Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 646
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 396
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 279
George Spelvin 265
sharkman29 255
Top Posters
DallasRain70796
biomed163313
Yssup Rider61018
gman4453296
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48674
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42739
CryptKicker37220
The_Waco_Kid37099
Mokoa36496
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-05-2019, 11:34 AM   #1
bb1961
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 5, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 7,104
Default Obummer DHS comfirms it...Presidential candidates want open boarders.

This is a story out of the WAPO...behind pay wall and I won't pay for bird cage liner.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/immig...=.39493ebbe5d3

YR you and the left should be proud...this is a real winner in 2020!!
YR the "IDEA" you spoke of...BRILLIANT!!
You got the room in your cave YR??
This is an small excerpt from the article on WAPO:


An Obama-era Department of Homeland Security chief is warning Democratic presidential candidates to cool their push to decriminalize illegal border crossings, saying such a move would be tantamount to “open borders” policy and lead to hundreds of thousands more people flooding into the U.S. every month.

“That is tantamount to declaring publicly that we have open borders,” Jeh Johnson told The Washington Post.

“That is unworkable, unwise and does not have the support of a majority of American people or the Congress, and if we had such a policy, instead of 100,000 apprehensions a month, it will be multiples of that,” he said.



These fuckers are their own worse enemy...and I'm loving it!!
Who you picking again in 2020 YR...were listening.
P.S. SPEED is this the "move" to the left you seem so pumped up on...DO TELL!!
bb1961 is online now   Quote
Old 07-05-2019, 12:48 PM   #2
rexdutchman
Valued Poster
 
rexdutchman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1, 2013
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 12,555
Encounters: 22
Default

rexdutchman is offline   Quote
Old 07-05-2019, 12:53 PM   #3
Joey_Gleet
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 13, 2013
Location: KCMO
Posts: 1,882
Encounters: 30
Default

How many of them have removed the doors to their own houses and the walls around their property ?
Joey_Gleet is offline   Quote
Old 07-05-2019, 01:08 PM   #4
gnadfly
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 14,460
Default

Not Nancy Pelosi.
gnadfly is offline   Quote
Old 07-05-2019, 01:18 PM   #5
Hotrod511
Valued Poster
 
Hotrod511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 9, 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 2,354
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bb1961 View Post
This is a story out of the WAPO...behind pay wall and I won't pay for bird cage liner.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/immig...=.39493ebbe5d3

YR you and the left should be proud...this is a real winner in 2020!!
YR the "IDEA" you spoke of...BRILLIANT!!
You got the room in your cave YR??
This is an small excerpt from the article on WAPO:

An Obama-era Department of Homeland Security chief is warning Democratic presidential candidates to cool their push to decriminalize illegal border crossings, saying such a move would be tantamount to “open borders” policy and lead to hundreds of thousands more people flooding into the U.S. every month.

“That is tantamount to declaring publicly that we have open borders,” Jeh Johnson told The Washington Post.

“That is unworkable, unwise and does not have the support of a majority of American people or the Congress, and if we had such a policy, instead of 100,000 apprehensions a month, it will be multiples of that,” he said.

and the streets of Austin will soon be full of human feces

These fuckers are their own worse enemy...and I'm loving it!!
Who you picking again in 2020 YR...were listening.
P.S. SPEED is this the "move" to the left you seem so pumped up on...DO TELL!!
Hotrod511 is offline   Quote
Old 07-05-2019, 05:12 PM   #6
Whisky_1
Valued Poster
 
Whisky_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2, 2019
Location: Lake Charles, LA
Posts: 240
Default

WOW! Just simmer down now! You do know that 45 and his department of state and not any Obama Era official is currently responsible and accountable for US foreign policy. Furthermore, the border crossings were in a state of decline until 45 took office. Comprehensive immigration policy and law reform are needed. However, the current "crisis" along the Southern border of the US is a human mishap and the undesirable consequences of 45's compaign promises and immigration policies. Many of 45's proposed immigration initiatives have been deemed unconstitutional by the federal courts. Moreover, installing a white nationalist as the architect of US immigration was not a smart move if 45 and his strategic planners are truly interested in effective immigration reform. A more viable and cost effective approach would be for 45 to just stop tweeting and bring an end to American interference in the internal affairs of other sovereign nations around the globe. Second, "working with" rather than against trading partners to create economic opportunities in regions impacted by proxy wars and social disorganization including the Southern border region of the US. Next, consider that emotionally derived policies and laws are rarely efficient or cost effective and usually produce undesirable outcomes. You know like installing policies that increase apprehensions along the Southern border region without first increasing the supporting infrastructure.
Whisky_1 is offline   Quote
Old 07-05-2019, 05:31 PM   #7
oeb11
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 23,345
Default

You do know that immigration law is the province of Congress - and the house DPST's are flagrantly blocking any constructive legislation addressing the issue - so they can blame trump and benefit in 2020 elections.

