Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
646 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Jon Bon |
389 |
Harley Diablo |
375 |
honest_abe |
362 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
You&Me |
281 |
Starscream66 |
273 |
George Spelvin |
262 |
sharkman29 |
255 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 70696 | biomed1 | 62434 | Yssup Rider | 60274 | gman44 | 53222 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 48406 | WTF | 48267 | pyramider | 46370 | bambino | 41328 | CryptKicker | 37179 | Mokoa | 36491 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | The_Waco_Kid | 35745 | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
03-03-2016, 09:23 AM
|
#1
|
Simply Extraordinary
User ID: 315773
Join Date: Sep 18, 2015
Location: Downtown Houston / Baytown
Posts: 603
My ECCIE Reviews
|
International SexWorker Rights Day - March 3
I just want to bring sex worker rights to the attention of everyone and the need for decriminalization of sex work. You can find out more on swopusa.com and in this article http://www.nswp.org/sites/nswp.org/f...20150410_0.pdf
|
|
Quote
| 3 users liked this post
|
03-03-2016, 12:41 PM
|
#2
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Nov 18, 2013
Location: Northeast Indiana
Posts: 748
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by River Song
|
^^^^^ +1000. At least.
How anyone can accord any credence to what our lawfakers have to say about right and wrong, when they, taken as a class, are the most notorious liars, cheaters, thieves, and murderers to be found anywhere, is beyond understanding. And these clowns can -- and do, regularly -- put decent people in cages, at gunpoint. Today in particular, we should think particularly of a certain subset of those decent people: our sisters who are doing sex work.
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
03-03-2016, 06:19 PM
|
#3
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Nov 3, 2015
Location: Cabot, Arkansas.
Posts: 804
|
I'm a hobby virgin and looking forward to my first date. It seems that screening would simplify and improve the screening process. Fear of undercover clients would no longer be an issue. STDs could be tracked and controlled more efficiently and effectively. Client provider social events would be possible.
So, lets have a Happy Hooker Day.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
03-04-2016, 10:20 AM
|
#4
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Nov 18, 2013
Location: Northeast Indiana
Posts: 748
|
[QUOTE=PsychedelicDog;105787689 2 ... It seems that screening would simplify and improve the screening process. ... [/QUOTE]
?????
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
03-04-2016, 11:21 AM
|
#5
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Feb 21, 2013
Location: US
Posts: 1,071
|
in parts of Nevada its already legal yet guys and gals still break the law anyway because its cheaper and more anonymous that way. right?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
03-04-2016, 12:05 PM
|
#6
|
Pending Age Verification
User ID: 125175
Join Date: Mar 8, 2012
Location: Indianapolis.Indiana
Posts: 2,111
|
No free lunch in the adult business
Quote:
Originally Posted by joesmo888
in parts of Nevada its already legal yet guys and gals still break the law anyway because its cheaper and more anonymous that way. right?
|
Rest of states need to be Nevada brothels.No screening in legal business....Illegal everyone's at risks.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
03-04-2016, 12:53 PM
|
#7
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Feb 21, 2013
Location: US
Posts: 1,071
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fancylady
Rest of states need to be Nevada brothels.No screening in legal business....Illegal everyone's at risks.
|
would it matter? you would still have streetwalkers, bp providers, etc. wouldn't change a thing. a lot of guys would rather spend $80 on a bp chick then visit a brothel. or go on here and pay $$ for an hour. and they would still be breaking the law. a brothel is too business like and something that is over priced in the internet age where you can go online and hook up with someone within minutes
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
03-04-2016, 12:57 PM
|
#8
|
Pending Age Verification
User ID: 125175
Join Date: Mar 8, 2012
Location: Indianapolis.Indiana
Posts: 2,111
|
No free lunch in the adult business
Quote:
Originally Posted by joesmo888
would it matter? you would still have streetwalkers, bp providers, etc. wouldn't change a thing. a lot of guys would rather spend $80 on a bp chick then visit a brothel. or go on here and pay $$ for an hour. and they would still be breaking the law. a brothel is too business like and something that is over priced in the internet age where you can go online and hook up with someone within minutes
|
All levels sex workers for paid time.Sex workers discriminate on each others. I wish all states make business legal.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
03-04-2016, 01:23 PM
|
#9
|
Simply Extraordinary
User ID: 315773
Join Date: Sep 18, 2015
Location: Downtown Houston / Baytown
Posts: 603
My ECCIE Reviews
|
We do not want "legalization" - we want "decriminalization". The govt doesn't need to be in the sheets with us.
