Supreme Court overturns Chevron

[ICU 812]

overturning "Chevron" could have far-reaching ramifications in diverse areas of regulation, from farming, and the fisheries, to manufacturing and the regulation of firearms.

The bump stock ruling, while a separate litigation, is related to the overturn of Cevron.

[farmstud60]

Originally Posted by Diligaf

No man...it's all "DEMONCRAT LIES" lol

I'm sure farmstud enjoys duking it out with Monsanto, assuming he's not already reaping the benefits of patented food sources that make their way by wind into the fields.

Of course that assumes he's any sort of farmer, and it's not simply a hooker board name.

Monsanto hasn't existed for probably close to 10 years now.

[Diligaf]

Originally Posted by farmstud60

Monsanto hasn't existed for probably close to 10 years now.

Oh yeah...you got me there. They're Bayer now, who I'm sure loved that Roundup litigation. It doesn't diminish the point that without federal agencies, corporations would buttfuck everyone even more than they do now.

Also, I doubt all the farmers want the government to butt out of the subsidies they hand out. Handouts are fine as long as it keeps the farmers going.

[texassapper]

When OHSA unilaterally mandated that tens of millions of private sector workers take the COVID shot or wear masks, appellate courts cited the Chevron doctrine for allowing it

It's important that the Chevron deference is dead

[Diligaf]

Originally Posted by texassapper

When OHSA unilaterally mandated that tens of millions of private sector workers take the COVID shot or wear masks, appellate courts cited the Chevron doctrine for allowing it

It's important that the Chevron deference is dead

Absolutely! It should all be thrown out because folks had to wear a mask!

Good thing it will probably change banking regulations. We can always count on the banks to look out for people!

[texassapper]

Originally Posted by Diligaf

Absolutely! It should all be thrown out because folks had to wear a mask!

Not much on reading are you... Vaccine Mandate.. I wrote nothing about masks. (Not that those weren't a retarded response either, but hey... forcing people to inject experimental drugs into their bodies to fight the flu is probably a bit worse)

Originally Posted by Diligaf

Good thing it will probably change banking regulations. We can always count on the banks to look out for people!

Oh my Gosh! If we didn't have those unelected apparatchiks looking out for us, we'd all be really screwed!

[Diligaf]

Originally Posted by texassapper

Oh my Gosh! If we didn't have those unelected apparatchiks looking out for us, we'd all be really screwed!

Looks like you're finally getting it. I haven't seen any evidence that most of the brainiac righty rubes can protect themselves from poor decision making.

[farmstud60]

Originally Posted by Diligaf

Oh yeah...you got me there. They're Bayer now, who I'm sure loved that Roundup litigation. It doesn't diminish the point that without federal agencies, corporations would buttfuck everyone even more than they do now.

Also, I doubt all the farmers want the government to butt out of the subsidies they hand out. Handouts are fine as long as it keeps the farmers going.

Actually most government regulation increases the cost for business to start up and ends up reducing competition for corporations and increasing costs for everyone. It has the exact opposite effect of what you posted.

[texassapper]

Originally Posted by farmstud60

It has the exact opposite effect of what you posted.

Does it? At this point shouldn't we just accept that THAT IS EXACTLY the desired outcome of liberal policies in spite of what they say. It's the only way to explain their repeated attempts to implement failed policies over and over no matter how many people have to di.