Wrong. You like the word "radicalized".
On the other hand, her use of the word is correct (in the single use I found by her).
In case you missed the midterms, your favorite word cost repubs the senate. I would say the reversal of roe vs.wade was the move of a radicalized court. Just because you can't understand the talking points you are instructed to repeat, doesn't mean most of us don't.
She is an investigational reporter, winner of several news awards (something the fox opinion crew is lacking). Plus I would like add that your take/opinion on her opinions doesn't mean anything in the larger scope of things. Maybe one day you'll understand why your "logic" isn't logic.
Using your criteria, this woman makes carlson look like a tool, while lacking any credentials in the world we live in.
Your notion she is biased just because she has written about an obvious issue, and telling the truth about it, would cause any carlson fan to soil his jammies. His nightly rants about subjects he knows are lies shows true lack of credibility.
So now we've settled the issue of which sources are credible and which sources (people and network sources)knowingly lie to their viewers, we can rule you out as a source of reliable info.
Exposing the lies and misinformation of your people is important.
Tell you what, you provide proof she has lied in a column,
I'll start in on the fox POSs.
You've personally been caught lying on too many occasions to recount them here.
You can go now.
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn
Yes, the source...Ms Calmes has several articles about the radicalization of the GOP and a book about the radicalization of the Supreme Court under the GOP. She likes that word "radicalization" but probably doesn't understand it's meaning.
|
Of course she knows what the word means. If she didn't, she would look it up. Something you should have done but didn't.
Gop again ignores rule of law and us constitution
