Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
646 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Jon Bon |
389 |
Harley Diablo |
375 |
honest_abe |
362 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
You&Me |
281 |
Starscream66 |
273 |
George Spelvin |
261 |
sharkman29 |
255 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 70680 | biomed1 | 62376 | Yssup Rider | 60212 | gman44 | 53216 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 48392 | WTF | 48267 | pyramider | 46370 | bambino | 41262 | CryptKicker | 37178 | Mokoa | 36491 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | The_Waco_Kid | 35644 | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
09-06-2022, 12:02 PM
|
#1
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Nov 11, 2012
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 16,225
|
The REAL Big Lie
Lawsuit Documents Reveal OVER 50 BIDEN ADMINISTRATION EMPLOYEES, 12 US Agencies Involved in Social Media CENSORSHIP
Senile Biden’s White House worked with social media companies to censor Election, COVID and Hunter Biden information - illegally determining what you can and cannot see.
Senile Biden’s White House censored the truth and pushed the lies. This is still being done about everything. They’re lying about everything. And actively covering up the truth.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 2 users liked this post
|
09-06-2022, 12:06 PM
|
#2
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Nov 11, 2012
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 16,225
|
Discovery in NCLA's lawsuit against the Biden Admin has revealed that scores of federal officials across at least 11 federal agencies have secretly communicated with social-media platforms to censor & suppress private speech.
The New Civil Liberties Alliance, the Attorney General of Missouri, and the Attorney General of Louisiana, have filed a lawsuit that blows the lid off a sprawling federal censorship regime that will shock the conscience of Americans. The joint statement on discovery disputes in the lawsuit, State of Missouri ex rel. Schmitt, et al. v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., et al., r eveals scores of federal officials across at least eleven federal agencies have secretly communicated with social-media platforms to censor and suppress private speech federal officials disfavor. This unlawful enterprise has been wildly successful.
Under the First Amendment, the federal government may not police private speech nor pick winners and losers in the marketplace of ideas. But that is precisely what the government has done—and is still doing—on a massive scale not previously divulged. Multiple agencies’ communications demonstrate that the federal government has exerted tremendous pressure on social-media companies—pressure to which companies have repeatedly bowed.
Discovery has unveiled an army of federal censorship bureaucrats, including officials arrayed at the White House, HHS, DHS, CISA, the CDC, NIAID, the Office of the Surgeon General, the Census Bureau, the FDA, the FBI, the State Department, the Treasury Department, and the U.S. Election Assistance Commission. Communications show these federal officials are fully aware that the pressure they exert is an effective and necessary way to induce social-media platforms to increase censorship. The head of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency even griped about the need to overcome social-media companies’ “hesitation” to work with the government.
These actions have precipitated an unprecedented rise in censorship and suppression of free speech—including core political speech—on social-media platforms. Many viewpoints and speakers have been unlawfully and unconstitutionally silenced or suppressed in the modern public square. This unlawful government interference violates the fundamental right of free speech for all Americans, whether or not they are on social media. More discovery is needed to uncover the full extent of this regime—i.e., the identities of other White House and agency officials involved and the nature and content of their communications with social-media companies.
The government has been uncooperative and has resisted complying with the discovery order every step of the way—especially with regard to Anthony Fauci’s communications. Defendants claim, for example, that White House communications are privileged, even though such privilege does not apply to external communications. The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana should overrule the government defendants’ objections and order them to supply this highly relevant, responsive, and probative information immediately.
https://nclalegal.org/2022/09/ncla-s...censor-speech/
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 2 users liked this post
|
09-06-2022, 02:18 PM
|
#3
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Nov 11, 2012
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 16,225
|
BREAKING JUST NOW from the Missouri Attorney General:
In our lawsuit against the Biden Admin for colluding with social media companies to censor speech, the Court just ordered DOJ to produce records from key WH & HHS officials like Dr. Fauci, the WH Press Secretary, and others.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
09-06-2022, 04:17 PM
|
#4
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Sep 26, 2021
Location: down under Pittsburgh
Posts: 9,694
|
... More Investigations for Next Year.
When Republicans control the Congress...
#### Salty
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
09-06-2022, 04:24 PM
|
#5
|
Gaining Momentum
Join Date: Jan 18, 2016
Location: Gulf Shores, Al
Posts: 49
|
You are right on track. Hell even Zuckerberg was on TV admitting the government was telling him to supress the Hunter laptop story and so to speak "keep it off the front page" during the election. Those words were directly from him and he said they complied so as to not get the powers to be mad at him. So right on berryberry !!
