Poll

[francoj]

Just curious.
With Snatch shut down who misses it and who doesnt? Some cities have it like Austin and San Antonio, others like Houston and Dallas don't. There are enough people on both sides of a transaction in these different cities to have perspective.

[Whispers]

SNATCH threads are allowed to exist although they circumvent the limitations the site places on the whores.

It takes too much effort to enforce the rules put in place for a MOD and often becomes a prime example of double standards in regards to enforcement.

The site does well enough in major markets without them.

[JohnnyYanks]

In San Antonio Mokoa and Old T seem to manage it well enough.

It is a convenient snapshot of who might be readily available, although there does tend to be a lot of repeat (almost daily) posters.

[phaedrus]

I find daily posting to snatch to be another kind of information... and it's probably not what the posters intended

[JohnnyYanks]

Sure. But many mongers don't mind.

[Lena Duvall]

Or it may be exactly what a companion intends: to let it be known that she has availability that day. There are some who are fixated on speculating on whether one escort or another is desperate based on SNATCH posts, or god forbid threADs (which are totally allowed despite being frowned upon by some) and it's not that deep.

Another fun fact that some super poster hobbyists fail to understand is that it's not always about them. There are so many sweet as pie gents who are introverted/low-key and like to read the coed posts made by different providers to get a feel for their personalities and interests before booking even if they choose to abstain for posting.

...and it's probably not what the posters intended

[Treetop78759]

Your email looks like RW info. Be careful with that.