Barr on the Horowitz report

[dilbert firestorm]

Watch as AG Barr Calmly Shapes C-4 Into the Image of Durham, Places It Under 'Nothing to See Here’ Take on IG Report


https://pjmedia.com/trending/watch-a...-on-ig-report/
video at end of post.


Here are the big takeaways from Barr’s exclusive to NBC News:

• Believes the predicate to start the “full-blown counterintelligence investigation” of the Trump campaign in the first place was “flimsy”
• The FBI spied on the Trump campaign and believes that “this is the first time in history that… the use of these counterintelligence techniques [have been used] against a presidential campaign”
• That “this campaign and administration has been dominated by this investigation that it turns out to be completely baseless”
• “Inexplicable” that investigators talked to Russians before they ever talked to Trump campaign

I think the big picture is this. From day one… of this investigation on July 31st, 2016, and all the way to its end in September 2017, there was not one bit of incriminatory evidence to come in. It was all exculpatory … So what happens? The FBI ignores it and presses ahead. Withholds… critical exculpatory information from the [FISA] Court while it gets an electronic surveillance warrant. It withholds from the Court clear-cut evidence that the dossier that they ultimately relied on to get the FISA warrant, was a complete sham. They hid information about the lack of reliability even the first time they went for a warrant but in January after the election, the entire case collapsed after the principal source says "I never told Steele this stuff."


... At that point, when their entire case collapsed, what do they do? They kept on investigating the president well into his administration… But here to me is the damning thing. They not only didn’t tell the court that what they were relying on was completely rubbish, they actually started putting in things to bolster the Steele report by saying, "Well, we talked to the sources and they appear to be truthful. But don’t inform the court that what they’re truthful about is that the dossier is false."


Barr named four things Durham is looking into:

• How the investigation got started.
• “If the narrative that Trump being involved in the [election] interference actually preceded July and was, in fact, the precipitating trigger for the investigation.”
• The conduct of the investigation that was not included in the IG Report.
• The post-election investigation that continued after the FBI case had “collapsed.”

Williams asked if he still agreed that the Trump campaign had been spied on: “Oh, it was clearly spied upon. I mean, that’s what electronic surveillance is. I think wiring people up to go in and talk to people and make recordings of their conversations is spying. I think going through people's emails, which they did as a result of the FISA warrant" is spying.


Barr said that the “irregularities, these misstatements, these omissions” by the FBI in its investigation “leaves open the possibility to infer bad faith.”

[HoeHummer]

[dilbert firestorm]

looks like you have a problem with bad faith actors.

[Chung Tran]

the Horowitz report is like the Mueller report.. it gave both "sides" a reason to claim victory. each side says it was "exonerated", "vindicated", because they parcel what they want from the reports.

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by Chung Tran

the Horowitz report is like the Mueller report.. it gave both "sides" a reason to claim victory. each side says it was "exonerated", "vindicated", because they parcel what they want from the reports.

parcel? I think you mean parse.

[Chung Tran]

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

parcel? I think you mean parse.

don't parse words with me