So who is SassySue?

[chicagoboy]

Originally Posted by lustylad

So is the new ban for trying to circumvent the old ban with multiple handles?

That would be a bad precedent for WTF.

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Do you get the impression that the providers (females) want Hillary because they believe she will be "friendly" to their professional status?

Whores for Hillary!

It has a 'ring' to it.

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Do you get the impression that the providers (females) want Hillary because they believe she will be "friendly" to their professional status?

I don't think so. I think she is being "Politically Correct" to be on the good side of Hilliary. she is after all a woman, in that vein, sisters got to stick together.

[Tiny]

Originally Posted by chicagoboy

So, it would appear, is SassySue.

Any idea why he was banned? I looked a few weeks ago and couldn't find a single post of his that wasn't in the Political forum. Given that he appeared to spend every waking hour posting here I figured there was an outside chance he was being paid to post. Or more likely a volunteer, a retired guy or someone on social security disability who thought he was doing his party and comrades a favor by changing minds on eccie.net. That is, he was deluded.

[Tiny]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Sue is a gorgeous lady with an inquisitive mind. I don't agree with her much, but she does a good job of defending her ideas.

Why don't you fuck him and post a review.

[DSK]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

The law is anti provider.

Funny. We can discuss whookerism here, infidelity, fetish, even glory holes. And now we can debate the traitorous behavior of a presidential candidate and his knowing, willing invitation to a foreign power to invade our security. But we can't discuss legalizing (forbidden topic).

I wonder why that's not allowed in the more than half the country where it is legalism one form or another. Even in Texas.

Are you referring to Hillary selling uranium to Russia?