Encounter: Seeking Xxkxt in LC

[Scifinut632]

User ID: -
Date: 12/29/2020
Name: Katie
Phone: Given through text
Email Address: -
URL (Profile or Bio Page): https://www.seeking.com/member/10dd2...c-d0b0f3204997
City: Las Cruces
State: New Mexico
Address: hotel near university
Appointment Type: Incall
Activities: DATY, BBBJ, Mish, lazy doggie, Doggie, LFK, MSOG
Duration of Encounter: Multi-hour
Hair Length and Color: Shoulder length Auburn with purple highlights I believe
Age: 19
Smoking Status: Non-Smoker
Ethnic Background: Hispanic
Physical Description: About 5'6" curvy in all the right areas and amazing big and firm ass, nice sized breasts and just all around pretty cute.
Recommendation: Yes

[EPT101]

Can we get a phone number?

[HulkBrogan]

She looks nice!

[abqspencer]

Originally Posted by EPT101

Can we get a phone number?

Your best bet would be to message her through the Seeking site, seeing as she's on there as a sugar baby and not a provider advertising somewhere (that we know of anyway).

[Diego Smith]

We actually had this discussion on the board a while ago...SBs are not really providers in that the process for choosing who to meet is very different than providers. (We can all debate "prostitution" and "escort" and "SB" -- please understand that the previous discussion centered on the PROCESS FOR CHOOSING who to meet.)

There was a general consensus that it was ok to review SBs, but that contact info should not be shared. If an encounter report piques your interest in a POT SB, then you should go through the process of contacting her in the manner she has chosen -- through one of the SB sites.

My two cents: I don't review SBs (although it would save me a TON of money) because I typically see women who truly want to be SBs -- i.e., they want to find one or two exclusive guys and develop a real arrangement -- so they are not looking for a steady stream of guys. I think, however, that each guy should make up his own mind about an encounter and whether or not to review it. Regardless, I would strongly encourage guys NOT to share contact info on SBs at all, and especially in an encounter report. It could put a nice woman in a spot where she has to change cell phones, email addresses, or in extreme cases, residences.

Please remember that not every member of ECCIE is playing by the same set of rules. And even some good guys may not really understand the sugar world and how comfortable contacts are carried out.

[EOD]

^^^^^^this.

[abqspencer]

Originally Posted by Diego Smith

We actually had this discussion on the board a while ago...SBs are not really providers in that the process for choosing who to meet is very different than providers. (We can all debate "prostitution" and "escort" and "SB" -- please understand that the previous discussion centered on the PROCESS FOR CHOOSING who to meet.)

There was a general consensus that it was ok to review SBs, but that contact info should not be shared. If an encounter report piques your interest in a POT SB, then you should go through the process of contacting her in the manner she has chosen -- through one of the SB sites.

My two cents: I don't review SBs (although it would save me a TON of money) because I typically see women who truly want to be SBs -- i.e., they want to find one or two exclusive guys and develop a real arrangement -- so they are not looking for a steady stream of guys. I think, however, that each guy should make up his own mind about an encounter and whether or not to review it. Regardless, I would strongly encourage guys NOT to share contact info on SBs at all, and especially in an encounter report. It could put a nice woman in a spot where she has to change cell phones, email addresses, or in extreme cases, residences.

Please remember that not every member of ECCIE is playing by the same set of rules. And even some good guys may not really understand the sugar world and how comfortable contacts are carried out.

Agreed

I still don't like the practice of reviewing SB's. UNLESS she's known to advertise elsewhere or is UTR and it's known. Still, no contact info.

[Diego Smith]

One more thing that I forgot to mention this morning, and I think most guys will see the logic of this -- all escorts and most AMPs have a specific email for business and a separate phone number. You have to be a VERY special guy to get a personal number to an escort or AMP woman.

SBs, on the other hand, very often use their regular phone for Seeking activity....the number that they give you after they decide to text with you is the same number their mother uses, that is sitting on the table when they have dinner with family or friends, etc. Putting that number on a board like this could cause them all sorts of personal problems. In 3+ years in the bowl, I have met very few women that were using a second number for sugaring.

Please be careful how you deal with contact data for these women. I personally won't share it at all.

[joyote]

I would not review a provider from SA...
- UNLESS at her request
- and ONLY if she agreed to include contact info

[Scifinut632]

Hey everyone wanted to just chime in. As I mentioned in the review she was messaging a lot of people though SA and text during my visit. This review is more meant for people on SA that may be hesitating on a meet or debating on whether or not to message. One person on here has already contacted that he wasn't sure if she was real but will now commit. I will not share any of her contact information you will have to message her first through SA so she can decide whether she will give you that information or not.

[Msn212]

I have a date with her tonight let’s see how it goes.