trump on offensive? Something like that.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

That's why you hate the links.
I'll continue to post links to the info I use. You continue to flap your gums.
You throw accusations and your verdicts at a multitude of people while ignoring a proven scumbag you idolize. I'm glad I don't have to live in the world you and the base do. The only thing that kept trump from facing his deeds was his own people ignoring him. Because in many instances, he forgot what he told them to do. I can't believe we even have to talk about this....I take that back. You were the guy saying the morons were saying "spying" instead of "surveillance" in that thread about CNN because "spying" was easier to say. You shot your side in the foot....again. You know what I mean.
I can give you a link if you want.
You'll get your chance to vote in 2020. If you aren't in jail.

"Spying" and "surveillance" are synonyms. The hairsplitting argument that "surveillance" isn't in fact "spying" is disingenuous bullshit and the spew of desperate dim-retards grasping at straws to deflect from the reality that fucking Odumbo SPIED on Trump.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

That's why you hate the links.

I don't even "hate" you. I don't "hate" slugs either.

And maggots serve a useful purpose in the life cycle.

What's your "purpose"?

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

"Spying" and "surveillance" are synonyms. The hairsplitting argument that "surveillance" isn't in fact "spying" is disingenuous bullshit and the spew of desperate dim-retards grasping at straws to deflect from the reality that fucking Odumbo SPIED on Trump.

The SocialistLiberalAntiTrumpers are not known for their command of English.

Unfortunately, they're not well versed in Spanish either!

[Munchmasterman]

Both out of context gum flappers in one post.

Synonyms aren't always direct replacements for each other (context determines what is suitable. That must be why you don't know shit about it) and what the fuck does spanish have to do with this?

Originally Posted by LexusLover

The SocialistLiberalAntiTrumpers are not known for their command of English.

Unfortunately, they're not well versed in Spanish either!

[Munchmasterman]

How does an ex-council indictment figure in your logic? He got popped for lying to Mueller, like flynn.
We were talking about FISA or illegal methods of investigation. How can we talk when you can't think? I didn't say there were no indictments to come from the Mueller investigation.

Pull your head out.

Originally Posted by bb1961

No indictments in the Mulehead investigation...THINK AGAIN!!
What were you saying...easy to prove wrong...
Sometime "FACTS" suck for you!!
P.S. I would never put you on ignore...you're to easy to debuke!!
https://www.jurist.org/news/2019/04/...-with-ukraine/

Originally Posted by bb1961

Is this like...
Undocumented migrants...ILLEGAL ALIENS
Reproductive right...ABORTION
Pro choice...PRO ABORTION
Progressive...LIBERALS
Voters right...VOTER FRAUD
Sanctuary cites...ILLEGAL ALIEN SAFE ZONES
Surveillance...SPYING
It's called LIBERAL CODE DECIPHERING!!
Got ya Munchy!!

You're trying so hard.

2 exclamation points too!!

Another example of you thinking opinion is fact.

And in this case, who gives a fuck?

Did you figure this out on the decoder ring that came in your trumpy cereal?

Go back and study for your GED.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Both out of context gum flappers in one post.

Synonyms aren't always direct replacements for each other (context determines what is suitable. That must be why you don't know shit about it) and what the fuck does spanish have to do with this?

Your multiple lies and distortions will never become the truth, no matter how many times you repeat them.

[Munchmasterman]

You're like a kid who doesn't get enough attention.

The post you responded to was a response to a specific post. But you have to jump in with nonsense that has nothing to do with you.

But what the fuck. You want to be the tee ball for batting practice, who am I to stop you?

Originally Posted by bb1961

No indictments in the Mulehead investigation...THINK AGAIN!!
What were you saying...easy to prove wrong...
Sometime "FACTS" suck for you!!
P.S. I would never put you on ignore...you're to easy to debuke!!
https://www.jurist.org/news/2019/04/...-with-ukraine/

[gfejunkie]

Just more whining from the liberal media because they didn't get what they wanted from the Mueller report. We can expect more as President Trump continues to tell the idiot congressional demoncRATS to go pound sand.

[Munchmasterman]

There is the difference between us. I know that. That's why I try not to lie.

You on the the other hand, repeat lies so many times that because you believe them, you think others do too.
When in reality they don't want to get in a prolonged battle with you. You're the king of "I know you are but what am I". If you had balls you would post my lies but you don't have either...my lies or balls.

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Your multiple lies and distortions will never become the truth, no matter how many times you repeat them.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

There is the difference between us. I know that. That's why I try not to lie.

You on the the other hand, repeat lies so many times that because you believe them, you think others do too.
When in reality they don't want to get in a prolonged battle with you. You're the king of "I know you are but what am I". If you had balls you would post my lies but you don't have either...my lies or balls.

It's not at all a lie to point out to you and others that the whole premise of your argument is founded on the belief that blacks and other minorities are not Americans. You've made that a part of your discourse from the very beginning.

[friendly fred]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

How about we start with some proof?

Nothing has been overturned. Nobody has been indicted for any of your "facts".
You making your claims a thousand times doesn't change the fact none of your story has been proven.

Why don't we stick with the facts?

Why would I get mad? You are easy to prove wrong.

The story is still developing - don't rush to judgement!

You are acting mad just like I thought you would. Calm down.

When the basis for the FISA warrants is eventually discredited the rest of the story will unfold. Be patient.

Your lack of education is evident with all of your posts. You think you are clever but you are tragically unaware of your shortcomings. Try to seek first to understand, then to be understood.

[bb1961]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

How does an ex-council indictment figure in your logic? He got popped for lying to Mueller, like flynn.
We were talking about FISA or illegal methods of investigation. How can we talk when you can't think? I didn't say there were no indictments to come from the Mueller investigation.

Pull your head out.



You're trying so hard.

2 exclamation points too!!


Another example of you thinking opinion is fact.

And in this case, who gives a fuck?

Did you figure this out on the decoder ring that came in your trumpy cereal?

Go back and study for your GED.

Show me ONE article where one doesn't replace the other...you fucking can't!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[bb1961]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

How does an ex-council indictment figure in your logic? He got popped for lying to Mueller, like flynn.
We were talking about FISA or illegal methods of investigation. How can we talk when you can't think? I didn't say there were no indictments to come from the Mueller investigation.

This straight out of the article...THAT'S your MAN.
(The allegations against Craig stem from the Robert Mueller investigation.)
There will be a LOT more coming...BRACE YOURSELF.
You only see what you want to see.
What part of that don't you comprehend?MUNCHY