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
03-04-2016, 01:30 PM
|
#10
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Feb 21, 2013
Location: US
Posts: 1,071
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by River Song
We do not want "legalization" - we want "decriminalization". The govt doesn't need to be in the sheets with us.
|
boom. this is exactly right
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
03-04-2016, 02:34 PM
|
#11
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Nov 3, 2015
Location: Cabot, Arkansas.
Posts: 804
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PsychedelicDog
I'm a hobby virgin and looking forward to my first date. It seems that screening would simplify and improve the screening process. Fear of undercover clients would no longer be an issue. STDs could be tracked and controlled more efficiently and effectively. Client provider social events would be possible.
So, lets have a Happy Hooker Day.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by James1588
?????
|
As I said, LE wouldn't be an issue. Hobbyists might be less concerned about providing screening information. Statements like in my signature wouldn't be necessary. I'll admit those statements may be folly anyway, but they make me feel like I have some level of defense.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
03-04-2016, 06:23 PM
|
#12
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Nov 18, 2013
Location: Northeast Indiana
Posts: 748
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PsychedelicDog
As I said, LE wouldn't be an issue. Hobbyists might be less concerned about providing screening information. Statements like in my signature wouldn't be necessary. I'll admit those statements may be folly anyway, but they make me feel like I have some level of defense.
|
I guess what I was having trouble understanding was the sentence (in the post I responded to), "It seems that screening would simplify and improve the screening process." Don't really see how screening simplifies the screening process. I'm guessing you might have intended to say that decriminalization would simplify screening ... if so, I'd agree.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
03-04-2016, 08:55 PM
|
#13
|
Pending Age Verification
User ID: 255765
Join Date: Aug 14, 2014
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 482
My ECCIE Reviews
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by River Song
We do not want "legalization" - we want "decriminalization". The govt doesn't need to be in the sheets with us.
|
+2...
As for Nevada laws, brothels are legal in any county that has a population of under 100,000. Prostitution outside of the supervision of a brothel is not. That leaves Clark County (Las Vegas) out by a long shot and its a huge county geographically... So in part, its a convenience thing. But also, speaking for myself at least, I don't want someone else telling me what Im worth, what to do, with whom and then taking a cut out of any $$ I was paid to do it. I already pay taxes on everything I make, thats enough... I value my independence and sexuality too damn much to hand over the reigns to anyone else... And that includes the government.
|
|
Quote
| 3 users liked this post
|
03-05-2016, 07:45 AM
|
#14
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Nov 3, 2015
Location: Cabot, Arkansas.
Posts: 804
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by James1588
I guess what I was having trouble understanding was the sentence (in the post I responded to), "It seems that screening would simplify and improve the screening process." Don't really see how screening simplifies the screening process. I'm guessing you might have intended to say that decriminalization would simplify screening ... if so, I'd agree.
|
You are correct. I apologize for the confusion. My mind must have been scrambled, again.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
03-05-2016, 10:44 AM
|
#15
|
Provider
User ID: 18458
Join Date: Mar 14, 2010
Location: Houston, TX based & Touring
Posts: 370
My ECCIE Reviews
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by River Song
We do not want "legalization" - we want "decriminalization". The govt doesn't need to be in the sheets with us.
|
+ 1 Agreed!!!
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|