Trump told Former White House employee told to move classified documents

[Tigbitties38]

Very tight noose. A bunch of new stuff from the Jan 6th hearing too.
We can do that in a new thread tomorrow.


"A Trump employee has told federal agents about moving boxes of documents at Mar-a-Lago at the specific direction of the former president, according to people familiar with the investigation, who say the witness account — combined with security-camera footage — offers key evidence of Donald Trump’s behavior as investigators sought the return of classified material.

The witness description and footage described to The Washington Post offer the most direct account to date of Trump’s actions and instructions leading up to the FBI’s Aug. 8 search of the Florida residence and private club, in which agents were looking for evidence of potential crimes including obstruction, destruction of government records or mishandling classified information.

The people familiar with the investigation said agents have gathered witness accounts indicating that, after Trump advisers received a subpoena in May for any classified documents that remained at Mar-a-Lago, Trump told people to move boxes to his residence at the property. That description of events was corroborated by the security-camera footage, which showed people moving the boxes, said the people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss an ongoing investigation.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...p-boxes-moved/

[1blackman1]

None of that matters to the silly Trumpys on this site. They still believe things like declassification, evidence being planted and he never knew classified docs were in the boxes. Some even believe as long as he wasn’t selling the docs to Russians it’s no harm no foul.

The facts keep piling up. Trump took the docs, knew what they were, refused to return them for over a year while lying about what he had. The funniest part is that had he just returned the docs when first asked, he’d have no legal jeopardy.

If the folks on the right had the slightest bit of integrity they’d stop defending him. But they don’t have even a minutia of integrity anymore.

[Jacuzzme]

Did he have them cut the grass too? Scrub shit stains off the toilets? Such corruption.

[Tigbitties38]

Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

Did he have them cut the grass too? Scrub shit stains off the toilets? Such corruption.

Hijack attempt.

[Tigbitties38]

Bump.

This thread will stay near top

[the_real_Barleycorn]

Bump all you want. If the Washington Bezo Post is your source, then you don't have very much to show. We could ask your girlfriend for confirmation which is something the Post can't do.

[Tigbitties38]

Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

Bump all you want. If the Washington Bezo Post is your source, then you don't have very much to show. We could ask your girlfriend for confirmation which is something the Post can't do.

In other words, you have nothing to say on topic.
Something that has not stopped your babbling in the past.
Mods?

[oilfieldace]

1/6 committee is a joke and other than costing millions doesn’t move the needle other than to see just how truly lost and pathetic the libs really are

[HedonistForever]

Originally Posted by Tigbitties38

In other words, you have nothing to say on topic.
Something that has not stopped your babbling in the past.
Mods?

If you have a complaint, hit the RTM button, don't be "antagonistic", that's what the Mod told me, just passing it on.

[Tigbitties38]

Originally Posted by HedonistForever

If you have a complaint, hit the RTM button, don't be "antagonistic", that's what the Mod told me, just passing it on.

You're right. That's what the mod told you. You needed to be told.

And now you need to told you aren't a mod either. Since you hit the RTM button and he ignored you, take a hint.

Now stay on topic and stop trying to hijack this thread

[biomed1]

Of Guidelines # 1, 3 & 4 . . .

• #1 - Avoid cases of unprovoked rudeness to others. No place for it here. Yes, with the dynamic nature of the threads and topics, tempers will flare and things will become heated from time to time. You may often encounter individuals who become passionate or emotional when expressing one's opinion or point of view. That's all understood and perfectly acceptable within reason…….but, start slamming or bashing another member and be met with consequences.
• #3 - Disrespect to others, IN GENERAL, will be considered an item of low tolerance, especially when posting in our coed forums. Follow the Golden Rule and treat others as you wish to be treated yourself. This applies to fellow members as well as staff. We do not require that you have respect for us, but we do require that you treat us respectfully in the public forums. If you feel the need to vent, gripe, or blow off some steam regarding a staff member's action or decision, we ask that you keep it private. Email, RTM, or the PM system would be the appropriate avenue to take in such cases. In cases where you would like to request additional clarity about a staff decision, you are free to pursue an answer in either a public forum or private means of communication. If handled publicly, post your inquiry in a respectful manner.
• #4 - Blatant insults or hostility toward another member will be met with staff intervention. This applies to using our coed forums for name calling, personal attacks, or vulgar slang terms to describe fellow members. If you have legitimate concerns about another member here, share them tactfully in the appropriate private forums or with staff.

[Precious_b]

Oh, you had to go there and tell him that T38?

Don't hear anyone saying how much the Bengazi hearing cost.

Kinda hard to refute that you didn't take documents that didn't belong to you when you and yours repudiated having any multiple times and more and more turned up after each official denial.