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 3 users liked this post
|
09-06-2022, 10:17 PM
|
#6
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Sep 26, 2021
Location: down under Pittsburgh
Posts: 9,694
|
... The FBI hid Tony Bobulinski's testimony and buried
ANYTHING concerning the shady laptop revelations.
A great number of people have said that the TRUTH
about "Big Guy" Joe would have made them vote differently.
THAT is how you RIG the election and steal it from Trump.
#### Salty
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 2 users liked this post
|
09-06-2022, 11:19 PM
|
#7
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Nov 11, 2012
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 16,225
|
The always insightful - liberal - Glenn Greenwald:
The regime of censorship being imposed on the internet – by a consortium of DC Dems, billionaire-funded "disinformation experts," the US Security State, and liberal employees of media corporations – is dangerously intensifying in ways I believe are not adequately understood.
A series of "crises" have been cynically and aggressively exploited to inexorably restrict the range of permitted views, and expand pretexts for online silencing and deplatforming. Trump's election, Russiagate, 1/6, COVID and war in Ukraine all fostered new methods of repression.
During the failed attempt in January to force Spotify to remove Joe Rogan, the country's most popular podcaster – remember that? – I wrote that the current religion of Western liberals in politics and media is censorship: their prime weapon of activism.
But that Rogan failure only strengthened their repressive campaigns. Dems routinely abuse their majoritarian power in DC to explicitly coerce Big Tech silencing of their opponents and dissent. This is *Govt censorship* disguised as corporate autonomy.
There's now an entire new industry, aligned with Dems, to pressure Big Tech to censor. Think tanks and self-proclaimed "disinformation experts" funded by Omidyar, Soros and the US/UK Security State use benign-sounding names to glorify ideological censorship as neutral expertise.
The worst, most vile arm of this regime are the censorship-mad liberal employees of big media corporations Masquerading as "journalists," they align with the scummiest Dem groups to silence and deplatform.
It is astonishing to watch Dems and their allies in media corporations posture as opponents of "fascism" - while their main goal is to *unite state and corporate power* to censor their critics and degrade the internet into an increasingly repressive weapon of information control.
A major myth that must be quickly dismantled: political censorship is not the by-product of autonomous choices of Big Tech companies. This is happening because DC Dems and the US Security State are threatening reprisals if they refuse.
But the worst is watching people whose job title in corporate HR Departments is "journalist" take the lead in agitating for censorship. They exploit the platforms of corporate giants to pioneer increasingly dangerous means of banning dissenters. *These* are the authoritarians.
This is the frog-in-boiling-water problem: the increase in censorship is gradual but continuous, preventing recognition of how severe it's become. The EU now legally *mandates censorship of Russian news. They've made it *illegal* for companies to air it.
So many new tactics of censorship repression have emerged in the West: Trudeau freezing bank accounts of tucker-protesters; Paypal partnering with ADL to ban dissidents from the financial system; Big Tech platforms openly colluding in unison to de-person people from the internet.
All of this stems from the classic mentality of all would-be tyrants: our enemies are so dangerous, their views so threatening, that everything we do – lying, repression, censorship – is noble. That's what made the Sam Harris confession so vital: that's how liberal elites think.
This is why I regard the Hunter Biden scandal as uniquely alarming. The media didn't just "bury" the archive. CIA concocted a lie about it (it's "Russian disinformation"); media outlets spread that lie; Big Tech censured it -- because lying and repression to them is justified!
The authoritarian mentality that led CIA, corporate media and Big Tech to lie about the Biden archive before the election is the same driving this new censorship craze. It's the hallmark of all tyranny: "our enemies are so evil and dangerous, anything is justified to stop them."
How come **not one media outlet** that spread this CIA lie – the Hunter Biden archive was "Russian disinformation" – retracted or apologized? This is why: they believe they are so benevolent, their cause so just, that lying and censorship are benevolent.
The one encouraging aspect: as so often happens with despotic factions, they are triggering and fueling the backlash to their excesses. Sites devoted to free speech – led by Rumble, along with Substack, Callin, and others – are exploding in growth.
But as these free speech platforms grow and become a threat, the efforts to crush them also grow – exactly as AOC, other Dems and their corporate media allies successfully demanded Google, Apple and Amazon destroy Parler when it became the single most-popular app in the country.
It is hard to overstate how much pressure is now brought to bear by liberal censors on these free speech platforms, especially Rumble. Their vendors are threatened. Their hosting companies targeted. They have accounts cancelled and firms refusing to deal with them. It's a regime.
It's not melodrama or hyperbole to say: what we have is a war in the West, a war over whether the internet will be free, over whether dissent will be allowed, over whether we will live in the closed propaganda system our elites claim The Bad Countries™ impose. It's no different.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 2 users liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|