Quote:
Originally Posted by Lubeman
What's the difference between not giving a client bbbj and then letting him do daty? Just curious.
|
There are not a lot of serious STI's that can live in the front of mouth and on the tongue. Only one I can think of is herpes simplex type I, which is the normal cause of cold sores (fever blisters.). Herpes type I is occasionally known to infect genital areas as well.
And a few of us have herpes simplex type II (the usual genital kind) on our lips. So it could be theoretically passed on to genital region through DATY.
But generally, giving an STI from oral to oral or oral to genital contact is quite rare. Think it -- if kissing could spread these diseases, we'd have a even more of them around. I consider DATY and kissing about equal in risk.
Thus, the ladies are actually behaving logically when the want to perform covered BJ, but allow DATY.
Gonorrhea in particular seems to live in the throat (though usually in immunocompromised hosts) and thus providers are at risk when giving BBBJ. But its a pretty small risk, compared to all the others. Especially since most of the time we are asked or frankly prefer not to cum in her mouth.
Oral to genital or genital to oral, or oral to oral HIV infection is rare as hell, but not impossible. Usually occurs in the setting of additional infections or wounds that compromise the integrity of the skin or mucosa, thus allowing transmission.
HIV from a man to a woman is much more of a possible event for the woman since bare intercourse often results in micotears in the vaginal mucosa, and semen is FULL of HIV. DATY is less traumatic and there is less HIV in saliva. HIV from a woman to a man when having bare vaginal intercourse is also much less common, but still possible enough that it should not be risked.
Finally, anal is the most risk. Being on the receiving end is the most dangerous. But the penetrating penis also can get exposed as it turns out that rectal mucosa likes to bleed when fucked, at least a little.....