Lisa Page's just released testimony is Very telling..

[bb1961]

Originally Posted by themystic

Reach for it bb.............the olive branch is ripe for the plucking..............you will be washed clean and forgiven all your transgressions. Let go and free yourself bb

Are you posting as SC or TM...doesn't really matter...

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by gnadfly

I don't understand why this isn't the lede of every website and newschannel on the internet.

I also don't understand why Rosenstein is still employed by the DOJ.

he's supposed to be leaving this month.

[themystic]

Originally Posted by bb1961

Are you posting as SC or TM...doesn't really matter...

Take the branch my son..........reach.........its right in front of you bb. oeb11 received the branch and he was washed clean of his transgression. take it bb...............its here...you will be transformed

[oeb11]

The usual Lies from the TM/YR/SC SomeOne.

There was no "Olive Branch" - Only a figurative Lucy holding the football - and All Knew It.

Take Your Fake religiosity and Can it, SomeOne.
Religious hypocrisy - claiming to speak for God - Please go get some serious Help!

SomeOne fits right in with the Moscow Austin Milieu - Remember -
Christian reiligion is anathema to Admission to the Progressive Socialists - the Only Way is to Marry Omar and convert to an acceptable Religion in the eyes of the DPST party.SomeOne can have Four Wives - and Never hobby Again!

[Munchmasterman]

Wrong. She wasn't testifying under oath. (Page 6 of pdf download) If you had read her testimony (don't feel bad, redstate did not feel the need to include parts of her testimony that shot holes in their story).
And if you attempt to quote some one,
It's best to actually quote them. The text "there's no big there there" is well explained starting @ page 111 or 112., depending how much context you want. How the fuck would he know there was nothing there the first day on what has become almost a 2 year investigation? One that has produced 37 indictments or guilty pleas. No collusion you say? That charge isn't even on Mueller's letter of authority. It's pretty clear her explanation of your misquoted text is correct.
Very ironic that ratcliffe's charge of aving prejudged trump applies to himself referring to Page. He ignores all context except that which supports his theory.
Somehow I have a feeling this person who according to you is under oath, (again,
she's not) is about to be dumped on your liars pile (no, not the liars pile with trump on it).

You are right....about one thing.
The truth does hurt, doesn't it?

Originally Posted by lustylad

Because it came straight from the horse's mouth, Jussie. FBI agent Lisa Page was testifying under oath. Good thing you don't have to testify under oath.

And don't forget how Lisa's fellow FBI agent/lover Peter Stzrok texted her saying he didn't want to drop the hildebeast email probe and switch to the Russia investigation because he knew "there is no there there".

The truth (not the trash) hurts, doesn't it troll boy?

[Munchmasterman]

]I was hoping you would correct your bullshit.
I remember all the times you said you admit it when you're wrong. I remember calling it a lie then, just like it is now. Like I said. Nothing has changed about you.

Wrong. She wasn't testifying under oath. (Page 6 of pdf download) If you had read her testimony (don't feel bad, redstate did not feel the need to include parts of her testimony that shot holes in their story).
And if you attempt to quote some one,
It's best to actually quote them. The text "there's no big there there" is well explained starting @ page 111 or 112., depending how much context you want. How the fuck would he know there was nothing there the first day on what has become almost a 2 year investigation? One that has produced 37 indictments or guilty pleas. No collusion you say? That charge isn't even on Mueller's letter of authority. It's pretty clear her explanation of your misquoted text is correct.
Very ironic that ratcliffe's charge of having prejudged trump applies to himself referring to Page. He ignores all context except that which supports his theory.
Somehow I have a feeling this person who according to you is under oath, (again,
she's not) is about to be dumped on your liars pile (no, not the liars pile with trump on it).

You are right....about one thing.
The truth does hurt, doesn't it?

Originally Posted by lustylad

Because it came straight from the horse's mouth, Jussie. FBI agent Lisa Page was testifying under oath. Good thing you don't have to testify under oath.

And don't forget how Lisa's fellow FBI agent/lover Peter Stzrok texted her saying he didn't want to drop the hildebeast email probe and switch to the Russia investigation because he knew "there is no there there".

The truth (not the trash) hurts, doesn't it troll boy?

[FrankZappa]

That is the problem with these guys ,they get the news from Breitbart, RedState, Alex Jones, Fox and a lot of other fake news sources. It is real simple, you just use that google button on your computer and if your IQ is above 100 you can tell what bullshit is.

Trump has lied over 9,000 times since being in office and many of you believe him. You are following a snake oil salesman that committed treasonous acts.

https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/20...clinton/223139

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by FrankZappa

That is the problem with these guys ,they get the news from Breitbart, RedState, Alex Jones, Fox and a lot of other fake news sources. It is real simple, you just use that google button on your computer and if your IQ is above 100 you can tell what bullshit is.

Trump has lied over 9,000 times since being in office and many of you believe him. You are following a snake oil salesman that committed treasonous acts.

https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/20...clinton/223139

You're citing that cock-sucker David Brock's Media Matters co-founded by hildebeest and funded by Soros as though that shit isn't biased? You're either a blatant, congenital liar or one of the most ignorant lib-retards that ever existed.

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

]I was hoping you would correct your bullshit.
I remember all the times you said you admit it when you're wrong. I remember calling it a lie then, just like it is now. Like I said. Nothing has changed about you.

Wrong. She wasn't testifying under oath. (Page 6 of pdf download) If you had read her testimony (don't feel bad, redstate did not feel the need to include parts of her testimony that shot holes in their story).
And if you attempt to quote some one,
It's best to actually quote them. The text "there's no big there there" is well explained starting @ page 111 or 112., depending how much context you want. How the fuck would he know there was nothing there the first day on what has become almost a 2 year investigation? One that has produced 37 indictments or guilty pleas. No collusion you say? That charge isn't even on Mueller's letter of authority. It's pretty clear her explanation of your misquoted text is correct.
Very ironic that ratcliffe's charge of having prejudged trump applies to himself referring to Page. He ignores all context except that which supports his theory.
Somehow I have a feeling this person who according to you is under oath, (again,
she's not) is about to be dumped on your liars pile (no, not the liars pile with trump on it).

You are right....about one thing.
The truth does hurt, doesn't it?

Your dissembling is irrelevant. Lisa Page's testimony required -- as stipulated by Federal law -- that she testify as forthright and honest as if she had been under oath.

[bb1961]

This coming from the discredited munch...says he is going to come back with links to disprove and...NADA!!
The guy is FULL of nothing...just like the rest on the left...empty suits!!
Still waiting for those links munch...put up or shut up!!