Quote:
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
Then someone comes along and adds some stupid shit to cover up the original post. So we start again with a new thread because the topic is important and we will not give up to turd blossoms.
|
If someone responds with what you believe to be "stupid shit," then why don't you refute it with a reasoned argument, or simply call it out for what you believe it to be, and then make your next point? That's what most people do.
But instead, you have a habit of getting frustrated when the discussion isn't going well for you (which it usually doesn't), punting, and starting a new thread on the
same topic within 24 hours.
And I believe that most participants in this forum have noticed that you seem to have a rather difficult time discerning what is "stupid shit," and what isn't.
There's no need to get frustrated and start a new thread if you can counter your critics in a reasonably cogent, articulate fashion, is there?