Why are some GOP candidates and Fox News downplaying the actions of Dylann Roof???

[Old-T]

Originally Posted by lustylad

There is no "fox hypocrisy" on this act of terror. FOX called it terrorism from the get-go. Go back and watch the O'Reilly clip again (#22). What's wrong with you? It's bad enough to make things up in the first place as the OP did. But how can you keep spewing the same falsehoods after I just posted a video proving them to be false? Are you deaf, blind, dumb - or all 3?

Un-fucking-believable.

So many of the videos posted on here are nothing but annoying belching that the few that are real substance get tossed/ignored in a guilt by association situation.

Thank your pal IIFFy.

Additionally if you learned how to write without so many insults then readers might start taking you seriously.

If Fox did call this terrorism, then good on them--there is some hope after all.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

It's hard for racist trolls to call something what it is. They rather call it anything other than what it actually is. They've called it terrorism. They've said it was an assault on religion, etc. You'll never hear the truth from them. They are a bunch of privileged shitstains who probably have black 'friends' and so they couldn't possibly be racist.

You're even stupider than Old-T. At least he went back and watched the O'Reilly vid and stopped falsely railing against FOX. You need to do the same. Then come back and explain what it "actually is" - i.e. what you claim FOX didn't call it.

Fucking sewer rat.

[gnadfly]

Originally Posted by Old-T

I think the terrorist comment was not so much intended to say this shooting was a terrorist attack as it was to point out the fox hypocrisy when compaired to other killings that the RW did want to lable "terrorist".

You assert the above.

Originally Posted by gnadfly

What shootings does Fox want to label as "terrorist" that haven't been labeled as "terrorist?" A list please or STFU.

I ask for evidence.

Originally Posted by Old-T

Clearly a rhetorical question that is too dumb to be worth an answer.

You run and refuse to provide evidence to support your assertion. Why? Because there is none.

Originally Posted by Old-T

So many of the videos posted on here are nothing but annoying belching that the few that are real substance get tossed/ignored in a guilt by association situation.

Thank your pal IIFFy.

Additionally if you learned how to write without so many insults then readers might start taking you seriously.

If Fox did call this terrorism, then good on them--there is some hope after all.

What a cop out. Blaming so many vids. This thread and the other one has many posts from various posters saying Fox called it "terrorism" .

And you started a thread where your OP starts out by insulting another poster.

Originally Posted by lustylad

You're even stupider than Old-T. At least he went back and watched the O'Reilly vid and stopped falsely railing against FOX. You need to do the same. Then come back and explain what it "actually is" - i.e. what you claim FOX didn't call it.

Fucking sewer rat.

That's what trolls do. If Old-T went back and watched the O'Reilly vid I don't see where he owned up to it.

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by lustylad

You're even stupider than Old-T. At least he went back and watched the O'Reilly vid and stopped falsely railing against FOX. You need to do the same. Then come back and explain what it "actually is" - i.e. what you claim FOX didn't call it.

Fucking sewer rat.

Fox first said it was religion and that we needed to arm preachers. Then once it's undeniably a racist attack, suddenly the part about arming people falls silent. They don't want to arm black preachers, just the white ones. And as far as O'Reilly goes, he's a hyperbolic piece of shit and I don't give two fucks what he thinks or says. You and he are alike in that respect. If you think Fox is anything but in the tank for conservatives, you're fucking stupid. You are their target audience though. Old white men between the ages of 62 and death, who are afraid of brown people.

Oh no, Lusty Ladyboy thinks I'm a sewer rat. My day is ruined. BooHoo.

[Yssup Rider]

Who gives a frog's fat ass WHAT people call it?

Are you searching for vindication? Authentication? Absolution?

A bunch of people went to church and didn't come home.

[TheDaliLama]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Who gives a frog's fat ass WHAT people call it?

Are you searching for vindication? Authentication? Absolution?

A bunch of people went to church and didn't come home.

That's right Assup. And that is the most horrible thing about all of this.

And there is no law restricting guns that could have prevented that. That's just dumb.

And changing flags will not prevent it from happening again. It just depends the divide.

It's not about guns Mr Obama and Mrs Clinton. It's about decency..

It's not about Flags Governor. It's about respect for others.

It's not about Fox.
It's not about the GOP.
It's not about meds.
It's not about the Civil War.


Only one person did this.

The only thing that might work ...as Judge Roy Bean would say.. "A fair trial and hanging". In this case I wouldn't object to a public execution.

But do it quick, I wouldn't want my tax dollars being used so that this animal stays alive and writes a book.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

In this case I wouldn't object to a public execution.

But do it quick, I wouldn't want my tax dollars being used so that this animal stays alive and writes a book.

IMO It should as unceremoniously as turning on the disposal in the kitchen, after due process is administered. More notoriety will simply seal a book deal.

He'll want it quick, also, if they release him into the general population...so a death row cell would probably be a "safe" place for him to count the hours.....

... no frozen meat delivered to the cell, of course.

[TheDaliLama]

"In this case I wouldn't object to a public execution"

That would probably be more effective that anything I've heard so far.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

And changing flags will not prevent it from happening again. It just depends the divide.

It's not about guns Mr Obama and Mrs Clinton. It's about decency..

It's not about Flags Governor. It's about respect for others.

.

The state has no good reason to endorse that flag unless that is the state flag. It is not and should be taken down. That should really have nothing to do with this shooting and everything to do with common sense.