Quote:
Originally Posted by AspenCalifornia
You just don't get it, do you? Let me break down a real life scenario so that even you can understand -
1. promoter posts a review and says the pictures on the website are accurate
2. monger sees review and bases his next appointment on promoter's review
3. monger can only hobby 1 time per month (whether it be because of time constraints, not being able to get away from SO, etc.)
4. Monger has limited funds, so 1 time per month is all he can really afford
5. Monger sees girl from original promoter review and realizes quickly that the girl looks nothing like photos, her age has been embellished in multiple promoters review
6. Therefore his TIME and MONEY are both wasted on something that could have been avoided.
How in the world is this so hard for you promoters to understand? How is it not a reasonable request to just be truthful and honest when you write reviews so that mongers don't waste time and money?!?! Mongers bear some responsibility for this, but not every monger is diligent about researching or maybe they're new and don't know who the promoters are. My point is that the pictures issue can be avoided. Let's just hope Mango's pictures somewhat resemble her because we know they aren't her pictures.
|
Aspen the problem is that you make too much sense and promoters have to resort to bashing and name calling to combat the truth. Keep up the good work.
