A Judge Asked Trump to Chill. Trump Mocked the Judge’s Wife.

[onawbtngr546]

https://www.vice.com/en/article/y3wg...isks-gag-order


He's a toddler. The judge is going to give him a gag order, then he's going to say that is political prosecution.

“I have a Trump-hating judge with a Trump-hating wife and family, whose daughter worked for Kamala Harris and now receives money from the Biden-Harris campaign,” Trump said.

How sad of a man child do you have to be to resort to schoolyard bullying tactics?

He's a grown man, entering his twilight years. He's not a child. Yet he acts like one.

[bambino]

Pssst…. Pass it around


https://t.me/candlesinthenight/53774

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by onawbtngr546

https://www.vice.com/en/article/y3wg...isks-gag-order


He's a toddler. The judge is going to give him a gag order, then he's going to say that is political prosecution.




How sad of a man child do you have to be to resort to schoolyard bullying tactics?

He's a grown man, entering his twilight years. He's not a child. Yet he acts like one.

Quote:
“I have a Trump-hating judge with a Trump-hating wife and family, whose daughter worked for Kamala Harris and now receives money from the Biden-Harris campaign,” Trump said.

the judge and his wife are Trump hating uber liberals and the judge donated to an anti-Trump pac.


his bias is known fact and he should be removed from the case if he won't recuse himself.

[berryberry]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

the judge and his wife are Trump hating uber liberals and the judge donated to an anti-Trump pac.


his bias is known fact and he should be removed from the case if he won't recuse himself.

Now, now - don't confuse him with facts.

Any honest judge in the same situation would recuse himself for the conflict of interest.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by berryberry

Now, now - don't confuse him with facts.

Any honest judge in the same situation would recuse himself for the conflict of interest.

sorry bro. facts do matter.

[Chase7]

Flaming liberal Dershowitz is stating no way Trump can get a fair trial in NY city.
The judge for the trail overseen the Grand Jury, he approved all of that, now can’t rule there is any bias.

The DA “Judge Shopped”. Manhattan is 85% Democrats. “The fix is in”.

[onawbtngr546]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

the judge and his wife are Trump hating uber liberals and the judge donated to an anti-Trump pac.


his bias is known fact and he should be removed from the case if he won't recuse himself.

So... it is fine for a big name celerity, like Trump, to harass a judge and his family, because the judge doesn't like the defendant?



No, I'm sorry. This twisted logic doesn't work in the world of adults. Trump knows what he is doing, and he is trying to derail the trial by causing duress on the judge.



Once again, no sane adult in his twilight years would be doing this.

[berryberry]

Originally Posted by onawbtngr546

So... it is fine for a big name celerity, like Trump, to harass a judge and his family, because the judge doesn't like the defendant?

Pointing out that the judge on the case has a proven bias and is a Trump-hater with a Trump-hating wife and family, AND whose daughter worked for Kamala Harris and now receives money from the Biden-Harris campaign are ACTUAL FACTS, something you seem to be missing.

Why are you confused by these actual facts?

[Jacuzzme]

Telling the truth about someone is harassment now? Tough shit. Find an unbiased judge and jury and there won’t be a problem.

[berryberry]

Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

Telling the truth about someone is harassment now? Tough shit. Find an unbiased judge and jury and there won’t be a problem.

And look at this

Judge Juan Merchan, who is overseeing former President Donald Trump’s case in Manhattan, violated New York’s Code of Judicial Conduct by making three donations to Democrats in 2020, which could be grounds for an ethics investigation, according to several legal experts and former prosecutors.

Under Section 100.5 of the New York Code of Judicial Conduct, sitting judges cannot “directly or indirectly engage in any political activity.” Prohibited political activity includes “(h) soliciting funds for, paying an assessment to, or making a contribution to a political organization or candidate.”

The New York State Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics’s yearly-updated handbook makes this clear, stating:

A sitting judge may not make political contributions at any time, even to a U.S. presidential candidate or to a federal congressional candidate outside of New York State (Opinion 11-146; 22 NYCRR 100.5[A][1][h]).

Furthermore, the American Bar Association’s Model Code of Judicial Conduct states that unless permitted by law, a judge shall not “solicit funds for, pay an assessment to, or make a contribution to a political organization or a candidate for public office.”

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...investigation/