contains inaccurate statements, lacks important context, and is misleading about the Department’s efforts to verify the identity of noncitizens seeking entry into the United States and screening noncitizens flying domestically. DHS rejects the OIG’s core recommendations because they are premised on a fundamental misunderstanding of our policies and processes—which already incorporate numerous measures to minimize risk, identify those who pose a potential public safety or national security threat, and detain or refer to law enforcement those who do. OIG’s report also does not reflect policy and procedural updates DHS implemented this year to improve security in accordance with TSA’s normal risk assessment process. This includes updated standard operating procedure at TSA checkpoints to ensure noncitizens without acceptable forms of identification undergo facial matching technology or be denied entry to secure areas of the airport. DHS continuously evaluates its procedures and processes to make adjustments, as needed, with the core goal of protecting public safety.

If you choose to disregard the Statement from the DHS you have the right to do so but I have the right to agree with said position and call the TSA a bunch of idiots who are covering their own asses.

This entire thread is about a bunch of fear mongering to push a political narrative about the “evil” immigrants, then blaming the other side and the refusal to accept their own part in this fiasco we call immigration policy.

if you cite that bald headed prick Mayorkas as your "rebuttal" you simply want total open borders in the US and will cite the very asshole who is driving this mass herd of millions right into the US


citing Mayorkas proves you have nothing to prove your claims

[txdot-guy]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

if you cite that bald headed prick Mayorkas as your "rebuttal" you simply want total open borders in the US and will cite the very asshole who is driving this mass herd of millions right into the US


citing Mayorkas proves you have nothing to prove your claims

Again, I didn’t cite anyone. The opinion writer Sarah Arnold, the person who wrote the article for the Town Hall website, the person who you cited in your original post, is the one who cited Mayorkas. Click on the link you provided and you’ll find it there.