Keep on keeping on DPST's and candidates - I love to hear you propose open borders to all comers.

See how that fare2 in Nov 2020




What Authority Does the U.S. Constitution Give the Federal Government Regarding Immigration?

A – The word “immigration” does not appear in the U.S. Constitution or any of its Amendments. Article I, Section 8, Clause 4 does read, “… To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, …”. The 14th Amendment, Section 1 addresses the protection of “All persons born or naturalized in the United States,…” which extended citizenship through the States to the former slaves. The rules of immigration were reserved to the States through the 10th Amendment until the first Federal law was enacted in 1875. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled the following year that immigration regulation was an exclusive Federal responsibility. Congress established the Immigration Service in 1891, which was the first time the Federal government took an active role. Congress enacted additional quota systems after World War I in the years 1921 and 1924. The laws remained largely unchanged until the passage of the “The Immigration and Nationality Act Amendments of 1965.” Changes to admittance were made again in 1976 and 1978. “The Immigration Act of 1990″ added a category of admission based on diversity and increased the worldwide immigration ceiling.
Other changes came through the introduction of new categories of immigration and citizenship with the resettlement of refugees after World War II. “The Refugee Act of 1980” allowed the President the authority to admit refugees on an annual basis, in consultation with Congress in response to United Nations protocols in 1967 and 1969, derived from the 1951 United Nations Refugee Convention. This new legislation was the first time that our country used international standards and definitions for our immigration policies. “The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986” addressed unauthorized immigration creating two amnesty programs “legalizing” about 2.7 million people who illegally entered the country. Because illegal immigration remained a problem, “The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996” was passed to provide greater controls on the borders and reduced benefits. The last change occurred with “The Homeland Security Act of 2002” which now has consolidated authority for border protection, naturalization, customs and immigration.
oeb11 is offline   Quote
Old 07-05-2019, 05:34 PM   #8
oeb11
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 23,345
Default

Bring an end to interference in the internal affairs of other sovereign nations

Agreed

Stop the wasteful foreign aid - billions of dollars down rat-holes like Guatemala and Honduras with nothing to show for it except graft and corruption.

I agree with You W! - one of the smartest things you ever posted.



Problem is the DPST idiots are addicted to giving away billions of dollars in the vague hope that someone out there might someday "Like Me"!!!
oeb11 is offline   Quote
Old 07-05-2019, 05:48 PM   #9
Whisky_1
Valued Poster
 
Whisky_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2, 2019
Location: Lake Charles, LA
Posts: 240
Default

Many strategic leaders in Civil Law countries tend to leverage bribes the same way multinational corperations leverage lobbyists. This trait makes corruption hard to combat.
Whisky_1 is offline   Quote
Old 07-05-2019, 05:56 PM   #10
oeb11
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 23,345
Default

Tacit approval of feeding the corruption from the US government tit- paid for by taxpayers who are disgusted with the waste and corruption.

Thank You W1
oeb11 is offline   Quote
Old 07-06-2019, 10:35 PM   #11
matchingmole
Valued Poster
 
matchingmole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 30, 2009
Location: Only minutes from downtown
Posts: 7,183
Encounters: 30
Default

Open boarders? Like people who stay in motels?
matchingmole is offline   Quote
Old 07-07-2019, 05:24 AM   #12
oeb11
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 23,345
Default

"White nationalist" - DPST speak for KKK style racists - an example of the racism and Plantation politics of the DPST Party
One does not choose the color of one's skin - Conservatives decry racism in all its forms.

Nationalism- as has been written - I support my Nation always, and the Government when it deserves support.



My definition of a White Nationalist" - and i repudiate your attempt to tar every Conservative as a racist with this DPST terminology. It is DPST racism.
oeb11 is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved